The evaluation of investment projects within the territory of development

Transport

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Griškeviciute Gečiene, Aušrine ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Multi criteria analysis; Negative transport impacts; Social costs; Socio economic evaluation; Sustainable development; Transport system infrastructure

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION;

MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS; NEGATIVE TRANSPORT IMPACTS; SOCIAL COST; SOCIOECONOMIC EVALUATION; TRANSPORT SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURES;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 77954699123     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/transport.2010.25     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Antov, D.; Abel, K.; Sürje, P.; Rõuk, H.; Rõivas, T. 2009. Speed reduction effects of urban roundabouts, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 4(1):22-26. doi:10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.22-26
2. Automobiliu keliu investiciju vadovas [Guide to automobile road investment]. 2006. Lithunian Road Administration under the Ministry of Transport and Communications. KIV-06-1. 85 p. (in Lithuanian).
3. Bekef, Z.; Kiss, L. N.; Tanczos, K. 2003. Multicriteria analysis of the financial feasibility of transport infrastructure projects in Hungary, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 41(1):105-126.
4. Bello-Dambatta, A.; Farmani, R.; Javadi, A. A.; Evans, B. M. 2009. The analytical hierarchy process for contaminated land management, Advanced Engineering Informatics 23(4):433-441. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.006
5. Bhagwat, R.; Sharma, M. K. 2009. An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model for performance measurement of supply chain management, Production Planning & Control 20(8):678-690. doi:10.1080/09537280903069897
6. Bivainis, J.; Butkevičius, A. 2003. Methodologic aspects of evaluation of state budget programmes, Journal of Business Economics and Management 4(1):53-61.
7. Brans, J. P.; Vincke, P. 1985. A preference ranking organization method - (Te PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making), Management Science 31(6):647-656. doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
8. Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Peldschus, F.; Turskis, Z. 2008. Multi-objective decision-making for road design, Transport 23(3):183-193. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.183-193
9. Bruinsma, F.; Koetse, M.; Rietveld, P.; Vreeker R. 2001. Social Costs of Land Use Claim for Transport Infrastructure: a Survey for the Netherlands. 25 p. Available from Internet: .
10. Bulkeley, H.; Rayner, T. 2003. New realism and local realities: local transport planning in leicester and cambridgeshire, Urban Studies 40(1):35-55. doi:10.1080/00420980220080151
11. Burinskiene, M.; Rudzkiene, V. 2009. Future insights, scenarios and expert method application in sustainable territorial planning, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1):10-25. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.10- 25
12. Burinskiene, M. 2009. New methodology for sustainable development towards sustainable transportation system, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1):5-9. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.5-9
13. Burinskiene, M.; Rudzkiene, V. 2006. Assessment of strategic innovation, knowledge economy for sustainable development of regions, in WMSCI 10:10th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Vol VII, Proceedings, 139-144.
14. Burinskiene, M.; Ušpalyte-Vitkuniene, R. 2008. Integration of public transport and urban planning, in 7th International Conference Environmental Engineering, Vols 1-3, 1075-1080.
15. Cantos, P.; Gumbau-Albert, M.; Maudos, J. 2005. Transport infrastructures, spillover effects and regional growth: evidence of the Spanish case, Transport Reviews 25(1):25-50. doi:10.1080/014416410001676852 (Pubitemid 40134010)
16. Caulfeld, B.; O'Mahony, M. 2007. Evaluating the economic cost of air and noise pollution generated by transport, in European Transport Conference 2007, Leeuwenhorst Conference Centre, Te Netherlands 17-19 October 2007, 16 p. Available from Internet: .
17. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Greening Transport {SEC (2008) 2206}/COM/2008/0433 fnal/. 2008. European Commission. Available from Internet: .
18. Çaliskanelli, P.; Özuysal, M.; Tanyel, S.; Yayla, N. 2009. Comparison of different capacity models for traffic circles, Transport 24(4):257-264. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.257-264
19. Daunoras, J.; Bagdonas, V.; Gargasas, V. 2008. City transport monitoring and routes optimal management system, Transport 23(2):144-149. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.144-149
20. Eliasson, J. 2006. Cost-benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system, in European Transport Conference 2006, Strasbourg, France, 18-20 September 2006, 18 p. Available from Internet: .
