Integrated transportation and land use scenario modeling by visual evaluation of examples: Case study of Jeffersonville, Indiana

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2076, 2008, Pages 192-199

  Blandford, Benjamin ^a   Grossardt, Ted ^a   Ripy, John ^a   Bailey, Keiron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; LAND USE;

CASE-STUDIES; DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS; GENERAL PUBLICS; INDIANA; INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATIONS; LAND USE PLANNING; LAND-USE SCENARIO; PUBLIC IS; SCENARIO MODELS; VISUAL EVALUATION;

MIXTURES;

EID: 61349145589     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2076-21     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Newman, P., and. J. Kenworthy. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. Public Involvement and Planning: Looking Beyond the One to the Many. International Planning Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2000, pp. 321-344.
3. Grossardt, T., and K. Bailey. Justice and the Public's Involvement in Infrastructure Planning. Practicing Planner, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 21-31.
4. Margerum, R. Evaluating Collaborative Planning: Implications from an Analysis of Growth Management. American Planning Association Journal, Vol. 68, No. 2, 2002, pp. 179-193.
5. Campbell-Jackson, M. Public Involvement in Transportation: Collaborating with the Customers. Transportation Research News, No. 220, 2002, p. 3.
6. Khisty, C. J. Education and Training of Transportation Engineers and Planners Vis-à-Vis Public Involvement. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research. Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 171-176.
7. Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. and Parsons Brinckerhoff Quads and Douglas. Public Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision-Making. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 1996. www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/ pittd/cover.htm. Accessed May 15, 2006.
8. Planning Public Involvement and Its Role in Project Development. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2003. www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ pi-p-d.htm. Accessed May 16, 2006.
9. Neighborhood Collaborative Planning. American Planning Association, Washington, D.C., 2006. www.planning.org/casey/bibliography.html, Accessed Aug. 9, 2006.
10. Bailey, K., and T. Grossardt. Addressing the Arnstein Gap: Improving Public Confidence in Transportation Planning and Design through Structured Public Involvement (SPI). In Proc., 11th International GeoMultimedia Symposium (M. Schrenk, ed.), CORP2005, CORP Association, Vienna, Austria, 2006, pp. 337-341.
11. Bailey, K., J. Brumm, and T. Grossardt. Integrating Visualization into Structured Public Involvement: Case Study of Highway Improvement in Central Kentucky. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1817, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 50-57.
12. McCann, E. Where Do You Draw the Line? Landscape, Texts and the Politics of Planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1997, pp. 641-661.
13. Grossardt, T., and K. Bailey. Grounding Justice in Public Meeting Practice. In Proceedings of Real CORP 007 (M. Schrenk, V. Popovich, and J. Benedikt, eds.), CORP Association, Vienna, Austria, 2007, pp. 291-296.
14. An, M., and M. Chen. Estimating Nonmotorized Travel Demand. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2002, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 18-25.
15. Nelessen, A. Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities. American Planning Association Press, Washington, D.C., 1994.
16. Whitmore, W., E. Cook, and F. Steiner. Public Involvement in Visual Assessment: Verde River Corridor Study. Landscape Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1995, pp. 26-45,
17. Bailey, K., J. Brumm, and T. Grossardt. Towards Structured Public Involvement in Highway Design: A Comparative Study of Visualization Methods and Preference Modeling using CAVE (Casewise Visual Evaluation). Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-15.
18. Bailey, K., T. Grossardt, and M. Pride-Wells. Community Design of a Light Rail Transit-Oriented District Using CAVE (Casewise Visual Evaluation). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 235-254.
19. Bailey, K., and T. H. Grossardt. Structured Public Involvement in Context-Sensitive Noise Wall Design Using Casewise Visual Evaluation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1984, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 112-120.
20. Bailey, K., T. H. Grossardt, J. Ripy, L. Toole, J. B. Williams, and J. Dietrick. Structured Public Involvement, in Context-Sensitive Large Bridge Design Using Casewise Visual Evaluation: Case Study of Section 2 of Ohio River Bridges Project. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2028, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 19-27.
21. Stamatiadis, N., K. Bailey, T. H. Grossardt, J. Ripy, and A. Sttombotne. Use of Context-Sensitive Methods to Influence Operating Speeds: Case Study of Rural Highway by Casewise Visual Evaluation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2025, Transportation Research. Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 90-97.
22. Grossardt, T., K. Bailey, and J. Brumm. Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1858, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 95-102.
23. Zadeh, L. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, Vol. 8 No. 3, 1965, pp. 338-353.
24. Lee, D., M. Pietrucha, and S. Sinha. Use of Fuzzy Sets to Evaluate Driver Perception of Vari able Message Signs. In Tiansportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1937, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 96-104.
25. Meegoda, J. Framework for Automatic Condition Assessment of Culverts. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
26. Cheng H., H. Du, L. Hu, and C. Glazier. Vehicle Detection and Classification Using Model-Based and Fuzzy Logic Approaches. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1935, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 154-162.
27. Peeta, S., W. Zhou, and P. Zhang. Modeling and Mitigation of Car-Truck Interactions on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1899, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 117-126.
28. Berry, M., W. Cartwright, and C. Petit. Geographical Visualization: A Participatory Planning Support Tool for Imagining Landscape Futures. Applied GIS, Vol. 2, 2007, pp. 1-17.
29. De Vries, S., R. A. Verheij, P. P. Groenewegen, and P. Spreeuwenberg. Natural Environments-Healthy Environments? An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship Between Greenspace and Health. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1717-1731.
30. McPherson, E. G. Accounting for Benefits and Costs of Urban Green-space, landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1992, pp. 41-51.
31. Kahn, P. H., Jr. The Human Relationship with Nature: Development and Culture. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1999.
32. Jim, C. Y., and W. Y. Chen. Recreation-Amenity Use and Contingent Valuation of Urban Greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 75, Nos. 1-2, 2006, pp. 81-96.
33. City of Jeffersonville, History, www.cityofjeff.net/history/historymain. htm. Accessed July 20, 2007.