Casewise visual evaluation for high-performance collaborative visioning of PGDP nuclear enrichment plant end state

World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change - Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 391-400

  Bailey, Keiron ^a   Grossardt, Ted ^b   Ripy, John ^b   Blandford, Ben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community development; Nuclear power; Power plants; Public participation

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT; COMMUNITY VALUES; DYNAMIC VISUALIZATION; FOCUS GROUPS; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LARGE GROUPS; NEURAL NETWORK MODELING; NUCLEAR POWER; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SAMPLING PROTOCOL; STATE MANAGEMENT; VISUAL EVALUATION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; FUZZY LOGIC; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; POWER PLANTS; VISUALIZATION;

WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 77954980495     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/41114(371)45     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Anyaegabanum, C., Hoover, A. and Schwartz, M. 2010. Use of community-based participatory communication to identify community values at a Superfund site. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010. American Society of Civil Engineers.
2. Bailey, K. and Grossardt, T. 2010. Towards Structured Public Involvement: Justice, Geography and Collaborative Decision Support Systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100(1): 57-76.
3. Blandford, B., Bailey, K., Grossardt T. and Ripy, J. 2008. Integrated Transportation and Land Use Scenario Modeling by Visual Evaluation of Examples: Case Study of Jeffersonville, Indiana. Transportation Research Record 2076:192-208.
4. Bailey, K., Grossardt, T., Williams, J., Toole, L. and Bryant, B. 2007. Context-sensitive large bridge design using Casewise Visual Evaluation: Case Study Section 2 Ohio River Bridges Project. Transportation Research Record 2028:85-92.
5. Bailey, K., Grossardt, T. and Pride-Wells, M. 2007. Community Design of a Light Rail Transit- Oriented Development using Casewise Visual Evaluation (CAVE). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 41(3): 235-254. (Pubitemid 46796809)
6. Bailey, K., J. Brumm, and T. Grossardt. 2001. Towards structured public involvement in highway design: A comparative study of visualization methods and preference modeling using CAVE (casewise visual evaluation). Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 5 (1): 1-15.
7. Bailey, K., Grossardt, T., Ripy, J., Toole, L., Williams, J. and Dietrick, J. 2007. Structured public involvement in context-sensitive large bridge design using casewise visual evaluation: Case study of section 2 of Ohio River bridges project. Transportation Research Record 2028:19-27.
8. Chandramouli, V., Ormsbee, L, and Kopp, J. 2007. Land Acquisition Study at Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Site Using MODFLOWT Modeling. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007: Restoring our Natural Habitat. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007. American Society of Civil Engineers.
9. Department of Energy. 2008. Site Management Plan. Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, Kentucky. Annual Revision, FY 2008. DOE/LX/07-0105&D2.
10. Freeman, J. and Godsil, R. 1994. The question of risk: Incorporating community perceptions into environmental risk assessments. Fordham Urban Law Journal 21(3): 547-604.
11. Grossardt, T., Ripy, J. and Bailey, K. 2010. Use Of Structured Public Involvement For Identifying Community Preferences For A Superfund Site End State Vision. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010. American Society of Civil Engineers.
12. Jewell, W., Gill, R., Bailey, K. and Grossardt, T. 2009. A New Method for Public Involvement in Electric Transmission Line Routing. Transactions of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
13. Nelessen, A. 1994. Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities. Chicago and Washington D.C.: American Planning Association Press.
14. Ormsbee, L. and Hoover, A. 2010. End State Vision Process for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010. American Society of Civil Engineers.
15. Ridgley, M. and Ruitenbeek, R. 1999. Optimization of Economic Policies and Investment Projects Using a Fuzzy-Logic Based Cost-Effectiveness Model of Coral Reef Quality: Empirical Results for Montego Bay, Jamaica. Coral Reefs 18(4): 381-392.
16. Steinitz, C. 1990. Toward a Sustainable Landscape with High Visual Preference and High Ecological Integrity. Landscape and Urban Planning 19:213-150.
17. Stamps, A. 1999. Physical determinants of preferences for residential facades. Environment and Behavior 31(6):723-751.
18. Thomas, C. 1998. Maintaining and Restoring Public Trust in Government Agencies and their Employees. Administration and Society 30(2): 166-193. (Pubitemid 128127503)
19. Whitmore, W. Cook, E. and Steiner, F. 1995. Public Involvement in Visual Assessment: Verde River Corridor Study. Landscape Journal 14(1):26-45.
20. Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8(3):338-353.
21. Zube, E., Sell, J. and Taylor, J. 1982. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 9:1-33.