Multi-objective decision-making for road design

Transport

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 183-193

  Brauers, Willem Karel M ^a   Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ^b   Peldschus, Friedel ^b   Turskis, Zenonas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Alternatives; Decision making; MOORA method; Multi objective optimization; Road design

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HIGHWAY PLANNING; ROADS AND STREETS; TRANSPORTATION;

ALTERNATIVES; CONSTRUCTION PROBLEM; DISCRETE VALUES; MOORA METHOD; MULTI OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING; MULTI-OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION; ROAD DESIGN;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 53349156737     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.183-193     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allen, R. G. D. 1951. Statistics for economists. Hutchinson's University Library, London, 65, 73-74 and 198.
2. Antucheviciene, J.; Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2006. Modeling renewal of construction objects applying methods of the game theory, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(4): 263-268.
3. Arrow, K. J. 1974. General economic equilibrium: purpose, analytic techniques, collective choice, American Economic Review 1: 256.
4. Bardauskiene, D. 2007. The expert's estimates application in the preparation of city general plan, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 13(3): 223-236.
5. Brauers, W. K. M. 2008. Multi-objective decision making by reference point theory for a wellbeing economy, Operations Research International Journal, Springer, 8: 89-104. ISSN 1109-2858,
6. Brauers, W. K. M.; Ginevicius, R.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J. 2007. The European Union in a transition economy, Transformations in Business & Economics 6(2(12)): 21-39.
7. Brauers, W. K. M. 2004. Optimization methods for a stakeholder society. A revolution in economic thinking by multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
8. Brauers, W. K. M. 2002. The multiplicative representation for multiple objectives optimization with an application for arms procurement, Naval Research Logistics, Wiley Periodicals 49: 327-340.
9. Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2006. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control and Cybernetics, Systems Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences 35(2): 445-469. ISSN 0324-8569.
10. Chang, J.-R.; Chen, D.-H.; Hung, C-T. 2005. Selecting preventive maintenance treatments in Texas. Using the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution for specific pavement Study-3 sites, Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1933:62-71.
11. Frangopol, D. M.; Liu, M. 2007. Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization and life-cycle cost, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 3(1): 29-41.
12. Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2006. Assessing the financial state of construction expertises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12:188-194.
13. Hwang, C.-L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, Berlin, 186.
14. Jakimavičius, M.; Burinskienė, M. 2007. Automobile transport system analysis and ranking in Lithuanian administrative regions, Transport 22(3): 214-220.
15. Jakimavičius, M.; Mačerinskienė, A. 2006. A GIS-based modelling of vehicles rational routes, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(4): 303-309.
16. Jüttler, H. 1966. Untersuchungen zur Fragen der Operationsforschung und ihrer Anwendungsmöglichkeiten auf ökonomische Problemstellungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Spieltheorie. Dissertation A an der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
17. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2007. Decision support system for innovation with special emphasis on pollution, Internationaljournal of Environment and Pollution 30(3/4): 518-528.
18. Kalibatas, D.; Turskis, Z. 2008. Multicriteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method, Information Technology and Control 37(1): 79-83. ISSN 1392-124X.
19. Kapliński, O.; Janusz, L. 2006. Three phases of multifactor modelling of construction processes, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(2): 127-134.
20. Karlin, S.; Studden, W.J. 1966. Tchebycheffsystems: with applications in analysis and statistics. Interscience Publishers, New York.
21. Kashevskaya, E. 2007. Bases of quality management of construction and repair of highways, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(3): 101-109.
22. Kendall, M. G. 1948. Rank correlation methods. Griffin London.
23. Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives. Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, USA.
24. Körth, H. 1969a. Untersuchungen zur nichtlinearen Optimierung ökonomischer Erscheinungen und Prozesse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Quoitientenoptimierung sowie der Lö sung ökonomischer mathematischer Modelle bei Existenz mehrerer Zielfuntionen. Habilitationsschrift Humboldt - Universität Sektion Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Berlin.
25. Körth, H. 1969b. Zur Berücksichtigung mehrerer Zielfunktionen bei der Optimierung von Produktionsplanen, Mathematik und Wirtschafte: 184-201.
26. Laurinavičius, A.; Oginskas, R. 2006. Experimental research on the development of rutting in asphalt concrete pavements reinforced with geosynthetic materials, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(4): 311-317.
27. Leonovich, L; Kashevskaja, E. 2007. Selection of criteria for process monitoring at the operative level of road quality management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 13(2): 144-152.
28. Minkowsky, H. 1896. Geometrie der Zahlen. Teubner, Leipzig.
29. Minkowsky, H. 1911. Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Teubner, Leipzig.
30. Nowak, M. 2005. Investment projects evaluation by simulation and multiple criteria decision aiding procedure, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 11(3): 193-202.
31. Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G.-H. 2004. Compromise Solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156:445-455.
32. Peldschus, E 2005. Multiple-criteria analysis in the construction of motorways, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 11(1): 32-35.
