Relationship of invasive groundcover plant presence to evidence of disturbance in the forests of the upper midwest of the United States

Invasive Plants and Forest Ecosystems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 29-58

  Moser, W Keith ^a   Hansen, Mark H ^a   Nelson, Mark D ^a   McWilliams, William H ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955007913     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Akaike, H., A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 19, 6, 716, 1974.
2. Amrine, J.W., Multiflora rose, in Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States, Van Driesche, R., Blossey, B., Hoddle, M., Lyon, S., and Reardon, R., Eds., USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, Washington, DC, 265, 2002.
3. Booth, B.D., Murphy, S.D., and Swanton, C.J., Weed Ecology in Natural and Agricultural Systems, CABI, Wallingford, 2003.
4. Crawley, M.J., Brown, S.L., Heard, M.S., and Edwards, G.G., Invasion-resistance in experimental grassland communities: Species richness or species identity? Ecol. Lett., 2, 140, 1999.
5. Daehler, C.C., Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis revisited, Am. Nat., 158, 324, 2001.
6. Daehler, C.C., Performance’s comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 34, 183, 2003.
7. Della Sala, D.A., Stans, N.L., Stritthott, J.R., Hackman, A., and Lacobelli, A. An updated protected areas database for the United States and Canada, Nat. Areas J., 21, 124, 2001.
8. Drake, J.A., Mooney, H.A., Di Castri, F., Groves, R.H., Kruger, F.J., Rejmánek, M., and Williamson, M., Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, Wiley, Chichester, UK (published on behalf of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) of the International Council of Scientific Unions, Series SCOPE report, no. 37), 1989.
9. Ellstrand, N.C. and Schierenbeck, K.A., Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 7043, 2000.
10. Elton, C.S., The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1958.
11. ESRI Data & Maps, 2002. CD-Rom, Environment Systems Research Institute, Inc. 2002.
12. Evans, J.E., A literature review of management practices for multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Nat. Areas J., 3, 1, 6, 1983.
13. Fagan, M.E. and Peart, D.R., Impact of the invasive shrub glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L.) on juvenile recruitment by canopy trees, For. Ecol. Manage., 194, 1-2, 95, 2004.
14. Forman, R.T.T. and Alexander, L.E., Roads and their major ecological effects, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 207, 1998.
15. Gelbard, J.L. and Belnap, J., Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape, Conserv. Biol., 17, 2, 420, 2003.
16. Harrington, R.A., Brown, B.J., Reich, P.B., and Fownes, J.H., Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in Southern Wisconsin. II. Annual growth and carbon gain, Oecologia, 80, 368, 1989.
17. Heilman, G.E., Slosser, N.C., and Strittholt, J.R., Forest intactness of the coterminous United States (CD-ROM database prepared for the World Wildlife Fund and the World Resources Institute’s Global Forest Watch), Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, OR, 2001.
18. Hodkinson, D.J. and Thompson, K., Plant dispersal: The role of man, J. Appl. Ecol., 34, 1484, 1997.
19. Hood, W.G. and Naiman, R.J., Vulnerability of riparian zones to invasion by exotic plants, Plant Ecol., 148, 105, 2000.
20. Hulme, P.E., Biological invasions: Winning the science battles but losing the conservation war? Oryx, 37, 178, 2003.
21. Huston, M.A. and DeAngelis, D.L., Competition and coexistence-The effects of resource transport and supply rates, Am. Nat., 144, 954, 1994.
22. Johnson, P.S., Shifley, S.R., and Rogers, R., The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks, CABI Publishing, New York, 501, 2002.
23. Kowarik, I., Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species, in Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems, Pyšek, P., Prach, K., Rejmanek, M., and Wade, M., Eds., SPB Academic, Amsterdam, 15, 1995.
24. Leatherman, A.D., Ecological life-history of Lonicera japonica Thunb., University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 97, 1955 (unpublished dissertation).
25. Levine, J.M. and D’Antonio, C.M., Elton revisited: A review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility, Oikos, 87, 1, 15, 1999.
26. Lonsdale, W.M., Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility, Ecology, 80, 1522, 1999.
27. Luken, J.O., Population structure and biomass allocation of the naturalized shrub Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim. in forest and open habitats, Am. Midl. Nat., 119, 2, 258, 1988.
28. Luken, J.O. and Goessling, N., Seedling distribution and potential persistence of the exotic shrub Lonicera maackii in fragmented forests, Am. Midl. Nat., 133, 1, 124, 1995.
