Replication is not coincidence: Reply to iverson, lee, and wagenmakers (2009)

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 263-269

  Lecoutre, Bruno ^a   Killeen, Peter R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; NOTE; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77954668781     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.263     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Ashby, F. G., & O'Brien, J. B. (2008). The prep statistic as a measure of confidence in model fitting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 16-27. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.16
2. Cumming, G. (2008). Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 286-300. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x
3. nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
4. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
5. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
6. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false [Electronic version]. PLoS Medicine, 2. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
7. Irwin, R. J. (2009). Equivalence of the statistics for replicability and area under the ROC curve. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 62, 485-487. doi:10.1348/000711008X334760
8. Iverson, G. J., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Prep misestimates the probability of replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 424-429. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.424
9. Killeen, P. R. (2005). Replicability, confidence, and priors. Psychological Science, 16, 1009-1012. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01653.x
10. Killeen, P. R. (2006). Beyond statistical inference: A decision theory for science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 549-562.
11. Killeen, P. R. (2007). Replication statistics. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 103-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Lecoutre, B., Lecoutre, M.-P., & Poitevineau, J. (in press). Killeen's probability of replication and predictive probabilities: How to compute and use them. Psychological Methods.
13. Miller, J. (2009). What is the probability of replicating a statistically significant effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 617-640. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.617
14. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F. J., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331