Dynamic computation of change operations in version management of business process models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6138 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 201-216

  Küster, Jochen Malte ^a   Gerth, Christian ^a,b   Engels, Gregor ^b  

^a IBM RESEARCH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Model Synchronization; Model Transformation; Version Management

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; DYNAMIC COMPUTATIONS; GRAPH TRANSFORMATION; MODEL SYNCHRONIZATION; POSITION PARAMETERS; POTENTIAL DEPENDENCY; VERSION MANAGEMENT;

GRAPH THEORY;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 77954646468     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13595-8_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Alanen, M., Porres, I.: Difference and Union of Models. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 2-17. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
2. Biermann, E., Ermel, C., Taentzer, G.: Precise Semantics of EMF Model Transformations by Graph Transformation. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 53-67. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
3. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Pierantonio, A.: Managing Model Conflicts in Distributed Development. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 311-325. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
4. Corradini, A., Montanari, U., Rossi, F., Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Löwe, M.: Algebraic Approaches to Graph Transformation Part I: Basic Concepts and Double Pushout Approach. In: Rozenberg, G. (ed.) Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation. Foundations, vol. 1, pp. 163-245. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)
5. Csertán, G., Huszerl, G., Majzik, I., Pap, Z., Pataricza, A., Varró, D.: VIATRA: Visual Automated Transformations for Formal Verification and Validation of UML Models. In: Proceedings ASE 2002, September 2002, pp. 267-270 (2002)
6. de Lara, J., Bardohl, R., Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Attributed graph transformation with node type inheritance. Theor. Comput. Sci. 376(3), 139-163 (2007)
7. Eclipse Foundation. EMF Compare, http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/? project=compare
8. Fluri, B., Würsch, M., Pinzger, M., Gall, H.: Change Distilling: Tree Differencing for Fine-Grained Source Code Change Extraction. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33, 725-743 (2007)
9. Gerth, C., Küster, J.M., Engels, G.: Language-Independent Change Management of Process Models. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 152-166. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
10. Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G.: Detection of conflicting functional requirements in a use case-driven approach: a static analysis technique based on graph transformation. In: Proceedings ICSE 2002, pp. 105-115. ACM Press, New York (2002)
11. Kelter, U., Wehren, J., Niere, J.: A Generic Difference Algorithm for UML Models. In: Liggesmeyer, P., Pohl, K., Goedicke, M. (eds.) SE 2005, Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, LNI, vol. 64, pp. 105-116, GI (2005)
12. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R., Polack, F.: Merging Models with the Epsilon Merging Language (EML). In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 215-229. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
13. Küster, J.M.: Definition and validation of model transformations. Software and Systems Modeling 5(3), 233-259 (2006)
14. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C., Engels, G.: Dependent and Conflicting Change Operations of Process Models. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 158-173. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
15. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C., Engels, G.: Dynamic Computation of Change Operations in Version Management of Business Process Models. IBM Research Report RZ 3763, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory (January 2010), http://www.zurich.ibm. com/~jku/Papers/rz3763.pdf
16. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C., Förster, A., Engels, G.: Detecting and Resolving Process Model Differences in the Absence of a Change Log. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 244-260. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
17. Letkeman, K.: Comparing and merging UML models in IBM Rational Software Architect: Part 3. A deeper understanding of model merging. IBM Developerworks (2005)
18. Mens, T.: A State-of-the-Art Survey on Software Merging. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 28(5), 449-462 (2002)
19. Mens, T., Taentzer, G., Runge, O.: Analysing refactoring dependencies using graph transformation. Software and System Modeling 6(3), 269-285 (2007) (Pubitemid 47278595)
20. Object Management Group (OMG). Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.2
21. Rekers, J., Schürr, A.: Defining and Parsing Visual Languages with Layered Graph Grammars. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 8(1), 27-55 (1997)
22. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Disjoint and Overlapping Process Changes: Challenges, Solutions, Applications. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3290, pp. 101-120. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
23. Taentzer, G.: AGG: A Graph Transformation Environment for Modeling and Validation of Software. In: Pfaltz, J.L., Nagl, M., Böhlen, B. (eds.) AGTIVE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3062, pp. 446-453. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
24. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F.: Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 43-55. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
25. Weber, B., Rinderle, S., Reichert, M.: Change Patterns and Change Support Features in Process-Aware Information Systems. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 574-588. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)