Language-independent change management of process models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5795 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 152-166

  Gerth, Christian ^a,b,c   Küster, Jochen M ^a   Engels, Gregor ^c  

^a IBM RESEARCH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b International Graduate School of Dynamic Intelligent Systems   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Process model change management; Process model differences

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; COMMON DENOMINATORS; DIFFERENT PROCESS; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION; MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODEL; SOFTWARE ARTIFACTS;

ABSTRACTING; LINGUISTICS; MANAGEMENT; QUERY LANGUAGES;

MODELS;

EID: 77249089468     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2005)
2. Zimmermann, O., Tomlinson, M. R., Peuser, S.: Perspectives on Web Services: Applying SOAP, WSDL and UDDI to Real-World Projects (Springer Professional Computing), Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
3. Koehler, J., Häuser, R., Küster, J., Ryndina, K., Vanhatalo, J., Wahler, M.: The Role of Visual Modeling and Model Transformations in Business-Driven Development, In: Proceedings of GT-VMT 2006, pp. 1-12 (2006)
4. Nejati, S., Sabetzadeh, M., Chechik, M., Easterbrook, S.M., Zave, P: Matching and Merging of Statecharts Specifications, In: ICSE 2007, pp. 54-64. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)
5. Kelter, U., Wehren, J., Niere, J.: A Generic Difference Algorithm for UML Models, In: Liggesmeyer, P., Pohl, K., Goedicke, M. (eds.) Software Engineering 2005. LNI, vol. 64, pp. 105-116. GI (2005)
6. Eclipse Foundation: EMF Compare, http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/? project=compare
7. Alanen, M., Porres, L: Difference and Union of Models, In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G., (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 2-17. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
8. Pottinger, R., Bernstein, P.A.: Merging Models Based on Given Correspondences, In: VLDB, pp. 826-873 (2003)
9. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C. Förster, A., Engels, G.: Detecting and Resolving Process Model Differences in the Absence of a Change Log, In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 244-260. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
10. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C. Engels, G.: Dependent and Conflicting Change Operations of Process Models, In: Paige, R.R., Hartman, A. (eds.) ECMDA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 158-173. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
11. Object Management Group (OMG): Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.2
12. Object Management Group (OMG): Unified Modeling Language (UML): Superstructure (2005), http://www.um1.org
13. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK), Technical Report 89 (January 1992)
14. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS): Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WS-BPEL) Version 2.0., http://docs.oas1s-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/CS/wsbpel-v2.0-OS.html
15. Mendling, J., Lassen, K.B.,Zdun, U.: Transformation Strategies between Block-Oriented and Graph-Oriented Process Modelling Languages, In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2006. Band 2, pp. 297-312. GITO-Verlag (2006)
16. Kappel, G., Kapsammer, E., Kargl, H., Kramler, G., Reiter, T., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W., Wirnmer, M.: Lifting Metamodels to Ontologies: A Step to the Semantic Integration of Modeling Languages, In: [26], pp. 528-542 (2006)
17. van der Aalst, W.M.P, Hirnschall, A., Verbeek, H.M.W.: An Alternative Way to Analyze Workflow Graphs, In: Pidduck, A.B., Mylopoulos, J., Woo, C.C, Ozsu, M.T. (eds.) CAISE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2348, pp. 535-552. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
18. Sadiq, W., Orlowska, M.E.: Analyzing Process Models Using Graph Reduction Techniques. Inf. Syst. 25(2), 117-134(2000)
19. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F: Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition, In: Krämer, BJ., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC2007. LNCS, vol. 4749. pp. 43-55. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
20. Murata, T.: Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(4), 541-580(1989)
21. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F. Moser, S.: Automatic Workflow Graph Refactoring and Completion, In: Bouguettaya, A., Krueger, L. Margarla, T. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5364, pp. 100-115. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
22. Object Management Group (OMG): Meta Object Facility, http: //www.omg.org/mof/
23. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Disjoint and Overlapping Process Changes: Challenges, Solutions, Applications, In: Meersrnan, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3290. pp. 101-120. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
24. Giese, H., Wagner, R.: Incremental Model Synchronization with Triple Graph Grammars, In: [26]. pp. 543-557(2006)
25. Egyed, A.: Fixing Inconsistencies in UML Design Models, In: ICSE 2007, pp. 292-301. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)
26. Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.): MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)