33. Peldschus, E 1986. Zur Anwendung der Theorie der Spiele für Aufgaben der Bautechnologie. Dissertation B, TH Leipzig.
34. Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2005. Fuzzy matrix games multi-criteria model for decision-making in engineering, Informatica 16(1): 107-120.
35. Peldschus, F.; Vaigauskas, E.; Zavadskas, E. K. 1983. Technologische Entscheidungen bei der Berücksichtigung mehrerer Ziele, Bauplanung Bautechnik 37(4): 173-175.
36. Petkevičius, E.; Petkevičius, R.; Babickas, R. 2006. Investigation of asphalt concrete pavement quality of Lithuanian highways, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 1(2): 71-76.
37. Pogorelov, A. V. 1978. The Minkowski multidimensional problem, Winston and Sons, Washington D.C.
38. Ratkevičiute, K.; Čygas, D.; Laurinavičius, A.; Mačiulis, A. 2007. Analysis and evaluation of the efficiency of road safety measures applied to Lithuanian road, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(2): 81-87.
39. Schärlig, A. 1985. Décider sur plusieurs critères. Presses Polytechniques Romandes, Lausanne.
40. Spearman, C. 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things, American Journal of Psychology 88.
41. Spearman, C. 1906. A footrule for measuring correlation, British Journal of Psychology 89.
42. Spearman, C. 1910. Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology 271.
43. Stopp, F. 1975. Variantenvergleich durch Matrixspiele. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Hochschule für Bauwesen, Leipzig, Heft 2:117.
44. Šaparauskas, J.; Turskis, Z. 2006. Evaluation of construction sustainability by multiple criteria methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(4): 321-326.
45. Schabovicz, K.; Hola, B. 2007. Mathematical-neural model for assessing productivity of earthmoving machinery, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 13(1): 47-54.
46. Spulber, D. 1989. The second best score, International Economic Review 30(3): 623-631.
47. Su, Ch.-W.; Cheng, M.-Y.; Lin, F.-B. 2006. Simulation-enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(4): 285-291.
48. Tamiz, M.; Jones, D. F. 1996. Goal programming and pareto efficiency, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 2:1-17.
49. Tamiz, M.; Jones, D. F. 1995. Expanding the flexibility of goal programming via preference modelling techniques, Omega 1:41-48.
50. Tamiz, M.; Mardle, S. J.; Jones, D. F. 1996. Detecting IIS in infeasible Linear Programming using techniques from Goal Programming, Computers Operations Research 23(2): 113-119.
51. Thiel, T. 2006. A proposal of defining participant preferences in a decision aiding process with the participant representing a collective body, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(3): 257-262.
52. Tille, M.; Dumont, A.-G. 2003. The multicriteria decision making methods : a practical tool for design a sustainability road infrastructure, in Proceedings of the XXIInd PIARC World Road Congress. World Road Association - PIARC
53. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Zagorskas, J. 2006. Sustainable city compactness evaluation on the basis of GIS and Bayes rule, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10(3): 185-207.
54. Ugwu, O. O.; Kumaraswamy, M. M.; Wong, A.; Ng, S. T. 2006a. Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP). Part 1. Development of indicators and computational methods, Automation in Construction 15(2): 239-251.
55. Ugwu, O. O.; Kumaraswamy, M. M.; Wong, A.; Ng, S. T. 2006b. Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design, Automation in Construction 15(2): 229-238.
56. Ustinovichius, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-I) approach to the analysis of investments in construction, Control and Cybernetics 36(1): 251-268.
57. Van Delft, A.; Nijkamp, P. 1977. Multi-criteria Analysis and Regional Decision-making. M. Nijhoff, Leiden, Nl.
58. Viteikiene, M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2007. Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 13(2): 149-155.
59. Voogd, H. 1983. Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. Pion ltd., London, 86-87.
60. Weitendorf, D. 1976. Beitrag zur Optimierung der räumlichen Struktur eines Gebäude. Dissertation A, Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen, Weimar.
61. Zagorskas, J.; Türskis, Z. 2006. Multi-attribute model for estimation of retail centres influence of the city structure. Kaunas city case study, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(4): 347-352.
62. Zavadskas, E. K.; Zakarevicius, A.; Antucheviciene, J. 2006. Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions, Informatica 17(4): 601-618.
63. Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J. 2007. Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives, Building and Environment 42(1): 436-451.
64. Zavadskas, E. K.; Raslanas, S.; Kaklauskas, A. 2008a. The selection of effective retrofit scenarios for panel houses in urban neighborhoods based on expected energy savings and increase in market value: The Vilnius case, Energy and Buildings 40(4): 573-587.
65. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. (2008b). Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(2): 85-93.
66. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Peldschus, F.; Turskis, Z. 2007. Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS Method, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(4): 195-203.
67. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2008. A new logarithmic normalization method in game theory, Informatica 19(2): 303-314.
68. Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutiene, T. 2006. A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block's maintenance contracts: I-Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and determination of its selection criteria, Building and Environment 41: 621-632.
69. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Šarka, V. 1994. The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 1(3): 131-139.
70. Ziari, H.; Khabiri, M. M. 2007. Interface condition influence on prediction of flexible pavement life, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 13(1): 71-76.
71. Ziari, H.; Ameri, M.; Khabiri, M. M. 2007. Resilient behaviour of hot mixed and crack sealed asphalt concrete under repeated leading, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 13(1): 56-60.