Non-Photorealistic Rendering and the science of art

NPAR Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 147-157

  Hertzmann, Aaron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NON-PHOTOREALISTIC RENDERING; OPEN PROBLEMS; VISUAL ARTS;

ANIMATION;

EID: 77954731871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1809939.1809957     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. AGRAWALA, M., AND STOLTE, C. 2001. Rendering Effective Route Maps: Improving Usability Through Generalization. In Proc. SIGGRAPH.
2. ALEXANDER, R. M. 1996. Optima for Animals, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.
3. ALEXANDER, R. M. 2001. Design By Numbers. Nature 412 (Aug.), 591.
4. CAVANAGH, P. 2005. The artist as neuroscientist. Nature 434, 7031, 301-307.
5. CHATER, N., TENENBAUM, J. B., AND YUILLE, A. 2006. Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 7 (July).
6. COLE, F., GOLOVINSKIY, A., LIMPAECHER, A., BARROS, H. S., FINKELSTEIN, A., FUNKHOUSER, T., AND RUSINKIEWICZ, S. 2008. Where Do People Draw Lines? ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3.
7. COLE, F., SANIK, K., DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., FUNKHOUSER, T., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., , AND SINGH, M. 2009. How Well Do Line Drawings Depict Shape? ACM Trans. Graphics 28, 3.
8. DAW, N. C., AND COURVILLE, A. C. 2007. The pigeon as particle filter. In Proc. NIPS.
9. DAYAN, P., AND DAW, N. D. 2008. Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neurosc. 8, 4, 429-453.
10. DECARLO, D., AND SANTELLA, A. 2002. Stylization and Abstraction of Photographs. ACM Trans. Graphics 21, 3 (July).
11. DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND SANTELLA, A. 2003. Suggestive Contours for Conveying Shape. ACM Trans. Graphics 22, 3 (July), 848-855.
12. DENNING, P. J. 2007. Computing is a Natural Science. Comm. ACM 10, 7.
13. DOYA, K., ISHII, S., POUGET, A., AND RAO, R. P. N., Eds. 2007. Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding. MIT Press.
14. DURAND, F. 2002. An Invitation to Discuss Computer Depiction. In Proc. NPAR.
15. DUTTON, D. 2009. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. Bloomsbury Press.
16. FREEMAN, W. T. 1996. The generic viewpoint assumption in a Bayesian framework. In Perception as Bayesian Inference, D. Knill and W. Richards, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 365-390.
17. GLASNER, D., BAGON, S., AND IRANI, M. 2009. Super-Resolution From a Single Image. In Proc. ICCV.
18. GOLDMAN, D. B., CURLESS, B., HERTZMANN, A., AND SEITZ, S. 2005. Shape and Spatially Varying BRDFs from Photometric Stereo. In Proc. ICCV.
19. GOOCH, B., REINHARD, E., AND GOOCH, A. 2004. Human Facial Illustration: Creation and Psychophysical Evaluation. ACM Trans. Graphics 23, 1, 27-44. (Pubitemid 44743513)
20. GOODWIN, T., VOLLICK, I., AND HERTZMANN, A. 2007. Isophote Distance: A Shading Approach to Artistic Stroke Thickness. In Proc. NPAR.
21. GOULD, S. J., AND LEWONTIN, R. C. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 205, 581-598.
22. GRABLI, S., TURQUIN, E., DURAND, F., AND SILLION, F. 2004. Programmable Style for NPR Line Drawing. In EGSR.
23. GREENBERG, S., AND BUXTON, B. 2008. Usability Evaluation Considered Harmful (Some of the Time). In Proc. CHI.
24. GRIFFITHS, T. L., AND TENENBAUM, J. B. 2006. Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science 17, 767-773.
25. HAEBERLI, P. E. 1990. Paint By Numbers: Abstract Image Representations. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, vol. 24, 207-214.
26. HERTZMANN, A. 1998. Painterly Rendering with Curved Brush Strokes of Multiple Sizes. In SIGGRAPH 98 Conference Proceedings, 453-460.
27. HERTZMANN, A. 2001. Paint By Relaxation. Proc. CGI.
28. HERTZMANN, A. 2003. A Survey of Stroke-Based Rendering. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 23, 4 (July/August).
