Fit of pariser-parr-pople and hubbard model Hamiltonians to charge and spin states of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Verges J A ^a   Sanfabian E ^b   Chiappe, G ^b   Louis, E ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA DE MATERIALES DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Unidad Asociada Del CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954928051     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085120     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. S. F. Sousa, P. A. Fernandes, and M. J. Ramos, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 10439 (2007). 10.1021/jp072538y (Pubitemid 47317498)
2. S. Kümmel and L. Kronik, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 3 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.3
3. J. Tirado-Rives and W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 297 (2008). 10.1021/ct700248k
4. R. Pariser and R. G. Parr, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 466 (1953). 10.1063/1.1698929
5. J. A. Pople, Trans. Faraday Soc. 49, 1365 (1953).
6. J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London 276, 238 (1963). 10.1098/rspa.1963.0204
7. N. F. Mott, Metal Insulator Transitions (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990).
8. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996). 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13
9. J. Kondo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 37 (1964). 10.1143/PTP.32.37
10. A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
11. E. Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994). 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 (Pubitemid 24821628)
12. The Hubbard Model: Its Physics and Mathematical Physics, NATO Advanced Studies Institute, Series B: Physics, edited by, D. Baereswyl, J. Carmelo, D. K. Campbell, F. Guinea, and, E. Louis, (Plenum, New York, 1995), Vol. 343.
13. J. A. Vergés, E. Louis, P. S. Lomdahl, F. Guinea, and A. R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. B 43, 6099 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.6099
14. A. K. McMahan, J. F. Annett, and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6268 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.6268
15. M. S. Hybertsen, M. Schluter, and N. E. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9028 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9028
16. F. Mila, Phys. Rev. B 38, 11358 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.11358
17. E. B. Stechel and D. R. Jennison, Phys. Rev. B 38, 8873 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.8873
18. R. Oszwaldowski, H. Vázquez, P. Pou, J. Ortega, R. Pérez, and F. Flores, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, S2665 (2003). 10.1088/0953-8984/15/ 38/006
19. G. Chiappe and J. A. Vergés, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 8805 (2003). 10.1088/0953-8984/15/50/013
20. G. Chiappe, E. Louis, E. V. Anda, and J. A. Vergés, Phys. Rev. B 71, 241405 (R) (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.241405 (Pubitemid 41702930)
21. P. S. Cornaglia, H. Ness, and D. R. Grempel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 147201 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.147201
22. D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav, and M. A. Kastner, Nature (London) 391, 156 (1998). 10.1038/34373 (Pubitemid 28092469)
23. S. M. Cronenwett, T. H. Oosterkamp, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Science 281, 540 (1998). 10.1126/science.281.5376.540 (Pubitemid 28357364)
24. A. Zhao, Q. Li, L. Chen, H. Xiang, W. Wang, S. Pan, B. Wang, X. Xiao, J. Yang, J. G. Hou, and Q. Zhu, Science 309, 1542 (2005). 10.1126/science.1113449 (Pubitemid 41266476)
25. M. F. Crommie, Science 309, 1501 (2005). 10.1126/science.1117039 (Pubitemid 41266463)
26. G. Chiappe and E. Louis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 076806 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076806 (Pubitemid 44273891)
27. V. Madhavan, W. Chen, T. Jamneala, M. F. Crommie, and N. S. Wingreen, Science 280, 567 (1998). 10.1126/science.280.5363.567 (Pubitemid 28227755)
28. G. Chiappe, E. Louis, E. SanFabián, and J. A. Vergés, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195104 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.195104
29. P. Pou, R. Pérez, F. Flores, A. Levy Yeyati, A. Martin-Rodero, J. M. Blanco, F. J. García-Vidal, and J. Ortega, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4309 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4309
30. J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 65, 184502 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.184502
31. One can start a search from the two following recent discussions: T. A. Gloor and F. Mila, Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 9 (2004) 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00092-2
32. F. Lin and E. S. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. B 78, 085435 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.085435
33. D. H. Reid, Q. Rev. DC Nurses Assoc. 19, 274 (1965).
34. J. A. Vergés, G. Chiappe, E. Louis, L. Pastor-Abia, and E. SanFabián, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094403 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094403
35. J. A. Vergés, E. San-Fabián, L. Pastor-Abia, G. Chiappe, and E. Louis, Phys. Status Solidi C 6, 2139 (2009). 10.1002/pssc.200881713
36. F. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 9113 (2001). 10.1063/1.1413524 (Pubitemid 33128016)
37. F. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7372 (2002). 10.1063/1.1465405 (Pubitemid 34599052)
38. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993). 10.1063/1.464913
39. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
40. R. Colle and O. Salvetti, Theor. Chim. Acta 37, 329 (1975). 10.1007/BF01028401
41. Remember that Unrestricted-Hartree-Fock calculations do not provide wave functions with a defined total spin (only one component is a good quantum number).
42. B. R. Brooks and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 5092 (1979). 10.1063/1.437351
43. M. W. Schmidt and M. S. Gordon, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 49, 233 (1998). 10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.233
44. B. O. Roos, Adv. Chem. Phys. 69, 399 (1987). 10.1002/9780470142943.ch7
45. M. W. Schmidt, Kim K. Baldridge, Jerry A. Boatz, Steven T. Elbert, Mark S. Gordon, Jan H. Jensen, Shiro Koseki, Nikita Matsunaga, Kiet A. Nguyen, Shujun Su, Theresa L. Windus, Michel Dupuis, and John A. Montgomery, Jr., J. Comput. Chem. 14, 1347 (1993). 10.1002/jcc.540141112
46. K. Ohno, Theor. Chim. Acta 2, 219 (1964). 10.1007/BF00528281
47. G. Chiappe, E. Louis, E. SanFabián, and, J. A. Vergés (unpublished).
48. G. Chiappe, E. Louis, J. Galán, F. Guinea, and J. A. Vergés, Phys. Rev. B 48, 16539 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16539
49. E. H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1201
50. The performance of the parameters given in Ref., that is, t = - 2.71 eV and U = 3.3 eV for a pure Hubbard model, is clearly a step below present results. Deviations for the neutral and negatively charged multiplets is less than one eV but errors are well above 10 eV for all positively charged states.
51. The lower energy of states with one or two additional electrons shown by the states of the lower panel of Fig. clearly points to a stronger electron affinity of B3LYP results compared to MCSCF ones. Actually, energies of anions of large PAH are below the corresponding neutral ground states.
52. D. Baeriswyl, D. K. Campbell, and S. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1509 (1986). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1509
53. S. Ramasesha, D. S. Galvão, and Z. G. Soos, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 2823 (1993). 10.1021/j100114a002
54. P. Sony and A. Shukla, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155208 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155208
55. A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009). 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109
56. S. Sorella and E. Tosatti, Europhys. Lett. 19, 699 (1992) 10.1209/0295-5075/19/8/007
57. T. Paiva, R. T. Scalettar, W. Zheng, R. R. P. Singh, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085123 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.085123 (Pubitemid 43406045)
58. R. Gygax, H. L. Peters, and J. I. Brauman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 2567 (1979). 10.1021/ja00504a011