Production of bioethanol and associated by-products from potato starch residue stream by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 953-959

  Hashem, Mohamed ^a,c   Darwish, Soumia M I ^b  

^a KING KHALID UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b Assiut University   (Egypt)

^c Assiut University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Bio ethanol; By products; Fermentation; Residue stream; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Zinc

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE COMPOUNDS; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVES; ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; POTATO STARCHES; S.CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOETHANOL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HYDRAULICS; STARCH; ZINC;

YEAST;

AMMONIUM; BIOFUEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; NITRATE; POTATO; STARCH; YEAST; ZINC;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 77954862223     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Harkin T. Petruoleum and ethanol fuels: tax incentives and related G.A.O. works 2000, United States General Office, Washington.
2. Howard L. Biodiesel vs. other alternative fuels 1994, Bio-state Development Agency.
3. Ghobadian B., Rahimi H. Biofuel: past, present and future perspective. International Iran and Russian Congress of Agricultural and Natural Science 2004, Shahre- Kord University, Shahre Kord, Iran.
4. Wyman C.E. Biomass ethanol: technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu Rev Energy Env 1999, 24:189-226.
5. Prasad S., Singh A., Joshi H.C. Ethanol as an alternative fuel from agricultural, industrial and urban residues. Resour Conserv Recycl 2007, 50:1-39.
6. Kosaric N., Duvnjak Z., Stewart G.G. Fuel ethanol from biomass: production, economics and energy. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 1981, 20:119-151.
7. Wyman C.E. Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilisation. Applied energy technology series 1996, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 1-16.
8. Davis L., Rogersb P., Pearcec J., Peirisa P. Evaluation of Zymomonas-based ethanol production from a hydrolysed waste starch stream. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30:809-814.
9. Badger P.C. Ethanol from cellulose: a general review. Trends in new crops and new uses 2002, 17-21. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA. J. Janick, A. Whipkey (Eds.).
10. Verma G., Nigam P., Singh D., Chaudhary K. Bioconversion of starch to ethanol in a single-step by co-culture of amylolytic yeasts and Saccharomyces cerevisiae 21. Bioresour Technol 2000, 72:261-266.
11. Raimbault M. General and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. Electron J Biotechnol 1998, 1(3):174-188.
12. Surmely R., Alvarez H., Cereda M.P., Vilpoux O.F. Hydrolysis of starch, in collections. Latin American starchy tubers, book 3: technology, use and potentialities of Latin American starchy tubers 2004, NGO Raizes and Cargill Foundation, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 389-469. M.P. Cereda, O.F. Vilpoux (Eds.).
13. Tasić M.B., Konstantinović B.V., Lazić M.L., Veljković V.B. The acid hydrolysis of potato tuber mash in bioethanol production. Biochem Eng J 2009, 43:208-211.
14. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96:673-686.
15. Fuganti C., Grasselli P. Stereochemistry and synthetic application of products of fermentation of α, β-unsaturated aromatic aldehydes by baker's yeast. Enzymes in organic synthesis 1985, vol. 111. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 112-125.
16. NTP Report on carcinogens 1994, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC. 7th ed.
17. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 1959, 31(3):426-428.
18. Tomas L.C., Chamberlain G.J. Colorimetric chemical analytical methods 1980, Tintometer Ltd., Salisbury, UK, pp. 3-5.
19. Kim K., Hamdy M.K. Acid hydrolysis of sweet potato for ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 1985, 27:316-320.
20. Garcia M.J., Rios G., Serrano R. Comparative physiology of salt tolerance in Candida tropicalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 1997, 143:1125-1131.
21. Norbeck J., Blomberg A. Metabolic and regulatory changes associated with growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 1.4 M NaCl-evidence for osmotic induction of glycerol dissimilation via the dihydroxyacetone pathway. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:5544-5554.
22. Lazić M.L., Rašković S., Stanković M.Z., Veljković V.B. Enzymatic hydrolysis of potato starch and ethanol production. Chem Ind 2004, 58:322-326.
23. Patle S., Lal B. Investigation of the potential of agro-industrial material as low cost substrate for ethanol production by using Candida tropicalis and Zymomonas mobilis. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:596-602.
24. Altintaş M.M., Ülgen KÖ Kirdar B., Önsan Z.I., Oliver S.G. Improvement of ethanol production from starch by recombinant yeast through manipulation of environmental factors. Enzyme Microb Technol 2002, 31:640-647.
25. Tuite M.F., Oliver S.G. Expression of heterologous genes. Saccharomyces 1991, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 178-80.
26. Nellaiah H., Karunakaran T., Gunasekaran P. Ethanol fermentation of cassava starch by Zymomonas mobilis NRRL B-4286. Biomass 1988, 15:201-207.
27. Siqueira P.F., Karp S.G., Carvalho J.C., Sturm W., Rodríguez-Leń J.A., Tholozan J.-L., et al. Production of bio-ethanol from soybean molasses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae at laboratory, pilot and industrial scales. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:8156-8163.
28. Nahvi I., Emtiazi G., Alkabi L. Isolation of a flocculating Saccharomyces cerevisiae and investigation of its performance in the fermentation of beet molasses to ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23:481-486.
29. Ergun M., Mutlu S.F. Application of a statistical technique to the production of ethanol from sugar beet molasses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol 2000, 73:251-255.
30. IARC Pharmaceutical drugs. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans 1990, vol. 50. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, p. 415.
31. Arnold R., Rinke A., Schmidt C., Hofbauer L. Chemotherapy. Best practice and research. Clin Gastroenterol 2005, 19(4):649-656.