The effects of interfacial conditions and stem length on potential failure mechanisms in the uncemented resurfaced femur

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2107-2120

  Gupta, Sanjay ^a   Pal, Bidyut ^a   New, Andrew M R ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone density; Bone remodeling; Finite element analysis; Hip; Interface characteristics; Resurfacing; Uncemented

Indexed keywords

APPLIED LOADING; BONDED INTERFACE; BONE DENSITY; BONE INGROWTH; BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; CEMENTLESS FIXATION; COATED SURFACE; FAILURE MECHANISM; FE MODEL; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT-BONE INTERFACE; INTERFACE CHARACTERISTIC; INTERFACIAL CONDITIONS; MECHANICAL ENVIRONMENT; MICRO MOTION; NORMAL WALKING; STAIR-CLIMBING; STEM LENGTH;

DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BONE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; FEMUR; FEMUR FRACTURE; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURFACE PROPERTY; WALKING;

CEMENTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WALKING;

EID: 77954659812     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0007-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ANSYS User;s Manual. ANSYS v 11.0, ANSYS Inc., PA, USA, 2006.
2. Bergmann, G., G. Deuretzbacher, M. Heller, F. Graichen, A. Rohlmann, J. Strauss, and G. Duda. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 34:859-871, 2001.
3. Bernakiewicz, M., and M. Viceconti. The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications. J. Biomech. 35:61-67, 2002.
4. Bitsakos, C., J. Kerner, I. Fisher, and A. A. Amis. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. J. Biomech. 38(1):133-139, 2005.
5. Bücher, P., D. P. Pioletti, and L. R. Rakotomanana. Biphasic constitutive laws for biological interface evolution. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 1:239-249, 2003.
6. Destresse, B., M. C. Hobatho, and R. Darmana. Etude des proprietes mecaniques de l;os spongieux du tibia humain par une me¢thode ultrasonore. Innov. Tech. Biol. Med. 16:288-299, 1995.
7. Gebert, A., J. Peters, N. E. Bishop, F. Westphal, and M. M. Morlock. Influence of press-fit parameters on the primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants. Med. Eng. Phys. 31:160-164, 2009.
8. Gross, T. P., and F. Liu. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven year follow-up study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 90:32-37, 2008.
9. Heller, M., G. Bergmann, G. Deuretzbacher, L. Durselen, M. Pohl, L. Claes, and G. N. Duda. Musculoskeletal loading conditions during walking and stair climbing. J. Biomech. 34:883-893, 2001.
10. Huiskes, R., H. Weinans, H. J. Grootenboer, M. Dalstra, B. Fudala, and T. J. Sloof. Adaptive bone remodeling theory applied to prosthetic design analysis. J. Biomech. 20:1135-1150, 1987.
11. Huiskes, R., H. Weinans, and B. van Rietbergen. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effect of flexible materials. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 274:124-134, 1992.
12. Jacobs, C. R., J. C. Simo, G. S. Beaupré, and D. R. Carter. Comparing an optimal global efficiency assumption to a principal stress based formulation for the simulation of anisotropic bone adaptation to mechanical loading. In: Bone Structure and Remodelling, edited by A. Odgaard, and H. Weinans. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers, 1995, pp. 603-613.
13. Katrana, P., J. R. Crawford, S. Vowler, A. Lilikakis, and R. N. Villar. Femoral neck resorption after hip resurfacing arthroplasty-a comparison of cemented and uncemented prosthesis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 88(SII):234, 2006.
14. Kishida, Y., N. Sugano, T. Nishii, H. Miki, K. Yamaguchi, and H. Yoshikawa. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 86:185-189, 2004.
15. Lilikakis, A. K., S. L. Vowler, and R. N. Villar. Hydroxyapatite coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years followup. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 36:215-222, 2005.
16. McMinn, D., R. Treacy, and P. Link Pynsent. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 329:S89-98, 1996.
17. Moreo, P., M. A. Pérez, J. M. García-Aznar, and M. Doblaré. Modeling the mechanical behaviour of living bony interfaces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196: 3300-3314, 2007.
18. Morgan, E. F., and T. M. Keaveny. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J. Biomech. 34:569-577, 2001.
19. Ong, K. L., S. M. Kurtz, M. T. Manley, N. Rushton, M. A. Mahammed, and R. E. Field. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 88:1110-1115, 2006.
20. Pal, B. Biomechanical analysis of failure mechanisms and design considerations for femoral resurfacing implants: numerical and experimental investigations. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, 2010.
21. Pal, B., S. Gupta, and A. M. New. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. J. Eng. Med. 223:471-484, 2009.
22. Pilliar, R. M., J. M. Lee, and C. Maniatopoulos. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 208: 108-113, 1986.
23. Ramamurti, B. S., T. E. Orr, C. R. Bragdon, J. D. Lowenstein, M. Jasty, and W. H. Harris. Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 36:274-280, 1997.
24. Rancourt, D., A. Shirazi-Adl, G. Drouin, and G. Paiement. Friction properties of the interface between poroussurfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24(11):1503-1519, 1990.
25. Shimmin, A., P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell. Metalon-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 90:637-654, 2008.
26. Taddei, F., A. Pancanti, and M. Viceconti. An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med. Eng. Phys. 26:61-69, 2004.
27. van Rietbergen, B., R. Huiskes, H. Weinans, D. R. Sumner, T. M. Turner, and J. O. Galante. The mechanism of bone remodelling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. J. Biomech. 26:369-382, 1993.
28. Vandamme, K., I. Naert, L. Geris, J. Vander Sloten, R. Puers, and J. Duyck. The effect of micromotion on the tissue response around immediately loaded roughened titanium implants in the rabbit. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 115(1): 21-29, 2007.
29. Viceconti, M., R. Muccini, M. Bernakiewicz, M. Baleani, and L. Cristofolini. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J. Biomech. 33:1611-1618, 2000.
30. Wagner, M., and H. Wagner. Preliminary results of uncemented metal-on-metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacement arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 329: S78-S88, 1996.
31. Weinans, H. Mechanically induced bone adaptations around orthopaedic implants. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 1991.
32. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, B. van Rietbergen, D. R. Sumner, T. M. Turner, and J. O. Galante. Adaptive bone remodelling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation. J. Orthop. Res. 11:500-513, 1993.