A Validation Model for Measurement of Acetabular Component Position

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 812-819

  Malik, Aamer ^a   Wan, Zhinian ^a   Jaramaz, Branislav ^b   Bowman, Gary ^c   Dorr, Lawrence D ^a  

^a GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Centinela Freeman Regional Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Anteversion; CT scan; Inclination; Total hip; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; STANDARDIZATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77954659964     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Jaramaz B., DiGioia A.M., Blackwell M., et al. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 70.
2. Barrack RL, Lavernia C, Ries M, et al. Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:569, vii.
3. Komeno M., Hasegawa M., Sudo A., et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2006, 29:1104.
4. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978, 60:217.
5. Blendea S., Eckman K., Jaramaz B., et al. Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg 2005, 10:37.
6. Wan Z., Malik A., Jaramaz B., et al. Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:32.
7. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 8.
8. Jolles B.M., Zangger P., Leyvraz P.F. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:282.
9. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Wan Z., et al. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, [Publish Ahead of Print].
10. Mian S.W., Truchly G., Pflum F.A. Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, 276:206.
11. Sullivan J.A., Vanhoutte J.J., Remondino B. Femoral neck anteversion in perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982, 185.
12. Stiehl J.B., Heck D.A., Jaramaz B., et al. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component. Comput Aided Surg 2007, 12:116.
13. Amiot L.P., Poulin F. Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 77.
14. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75:228.
15. Dorr L.D., Hishiki Y., Wan Z., et al. Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement. Iowa Orthop J 2005, 25:1.
16. Olivecrona H., Weidenhielm L., Olivecrona L., et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75:252.
17. Penney G.P., Edwards P.J., Hipwell J.H., et al. Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D-3-D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007, 54:1342.
18. Stem E.S., O'Connor M.I., Kransdorf M.J., et al. Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction. Skeletal Radiol 2006, 35:385.
19. Wines A.P., McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:696.
20. Saxler G., Marx A., Vandevelde D., et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning-a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 2004, 28:198.
21. ASTM Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method 1999, vol E691-E692. Philadelphia (Pa).
22. ASTM Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods 2002, vol E177-E190a. Philadelphia (Pa).
23. DiGioia A.M., Hafez M.A., Jaramaz B., et al. Functional pelvic orientation measured from lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:272.
24. Hassan D.M., Johnston G.H., Dust W.N., et al. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:80.
25. Lembeck B., Mueller O., Reize P., et al. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:517.
26. McCollum D.E., Gray W.J. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 159.
27. Tannast M., Langlotz U., Siebenrock K.A., et al. Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 144.
28. Tang W.M., Chiu K.Y., Kwan M.F., et al. Sagittal pelvic mal-rotation and positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: three-dimensional computer model analysis. J Orthop Res 2007, 25:766.
29. Pierchon F., Pasquier G., Cotten A., et al. Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994, 76:45.
30. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Colgan B.D. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 8.
31. Babisch J.W., Layher F., Amiot L.P. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:357.
32. Nishii T., Sugano N., Miki H., et al. Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:162.
33. Haaker R.G., Tiedjen K., Ottersbach A., et al. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:151.
34. Chen E., Goertz W., Lill C.A. Implant position calculation for acetabular cup placement considering pelvic lateral tilt and inclination. Comput Aided Surg 2006, 11:309.
35. Pettersson H., Gentz C.F., Lindberg H.O., et al. Radiologic evaluation of the position of the acetabular component of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1982, 23(3A):259.
36. Pollard J.A., Daum W.J., Uchida T. Can simple radiographs be predictive of total hip dislocation?. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:800.
37. Jackson D.M. Total hip prosthesis: real and apparent dislocation. Clin Radiol 1975, 26:63.
38. Jolles B.M., Genoud P., Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 174.