29. Magurran, A.E., Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 192, 35, 1988.
30. McCarthy, B., Response of a forest understory community to experimental removal of an invasive nonindigenous plant (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae), in Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions, Luken, J.O. and Thieret, J.W., Eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 117, 1997.
31. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, USDA, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. 351, Portland, OR, 122, 1995.
32. McRoberts, R.E., Joint annual forest inventory and monitoring symposium: The North Central perspective, J. For., 97, 12, 27, 1999.
33. Meekins, J.F. and McCarthy, B.C., Competitive ability of Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard, Brassicacaeae), an invasive, nonindigenous forest herb, Int. J. Plant Sci., 160, 4, 743, 1999.
34. Missouri Department of Conservation, Missouri vegetation management manual, Jefferson City, MO, 161, 1997.
35. Mitich, L.W., Intriguing world of weeds: Kudzu (Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi), Weed Technol., 14, 231, 2000.
36. Moser, W.K., Hansen, M.H., McWilliams, W., and Sheffield, R., Oak composition and structure in the Eastern United States, in Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers (Proceedings of a conference, November 15-17, 2005, Columbus, OH), Dickinson, M.B., Ed., Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-1, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 49, 2006.
37. Munger, G.T., Rosa multiflora, in Fire effects information system [Online], U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer), Missoula, MT, 2002. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/, accessed November 15, 2007.
38. North Central Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis (NCRS-FIA), Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide, Volume 1: Field Data Collection Procedures for Phase 2 Plots, Ver. 2.0., USDA, Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, 290, 2005.
39. Nuzzo, V.A., Distribution and spread of the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata [(Bieb.) Cavara & Grande] in North America, in Biological Pollution: Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic Species, McKnight, B.L., Ed., Indiana Academy of Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, 115, 1993.
40. Nuzzo, V.A., Invasion pattern of the herb garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in high quality forests, Biol. Invasions, 1, 1, 169, 1999.
41. Olson, C.L. and Cholewa, A.F., Nonnative invasive plant species of the North Central region. A guide for FIA field crews, USDA, Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, 120, 2005 (unpublished field guide).
42. Plant Conservation Alliance, Various species’ websites, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plant Working group, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact.htm, accessed September 24, 2007, 2006.
43. Pyšek, P., Past and future of predictions in plant invasions: A field test by time, Divers. Distrib., 7, 145, 2001.
44. Pyšek, P. and Hulme, P.E., Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: Linking pattern to process, Ecoscience, 12, 345, 2005.
45. Reineke, L.H., Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged stands, J. Agric. Res., 46, 627, 1933.
46. Rejmánek, M., Invasibility of plant communities, in Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, Drake, J.A., Mooney, H.A., di Castri, F., Groves, R.H., Kruger, F.J., Rejmanek, M., and Williamson, M., Eds., Wiley, Chichester, UK, 369, 1989.
47. Rhoads, A.F. and Block, T.H., The Plants of Pennsylvania, An Illustrated Manual, Morris Arboretum of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1060, 2000.
48. Richardson, D.M. and Bond, W.J., Determinants of plant-distribution-Evidence from pine invasions, Am. Nat., 137, 639, 1991.
49. Richardson, D.M. and Pyšek, P., Plant invasions: Merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 30, 3, 409, 2006.
50. Rudis, V.A., Gray, A., McWilliams, W., O’Brien, R., Olson, C., Oswalt, S., and Schulz, B., Regional monitoring of nonnative plant invasions with the Forest Inventory and Analysis program, in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual FIA Symposium (September 21-24, 2004, Denver, CO), McRoberts, R.E., Reams, G.A., Van Deusen, P.C., and McWilliams, W.H., Eds., Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-70, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 49, 2006.
51. Sax, D.F., Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: Implications for biogeography, J. Biogeogr., 28, 139, 2001.
52. Shannon, C.E., A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Tech. J., 27, 379, 1948.
53. U.S. Department of Agriculture, The PLANTS database, Natural Resource Conservation Service, National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 2007. Available at http:// plants.usda.gov, accessed September 24, 2007.
54. Watkins, R.Z., Chen, J., Pickens, J., and Brosofske, K.D., Effects of roads on understory plants in a managed hardwood landscape, Conserv. Biol., 17, 2, 411, 2003.
55. Webster, C.R., Jenkins, M.A., and Jose, S., Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States, J. For., 104, 7, 366, 2006.
56. Woodall, C.W. and Miles, P.D., New method for determining the relative stand density of forest inventory plots, in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium (September 21-24, 2004, Denver, CO), McRoberts, R.E., Reams, G.A., Van Deusen, P.C., and McWilliams, W.H., Eds., Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-70, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC, 105, 2006.