Dependent and conflicting change operations of process models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5562 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 158-173

  Küster, Jochen M ^a   Gerth, Christian ^a,b   Engels, Gregor ^b  

^a IBM RESEARCH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL MODEL; CLASS DIAGRAMS; MANUAL INTERVENTION; PROCESS MODEL; STRUCTURAL DIAGRAM; VERSION MANAGEMENT;

PROCESS MONITORING;

EID: 70350680830     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02674-4_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. IBM WebSphere Business Modeler, http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/ wbimodeler/
2. Alanen, M., Porres, I.: Difference and Union of Models. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 2-17. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
3. Bottoni, P., Schürr, A., Taentzer, G.: Efficient Parsing of Visual Languages based on Critical Pair Analysis and Contextual Layered Graph Transformation. In: VL 2000, pp. 59-60. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)
4. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Pierantonio, A.: Managing Model Conflicts in Distributed Development. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 311-325. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
5. Corradini, A., Montanari, U., Rossi, F., Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Löwe, M.: Algebraic Approaches to Graph Transformation Part I: Basic Concepts and Double Pushout Approach. In: Rozenberg, G. (ed.) Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation. Foundations, vol. 1, pp. 163-245. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)
6. Dijkman, R.: A Classification of Differences between Similar Business Processes. In: EDOC 2007, pp. 37-50. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)
7. Eclipse Foundation. EMF Compare, http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/? project=compare
8. Ehrig, H., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamental theory for typed attributed graph transformation. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Parisi-Presicce, F., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3256, pp. 161-177. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
9. France, R., Rumpe, B.: Model-driven development of complex software: A research roadmap. In: Briand, L.C., Wolf, A.L. (eds.) International Conference on Software Engineering, ISCE 2007, Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering, FOSE 2007, Minneapolis, MN, USA, May 23-25, pp. 37-54 (2007)
10. Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G.: Detection of conflicting functional requirements in a use case-driven approach: a static analysis technique based on graph transformation. In: Proceedings ICSE 2002, pp. 105-115. ACM, New York (2002)
11. Heckel, R., Küster, J.M., Taentzer, G.: Confluence of Typed Attributed Graph Transformation. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2505, pp. 161-176. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
12. Kelter, U., Wehren, J., Niere, J.: A Generic Difference Algorithm for UML Models. In: Liggesmeyer, P., Pohl, K., Goedicke, M. (eds.) Software Engineering 2005, Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, 8.-11.3.2005 in Essen. LNI, vol. 64, pp. 105-116. GI (2005)
13. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R., Polack, F.: Merging Models with the Epsilon Merging Language (EML). In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 215-229. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
14. Küster, J.M.: Definition and validation of model transformations. Software and Systems Modeling 5(3), 233-259 (2006)
15. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C., Engels, G.: Dependent and Conflicting Change Operations of Process Models. IBM Research Report RZ 3727, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory (2009), http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~jku/Papers/rz3727.pdf
16. Küster, J.M., Gerth, C., Förster, A., Engels, G.: Detecting and Resolving Process Model Differences in the Absence of a Change Log. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 244-260. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
17. Lambers, L., Ehrig, H., Taentzer, G.: Sufficient Criteria for Applicability and Non-Applicability of Rule Sequences. ECEASST 10 (2008)
18. Letkeman, K.: Comparing and merging UML models in IBM Rational Software Architect: Part 3. A deeper understanding of model merging. IBM Developerworks (2005), http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/05/802-comp3/
19. Mens, T.: A State-of-the-Art Survey on Software Merging. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 28(5), 449-462 (2002)
20. Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R., D'Hondt, M.: Detecting and resolving model inconsistencies using transformation dependency analysis. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 200-214. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
21. Mens, T., Taentzer, G., Runge, O.: Analysing refactoring dependencies using graph transformation. Software and System Modeling 6(3), 269-285 (2007)
22. Object Management Group (OMG). The Unified Modeling Language 2.0 (2005)
23. Rinderle, S., Jurisch, M., Reichert, M.: On Deriving Net Change Information From Change Logs - The DELTALAYER-Algorithm. In: Kemper, A., et al. (eds.) BTW 2007. LNI, vol. 103, pp. 364-381. GI (2007)
24. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Disjoint and Overlapping Process Changes: Challenges, Solutions, Applications. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3290, pp. 101-120. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
25. Taentzer, G.: AGG: A Graph Transformation Environment for Modeling and Validation of Software. In: Pfaltz, J.L., Nagl, M., Böhlen, B. (eds.) AGTIVE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3062, pp. 446-453. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
26. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Leymann, F.: Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 43-55. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
27. Weber, B., Rinderle, S., Reichert, M.: Change Patterns and Change Support Features in Process-Aware Information Systems. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 574-588. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)