21. Feng, C.-M.; Wang, S.-M. 2005. The fully economic evaluation for transport infrastructure project, in Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5:1778-1791. Available from Internet:
22. Figliozzi, M. A. 2008. Planning approximations to the average length of vehicle routing problems with varying customer demands and routing constraints, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1:1-8. doi:10.3141/2089-01
23. Ghionea, F. 2009. About the electre method applicabillity, Metalurgia International 14(Sp. Iss. 16):16-23.
24. Golub, S. S.; Tomasik, B. 2008. Measures of international transport cost for OECD countries, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No. 609, ECO/WKP (2008) 17. 30 p. doi:10.1787/18151973
25. Griškevičius, A.; Griškevičiene, D. 2004. The efficiency of investments into the projects of transport infrastructure development, in Transport Means 2004: Proceedings of the International Conference, 221-224.
26. Griškevičius, A.; Griškevičiene, D. 2007. The opportunities of comprehensive evaluation and fnancing of transport business projects, in Transport Means 2007, Proceedings, 175-178.
27. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund and Instrument for Pre-Accession. 2008. European Commission. Directorate General Regional Policy. Final Report Submitted by TRT Trasporti e Territorio and CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies 16/06/2008. 255 p. Available from Internet: .
28. Guy, G. B.; Kibert, C. J. 1998. Developing Indicators of Sustainability: US Experience, Building Research and Information 26(1):39-45. doi:10.1080/096132198370092
29. Herala, N. 2003. Regulating traffic with land use planning, Sustainable Development 11(2):91-102. doi:10.1002/sd.209 (Pubitemid 36659141)
30. Janáček, J.; Gábrišová, L. 2009. A two-phase method for the capacitated facility problem of compact customer sub-sets, Transport 24(4):274-282. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.274-282
31. Juškevičius, P.; Burinskiene, M. 2007. Quality factors of the residential environment in urban planning, International Journal of Environment and Pollution 30(3/4):471-484. doi:10.1504/IJEP.2007.014823 (Pubitemid 47442081)
32. Kinderyte-Poškiene, J.; Sokolovskij, E. 2008. Traffic control elements influence on accidents, mobility and the environment, Transport 23(1):55-58. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.55-58 (Pubitemid 351467667)
33. Kulkarni, R. B.; Miller, D.; Ingram, R. M.; Wong, C.-W.; Lorenz, J. 2004. Need-based project prioritization: Alternative to cost-benefit analysis, Journal of Transportation Engineering - ASCE 130(2):150-158. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-947X (2004) 130:2 (150)
34. Li, Sh.; Deng, W.; Lv, Y. 2009. Combined modal split and assignment model for the multimodal transportation network of the economic circle in China, Transport 24(3):241-248. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.241-248
35. Lithuanian Road Adminsitration under the Minsitry of Transport and Communications. 2002. Lithuanian Highway Project. Kaunas: VI̧ ŽTransporto ir keliu tyrimo institutas". 145 p.
36. Macharis, C.; De Witte, A.; Ampe, J. 2009. The multi-actor multi-criteria analysis methodology for the evaluation of transport projects: Teory and practice, Journal of Advanced Transportation 43(2):183-202. doi:10.1002/atr. 5670430206
37. Matis, P. 2010. Finding a solution for a complex street routing problem using the mixed transportation mode, Transport 25(1):29-35. doi:10.3846/ transport.2010.05
38. Matis, P. 2008. Decision support system for solving the street routing problem, Transport 23(3):230-235. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.230-235
39. McDonald, S.; Malys, N.; Maliene, V. 2009. Urban regeneration for sustainable communities: a case study, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1):49-59. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.49-59
40. Mesarec, B.; Lep, M. 2009. Combining the grid-based spatial planning and network-based transport planning, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1):60-77. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.60-77
41. Moss, T.; Fichter, H. 2003. Lessons in promoting sustainable development in EU structural funds programmes, Sustainable Development 11(1):56-65. doi:10.1002/sd.204 (Pubitemid 36225735)
42. National General Strategy: the Lithuanian Strategy for the Use of European Union Structural Assistance for 2007-2013. 2006. Available from Internet: .