29. HUGHES, J. M., GRAHAM, D. J., AND ROCKMORE, D. N. 2010. Quantification of artistic style through sparse coding analysis in the drawings of Pieter Bruegel the Elder. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 107, 4, 1279-1283.
30. ISENBERG, T., NEUMANN, P., CARPENDALE, S., SOUSA, M. C., AND JORGE, J. A. 2006. Non-Photorealistic Rendering in Context: An Observational Study. In Proc. NPAR, 115-126.
31. JAYNES, E. T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science.
32. JUDD, T., DURAND, F., AND ADELSON, E. 2007. Apparent Ridges for Line Drawing. ACM Trans. Graphics.
33. KAWABATA, H., AND ZEKI, S. 2004. Neural Correlates of Beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1699-1705.
34. KEMP, M. 2009. Art history's window onto the mind. Nature 461, 882-883.
35. KERSTEN, D., MAMASSIAN, P., AND YUILLE, A. 2004. Object Perception as Bayesian Inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 271-304.
36. KÖRDING, K. P., AND WOLPERT, D. 2004. Bayesian Integration in Sensorimotor Learning. Nature 427, 244-247.
37. KOSARA, R., HEALEY, C. G., INTERRANTE, V., LAIDLAW, D. H., AND WARE, C. 2003. Thoughts on User Studies: Why, How, and When. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 23, 4, 20-25.
38. LEE, S., OLSEN, S., AND GOOCH, B. 2006. Interactive 3D Fluid Jet Painting. In Proc. NPAR.
39. LEE, Y., MARKOSIAN, L., LEE, S., AND HUGHES, J. F. 2007. Line drawings via abstracted shading. ACM Trans. Graphics.
40. LITWINOWICZ, P. 1997. Processing Images and Video for an Impressionist Effect. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 407-414.
41. LIU, L., CHEN, R., WOLF, L., AND COHEN-OR, D. 2010. Optimizing Photo Composition. In Proc. EG.
42. LYU, S., ROCKMORE, D., AND FARID, H. 2004. A Digital Technique for Art Authentication. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101, 49, 17006-17010.
43. MARR, D. 1982. Vision. W. H. Freeman.
44. PARKER, G. A., AND SMITH, J. M. 1990. Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348 (Nov.), 27-33.
45. RAMACHANDRAN, V., AND HIRSTEIN, W. 1999. The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. J. of Consciousness Studies 6, 6-7, 15-51.
46. RAO, R. P. N., OLSHAUSEN, B. A., AND LEWICKI, M. S., Eds. 2002. Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function. MIT Press.
47. SACKS, O. 1996. An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales. Vintage.
48. SANTELLA, A., AND DECARLO, D. 2004. Visual Interest and NPR: an Evaluation and Manifesto. In Proc. NPAR.
49. SANTELLA, A., AGRAWALA, M., DECARLO, D., SALESIN, D., AND COHEN, M. 2006. Gaze-Based Interaction for Semi-Automatic Photo Cropping. In Proc. CHI, 771-780.
50. SCHMIDT, R., KHAN, A., KURTENBACH, G., AND SINGH, K. 2009. On Expert Performance in 3D Curve-Drawing Tasks. In Proc. SBIM.
51. SECORD, A. 2002. Weighted Voronoi Stippling. In Proc. NPAR, 27-43.
52. SILVERS, R. S. 1996. Photomosaics: Putting Pictures in their Place. Master's thesis, MIT.
53. SMITH, J. 1998. Bone, Volume 5: Rock Jaw: Master of the Eastern Border. Cartoon Books.
54. SUTHERLAND, W. J. 2005. The best solution. Nature 435 (June), 569.
55. TAYLOR, R. P., MICOLICH, A. P., AND JONAS, D. 1999. Fractal analysis of Pollock's drip paintings. Nature 399, 422-423.
56. TODOROV, E. 2004. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience 7, 9 (Sept.).
57. WANG, Z., BOVIK, A. C., SHEIKH, H. R., AND SIMONCELLI, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 13, 4, 600-612.
58. WEISS, Y., SIMONCELLI, E., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2002. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 5, 6 (June).
59. WIKIPEDIA, 2010. Ambiguity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity.
60. WINKENBACH, G., AND SALESIN, D. H. 1994. Computer-Generated Pen-And-Ink Illustration. In Proc. SIGGRAPH.
61. WINNEMÖLLER, H., OLSEN, S. C., AND GOOCH, B. 2006. Real-Time Video Abstraction. ACM Trans. Graphics 25, 3 (July).
62. ZEKI, S. 1998. Inner Vision: an exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press.