Differential transcriptional analysis between red and white skeletal muscle of Chinese Meishan pigs

International Journal of Biological Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 350-360

  Li, Yang ^a   Xu, Zaiyan ^a   Li, Hongying ^b   Xiong, Yuanzhu ^a   Zuo, Bo ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANXI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Affymetrix; Differential transcriptional analysis; Longissimus doris; Pig; Soleus

Indexed keywords

DORIS; SUIDAE; SUS;

MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN;

ANIMAL; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SWINE;

ANIMALS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAINS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SWINE;

EID: 77954650696     PISSN: 14492288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.6.350     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Matsakas A, Patel K. Skeletal muscle fibre plasticity in response to selected environmental and physiological stimuli. Histol Histopathol. 2009; 24: 611-629.
2. Choi YM, Kim BC. Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest Sci. 2009; 122: 105-118.
3. Kim NK, Joh JH, Park HR, et al. Differential expression profiling of the proteomes and their mRNAs in porcine white and red skeletal muscles. Proteomics. 2004; 4: 3422-3428.
4. Maltin C, Balcerzak D, Tilley R, et al. Determinants of meat quality: tenderness. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003; 62: 337-347.
5. Chang KC, da Costa N, Blackley R, et al. Relationships of myosin heavy chain fibre types to meat quality traits in traditional and modern pigs. Meat Sci. 2003; 64: 93-103.
6. Chang KC. Key signalling factors and pathways in the molecular determination of skeletal muscle phenotype. Animal. 2007; 1: 681-698.
7. Karlsson AH, Klont RE, Fernandez X. Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality. Livest Prod Sci. 1999; 60: 255-269.
8. Klont RE, Brocks L, Eikelenboom G. Muscle fibre type and meat quality. Meat Sci. 1998; 49: 219-229.
9. Wood JD, Nute GR, Richardson RI, et al. Effects of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 2004; 67: 651-667.
10. Mallinson J, Meissner J, Chang KC. Calcineurin signaling and the slow oxidative skeletal muscle fiber type. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2009; 277: 67-101.
11. Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, et al. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999; 21(Suppl): S10-S14.
12. Campbell WG, Gordon SE, Carlson CJ, et al. Differential global gene expression in red and white skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001; 280: 763-768.
13. Bai Q, McGillivray C, da Costa N, et al. Development of a porcine skeletal muscle cDNA microarray: Analysis of differential transcript expression in phenotypically distinct muscles. BMC Genomics. 2003; 4: 8.
14. Tsai S, Cassady JP, Freking BA, et al. Annotation of the Affymetrix porcine genome microarray. Anim Genet. 2006; 37: 423-424.
15. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402-408.
16. Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Myosin isoforms in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1994; 77: 493-501.
17. Lefaucheur L, Ecolan P, Plantard L, Gueguen N. New insights into muscle fiber types in the pig. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002; 50: 719-730.
18. Ryu YC, Kim BC. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics, postmortem metabolic rate, and meat quality of pig longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Sci. 2005; 71: 351-357.
19. Chen HB, Li CC, Fang MD, et al. Understanding Haemophilus parasuis infection in porcine spleen through a transcriptomics approach. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10: 64.
20. Uitto VJ. Extracellular matrix molecules and their receptors: an overview with special emphasis on periodontal tissues. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1991; 2: 323-354.
21. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, et al. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol. 2001; 153:1175-1186.
22. Weston AR, Rogers RW, Althen TG. The role of collagen in meat tenderness. Professional Animal Scientist. 2002; 18: 107-111.
23. Pedersen ME, Kolset SO, Sørensen T, Eggen KH. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans and collagen in two bovine muscles (M. Semitendinosus and M. Psoas major) differing in texture. J Agric Food Chem. 1999; 47: 1445-1452.
24. Letterio J, Roberts A. Regulation of immune responses by TGF-beta. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998; 16: 137-161.
25. Herpin A, Lelong C, Favrel P. Transforming growth factorbeta-related proteins: an ancestral and widespread superfamily of cytokines in metazoans. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004; 28: 461-485.
26. Li X, Velleman SG. Effect of transforming growth factor-beta1 on decorin expression and muscle morphology during chicken embryonic and posthatch growth and development. Poult Sci. 2009; 88: 387-397.
27. Noirez P, Torres S, Cebrian J, et al. TGF-beta1 favors the development of fast type identity during soleus muscle regeneration. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2006; 27: 1-8.
28. Vial C, Zúñiga LM, Cabello-Verrugio C, et al. Skeletal muscle cells express the profibrotic cytokine connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2), which induces their dedifferentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2008; 215: 410-421.
29. Meyer-Ter-Vehn T, Gebhardt S, Sebald W, et al. p38 inhibitors prevent TGF-beta-induced myofibroblast transdifferentiation in human tenon fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 1500-1509.
30. Patient RK, McGhee JD. The GATA family (vertebrates and invertebrates). Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002; 12: 416-422.
31. Molkentin JD. The zinc finger-containing transcription factors GATA-4, -5, and -6. Ubiquitously expressed regulators of tissuespecific gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 38949-38952.
32. Morrisey EE, Ip HS, Lu MM, Parmacek MS. GATA-6: a zinc finger transcription factor that is expressed in multiple cell lineages derived from lateral mesoderm. Dev Biol. 1996; 177: 309-322.
33. Yin F, Herring BP. GATA-6 can act as a positive or negative regulator of smooth muscle-specific gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 4745-4752.
34. Yin F, Hoggatt AM, Zhou J, Herring BP. 130-kDa smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase is transcribed from a CArG-dependent, internal promoter within the mouse mylk gene. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006; 290: C1599-C1609.
35. Kanematsu A, Ramachandran A, Adam RM. GATA-6 mediates human bladder smooth muscle differentiation: involvement of a novel enhancer element in regulating α-smooth muscle actin gene expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007; 293: C1093-C1102.