Are students of color more likely to graduate from college if they attend more selective institutions? evidence from a cohort of recipients and nonrecipients of the gates millennium scholarship program

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 230-248

  Melguizo, Tatiana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Minority college completion; Noncognitive variables; Selective institutions

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954935621     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: 19351062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0162373710367681     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2. Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the mismatch hypothesis: Differentials in college graduation rates by institutional selectivity. Sociology of Education, 78(4), 294-315.
3. Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2007). Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting of meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 487-511.
4. American Council on Education. (2008). Minorities in higher education twenty-second annual status report. Retrieved fromhttp://store.acenet.edu/showItem.aspx?product=311293&session=87FDFAEF5A3640169EA7A11DF3219B37.
5. Astin, A. (1985). Minorities in American higher education: Recent trends, current prospects, and recommendations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
7. Barron's Educational Series. (1999). Profiles of American colleges (23rd ed.). Woodbury, NY: Author.
8. Becker, G. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytical approach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Bogue, E.G., & Hall, K. (2003). College rankings and ratings: The test of reputation. In E. G. Bogue & K. Hall (Eds.), Quality and accountability in higher education: Improving policy, enhancing performance (pp. 51-75). Westport, CT: Praeger.
10. Bound, J., Jaeger, D., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 443-450.
11. Bowen, W., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M.W., & McPherson, M.S. (2009). Crossing the finish line. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Cabrera, A.F., Burkum, K.R., & La Nasa, S.M. (2004). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of transfer and degree completion. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: A formula for student success (pp. 155-214). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Card, D., & Krueger, A.B. (2004). Would the elimination of affirmative action affect high qualified minority applicants? Evidence from California and Texas. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. Carnevale, A.P., & Rose, S.J. (2003). Socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and selective college admissions. New York, NY: Century Foundation.
16. College Board. (1999). 1999 college bound seniors: A profile of SAT program test takers. Summary reporting service. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://professionals.collegeboard.com/data-reportsresearch/sat/archived/1999.
17. College Board. (2007). SAT data tables: Interpreting SAT and SAT subject test scores: SAT percentile ranks. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://professionals.collegeboard.com/data-reportsresearch/sat/data-tables.
18. Contreras, F.E. (2005). The reconstruction of merit post-Proposition 209. Educational Policy, 19(2), 371-395.
19. Crouse, J., & Trusheim, D. (1988). The case against the SAT. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Dale, S., & Krueger, A. (2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1491-1528.
21. Dehejia, R.H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in non-experimental studies: Re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1053-1062.
22. Desjardins, S.L., & McCall, B.P. (2006). The impact of the Gates recipients program on the college enrollment, borrowing and work behavior of low-income minority students. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
23. Dowd, A.C., Cheslock, J., & Melguizo, T. (2008). Transfer access from community colleges and the distribution of elite higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 1-31.
24. Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.
25. Duffy, E., & Goldberg, E. (1998). Crafting a class: College admissions and financial aid, 1955-1994. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Fisher, C.S., Hout, M., Sanchez, M., Lucas, S.R., Swidler, A., & Voss, K. (1996). Inequality by design: Cracking the bell curve myth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Heckman, J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411-482.
28. Heller, D.E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 624-659.
29. Hoxby, C. (1997). How the changing structure of U.S. higher education explains college tuition (NBER Working Paper No. 6323). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. Kane, T. (1998). Racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 431-456). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31. Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
32. Light, A., & Strayer, W. (2000). Determinants of college completion: School quality or student ability? Journal of Human Resources, 35(2), 298-332.
33. Long, B.T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 271-296.
34. Long, M.C. (2004). College applications and the effect of affirmative action. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 319-342.
35. Long, M.C. (2008). College quality and early adult outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 588-602.
36. Melguizo, T. (2003). What were the types of colleges that were doing a better job graduating students in the 1980s and 1990s? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University School of Education, Stanford, CA.
37. Melguizo, T. (2008). Quality matters: Assessing the impact of selective institutions on minority college completion rates. Research in Higher Education, 49(3), 214-236.
38. Merkowitz, D. (2004). Opportunities answered: Summary research findings on the Gates Millennium Recipients Program. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Improving access and college success for diverse students: Studies of the Gates Millennium Recipients Program (pp. 1-22). New York, NY: AMS Press.
39. Mortenson, T. (2006, May). Inherited opportunity for higher education. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
40. National Opinion Research Center. (2003). Gates millennium recipients tracking and longitudinal study: Year 1 final report. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved fromhttps://norc.gatesrecipientsresearch.org/docSearch.aspx?xIsBrowse=1&.
41. National Opinion Research Center. (2006). The inaugural cohort of the Gates Millennium Recipients the first few years after high school: A comparative analysis of the background characteristics, early outcomes, and experiences of the entering fresh-man class of 2000. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved fromhttps://norc.gatesrecipientsresearch.org/docSearch.aspx?xIsBrowse=1&.
42. Nieli, R. (2004). The changing shape of the river: Affirmative action recent social science research. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nas.org/reports/river_change/affirm-act_soc-sci.pdf.
43. Perna, L. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99-157). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
44. Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
45. Reynolds, C.L., & Desjardins, S.L. (2009). The use of matching methods in higher education research: Answering whether attendance at a 2-year institution results in differences in educational attainment. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and practice (Vol. 24, pp. 47-97). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
46. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
47. Rothstein, J.M. (2004). College performance predictors and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 297-317.
48. Sacks, P. (2000). Standardized minds: The high price of American testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
49. Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., & Shavelson, R. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs: A think tank white paper. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
50. Sedlacek, W.E. (1998). Admissions in higher education: Measuring cognitive and non-cognitive variables. In D. J. Wilds & R. Wilson (Eds.), Minorities in higher education 1997-1998: Sixteenth annual status report (pp.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
51. Sedlacek, W.E. (2003). Alternative measures in admissions and recipientship selection. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 263-272.
52. Sedlacek, W.E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Non-cognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53. Sedlacek, W.E., & Sheu, H. (2004). Academic success of Gates Millennium Scholars. Retrieved fromhttps://norc.gatesscholarsresearch.org/welcome.aspx.
54. Snyder, T.D., Dillow, S.A., & Hoffman, C.M. (2007). Digest of education statistics, 2006 (NCES 2007-017). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
55. St. John, E.P., Cabrera, A.F., Nora, A., & Asker, E.H. (2000). Economic influences on persistence. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention (pp. 29-47). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
56. Sternberg, R.J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
57. Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (1997). America in Black and White: One nation, indivisible. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.
58. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59. Trent, W. (2004, April). Shaping access and participation: Exploring the implications of the Gates Millennium Scholarship. Presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved fromhttps://norc.gatesscholarsresearch.org/welcome.aspx.
60. Winship, C., & Morgan, L.M. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 659-707.
61. Wolfe, R.N., & Johnson, S.D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 55(2), 177-185.