Scaffolding self-directed learning with personalized learning goal recommendations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6075 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 75-86

  Ley, Tobias ^a,b   Kump, Barbara ^c   Gerdenitsch, Cornelia ^b  

^a KNOW CENTER   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Adaptive Learning Systems; Adaptive scaffolding; APOSDLE; Layered Evaluation; Personalization; Self directed learning

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION MODELS; ADAPTIVE LEARNING SYSTEMS; DIFFERENTIAL CONTRIBUTION; DOMAIN MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; LAYERED EVALUATION; LEARNING GOALS; LEARNING PROCESS; PERSONALIZATIONS; PERSONALIZED LEARNING; SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING; USER MODELS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 77954571413     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Fischer, G., Scharff, E.: Learning technologies in support of self-directed learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 98(4), 1-32 (1998)
2. Lindstaedt, S., de Hoog, R., Ähnelt, M.: Supporting the Learning Dimension of Knowledge Work. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 639-644. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
3. Simons, P.R.: Towards a constructivistic theory of self-directed learning. In: Straka, G.A. (ed.) Conceptions of self-directed learning, Waxmann, pp. 155-169 (2000)
4. Choo, C.W.: The knowing organization. How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decision. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)
5. Mayer, R.E.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist 59(1), 14-19 (2004)
6. Narciss, S., Proske, A., Koerndle, H.: Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based environments. Computers in Human Behavior 23(3), 1126-1144 (2007) (Pubitemid 46073602)
7. Schnotz, W., Heiß, A.: Semantic scaffolds in hypermedia learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 25(2), 371-380 (2009)
8. Müller-Kalthoff, T., Möller, J.: The Effects of Graphical Overviews, Prior Knowledge, and Self-Concept on Hypertext Disorientation and Learning Achievement. J. of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 12(2), 117-134 (2003)
9. Hogan, K., Pressley, M.: Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books, Cambridge (1997)
10. Hannafin, M., Land, S., Oliver, K.: Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional design theories and models, pp. 115-140. Erlbaum, Mahwah/N.J (1999)
11. Vye, N., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., Barron, B., Zech, L.: SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In: Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A. (eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 305-346. Erlbaum, Mahwah/N.J (1998)
12. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J., Seibert, D.: Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemp. Educ. Psych. 29, 344-370 (2004)
13. Brusilovsky, P., Peylo, C.: Adaptive and Intelligent Web-based Educational Systems. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13, 159-172 (2003)
14. Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1-2), 87-110 (2001)
15. Lindstaedt, S.N., Ley, T., Scheir, P., Ulbrich, A.: Applying Scruffy Methods to Enable Work-integrated Learning. Europ. J. of the Informatics Professional 9(3), 44-50 (2008)
16. Ley, T., Kump, B., Ulbrich, A., Scheir, P., Lindstaedt, S.N.: A Competence-based Approach for Formalizing Learning Goals in Work-integrated Learning. In: EdMedia 2008, pp. 2099-2108. AACE, Chesapeake/VA (2008)
17. Korossy, K.: Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: A competence-performance approach. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 205, 53-82 (1997)
18. Ley, T., Kump, B., Albert, D.: A methodology for eliciting, modelling, and evaluating expert knowledge for an adaptive work-integrated learning system. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 185-208 (2010)
19. Lindstaedt, S., Beham, G., Kump, B., Ley, T.: Getting to Know Your User - Unobtrusive User Model Maintenance within Work-Integrated Learning Environments. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 73-87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
20. Brusilovsky, P., Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D.: The Benefits of Layered Evaluation of Adaptive Applications and Services. In: Weibelzahl, S., Chin, D., Weber, G. (eds.) Empirical evaluation of adaptive systems, Workshop at the UM 2001, pp. 1-8 (2001)
21. Weibelzahl, S., Lauer, C.U.: Framework for the evaluation of adaptive CBR-systems. In: Vollrath, I., Schmitt, S., Reimer, U. (eds.) Experience Management as Reuse of Knowledge, GWCBR 2001, Baden-Baden, Germany, pp. 254-263 (2001)
22. Ghidini, C., Rospocher, M., Serafini, L., Faatz, A., Kump, B., Ley, T., Pammer, V., Lindstaedt, S.: Collaborative enterprise integrated modelling. In: EKAW 2008, pp. 40-42, INRIA, Grenoble (2008)
23. Falmagne, J., Cosyn, E., Doble, C., Thiery, N., Uzun, H.: Assessing mathematical knowledge in a learning space: Validity and/or reliability. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Am. Educational Research Association (2007)
24. Kump, B.: A Validation Framework for Formal Models in Adaptive Work-Integrated Learning. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol. 5149, pp. 416-420. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
25. Kalyuga, S., Sweller, J.: Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educ. Technol. Research & Development 53(3), 83-93 (2005)