43. Niewczas, A.; Koszalka, G.; Wrona, J.; Pieniak, D. 2008. Chosen aspects of municipal transport operation on the example of the city of Lublin, Transport 23(1):88-90. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.88-90 (Pubitemid 351466586)
44. Noya, A.; Clarence, E. 2007. The Social Economy: Building Inclusive Economies. OECD Publishing. 250 p.
45. Nystrom, B.; Soderholm, P. 2010. Selection of maintenance actions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): decisionmaking in railway infrastructure, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 6(4):467-479. doi:10.1080/ 15732470801990209
46. Odgaard, T.; Kelly, C. E.; Laird, J. J. 2005. Current practice in project appraisal in Europe, in European Transport Conference 2002, Strasbourg, France, 3-5 October 2005. 23 p. Available from Internet: .
47. Ojha, A.; Das, B.; Mondal, S.; Maiti, M. 2010. A stochastic discounted multi-objective solid transportation problem for breakable items using analytical hierarchy process, Applied Mathematical Modelling 34(8):2256-2271. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.034
48. Oppen, J.; Løkketangen, A. 2006. Arc routing in a node routing environment, Computers & Operations Research 33(4):1033-1055. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.09.004 (Pubitemid 41508806)
49. Pearce, D.; Atkinson, G.; Mourato, S. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. OECD Publishing, 1st edition. 316 p.
50. Planuojamos ukines veiklos poveikio aplinkai vertinimo vadovas [Guide on the Environmental Impact Assessment of Planned Economic Activities]. 2009. Lietuvos Respublikos Aplinkos ministerija [The Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania]. 108 p. Available from Internet: . (in Lithuanian).
51. Podvezko, V. 2009. Application of AHP technique, Journal of Business Economics and Management 10(2):181-189. doi:10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.181-189
52. Podvezko, V.; Podviezko, A. 2010. Dependence of multi-criteria evaluation result on choice of preference functions and their parameters, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(1):143-158. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.09
53. Podvezko, V.; Podviezko, A. 2009. PROMETHEE I Method Application for Identification of the Best Alternative, Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Teory and Practice] 10(2):84-92. doi:10.3846/1648-0627.2009.10.84-92
54. Poot, A.; Kant, G.; Wagelmans, A. P. M. 2002. A Saving based method for real-life vehicle routing problems, Journal of the Operational Research Society 53(1):57-68. doi:10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601252
55. Rich, J. H., Nielsen, O. A. 2002. Cost-benefit Evaluation of infrastructure doing it the hedonic way, in European Transport Conference 2002, Homerton College, Cambridge, 09-11 September 2002, 15 p. Available from Internet: .
56. Ruiz, R.; Maroto, C.; Alcaraz, J. 2004. A decision support system for a real vehicle routing problem, European Journal of Operational Research 153(3):593-606. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217 (03) 00265-0
57. Rus, G. 2006. Economic evaluation and incentives in transport infrastructure investment. OECD, Milan European Economy Workshops Working paper No. 2006-25. 29 p. Available from Intrenet: .
58. Szucs, G. 2009. Developing co-operative transport system and route planning, Transport 24(1):21-25. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.21-25
59. Single Programming Document of Lithuania 2004-2006. 2004. Available from Internet: .
60. Šarka, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Ustinovičius, L.; Šarkiene, E.; Ignatavičius, C. 2008. System of project multicriteria decision synthesis in construction, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4):546-565. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.546-565
61. Tamošiuniene, R.; Šidlauskas, S.; Trumpaite, I. 2006. The multicriterial evaluation method of the effectiveness of the investment projects, Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Teory and Practice] 7(4):203-212.
62. Tanczos, K.; Torok, A. 2007. Linear optimization model of urban areas' operating efficiency, Transport 22(3):225-228.
63. Ulubeyli, S.; Kazaz, A. 2009. A multiple criteria decisionmaking approach to the selection of concrete pumps, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(4):369-376. doi:10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.369-376
64. Vega, H. L.; Penne, L. 2008. Governance and institutions of transportation investments in U. S. mega-regions, Transport 23(3):279-286. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.279-286
65. Yuen, B.; Chor, C. H. 1998. Pedestrian streets in Singapore, Transportation 25(3):225-242. doi:10.1023/A:1005055225542 (Pubitemid 28519670)
66. Ziari, H.; Keymanesh, M. R.; Khabiri, M. M. 2007. Locating stations of public transportation vehicles for improving transit accessibility, Transport 22(2):99-104.