Inverse reference in adults-elementary arithmetic

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-85

  Campbell, Jamie I D ^a   Alberts, Nicole M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Elementary arithmetic; Problem format; Procedural strategies

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77954675854     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0015720     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barrouillet, P., Mignon, M., & Thevenot, C. (2008). Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 233-251.
2. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
3. Campbell, J. I. D. (1999). Division by multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 245-275.
4. Campbell, J. I. D. (2008). Subtraction by addition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1094-1102.
5. Campbell, J. I. D., Fuchs-Lacelle, S., & Phenix, T. L. (2006). Identical elements model of arithmetic memory: Extension to addition and subtraction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 633-647.
6. Campbell, J. I. D., & Gunter, R. (2002). Calculation, culture, and the repeated operand effect. Cognition, 86, 71-96.
7. Campbell, J. I. D., & Robert, N. D. (2008). Bidirectional associations in multiplication memory: Conditions of negative and positive transfer. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 546-555.
8. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315.
9. Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43, 1-29.
10. Geary, D. C, Frensch, P. A., & Wiley, J. G. (1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 242-256.
11. Geary, D. C, & Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 6, 474-483.
12. Gilmore, C. K., & Bryant, P. (2006). Individual differences in children's understanding of inversion and arithmetical skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 309-331.
13. Hecht, S. A. (1999). Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1097-1107.
14. Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2008). Effects of problem size, operation, and working-memory span on simple-arithmetic strategies: Differences between children and adults? Psychological Research, 72, 331-346.
15. Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 157- 75.
16. LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., Daley, K. E., Buffone, L., Greenham, S. L., & Sadesky, G. S. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284-306.
17. LeFevre, J., DeStefano, D., Penner-Wilger, M., & Daley, K. E. (2006). Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 209-220.
18. LeFevre, J., & Morris, J. (1999). More on the relation between division and multiplication in simple arithmetic: Evidence for mediation of division solutions via multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 803-812.
19. LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 216-230.
20. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
21. Mauro, D. G., LeFevre, J., & Morris, J. (2003). Effects of problem format on division and multiplication performance: Division facts are mediated via multiplication-based representations. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 163-170.
22. Peters, G., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (submitted). Young adults' use of indirect addition on elementary subtractions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Rickard, T. C. (2005). A revised identical elements model of arithmetic fact representation. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 250-257.
24. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
25. Robinson, K. M., Ninowski, J. E., & Gray, M. L. (2006). Children's understanding of the arithmetic concepts of inversion and associativity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 349-362.
26. Seyler, D. J., Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2003). Elementary subtrac-tion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1339-1352.
27. Verschaffel, L., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Stassens, N., & Ghesquière, P. (in press). Doing subtraction through indirect addition: Outcomes and conclusions of three related studies. In R. Cowan (Ed.), Understanding number development (British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II nr 7). London: The British Psychological Society.
28. Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem size effect. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 331-346). New York: Psychology Press.