Toward a model of grammaticality judgments

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 273-330

  Bader, Markus ^a   Hussler, Jana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954543389     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226709990260     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bader, Markus & Josef Bayer. 2006. Case and linking in language comprehension - evidence from German. Heidelberg: Springer.
3. Bader, Markus & Jana Häussler. 2006. On the proper place of frequency information within a model of garden-path recovery. Presented at the 19th CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, City University of New York.
4. Bader, Markus & Jana Häussler. To appear. Word order in German: A corpus study. Lingua. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.007.
5. Bader, Markus & Julia Henninger. In preparation. Focus and verb-cluster formation. Ms., University of Konstanz.
6. Bader, Markus & Tanja Schmid. 2006. An OT-analysis of do-support in Modern German. Ms., Rutgers Optimality Archive, No.837-0606.
7. Bader, Markus & Tanja Schmid. 2009. Verb clusters in Colloquial German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12, 175-228.
8. Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72, 32-68.
9. Baroni, Marco, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi & Eros Zanchetta. To appear. The WaCky Wide Web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation Journal 23, 209-226.
10. Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 45-86.
11. Bornkessel, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2006a. The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113, 787-821.
12. Bornkessel, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2006b. The role of contrast in the local licensing of scrambling in German: Evidence from online comprehension. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 18, 1-43.
13. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Crocker, Matthew & Frank Keller. 2006. Probabilistic grammars as models of gradience. In Fanselow et al. (eds.), 227-245.
16. Dikken, Marcel den, Judy B. Bernstein, Christina Tortora & Raffaela Zanuttini. 2007. Data and grammar: Means and individuals. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 335-352.
17. Eisenberg, Peter. 2004. Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik, vol.2: Der Satz, 2nd edn. Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag.
18. Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
19. Fanselow, Gisbert, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.). 2006. Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Featherston, Sam. 2005a. That-trace in German. Lingua 115, 1277-1302.
21. Featherston, Sam. 2005b. The decathlon model of empirical syntax. In Marga Reis & Stephan Kepser (eds.), Linguistic evidence, 187-208. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Featherston, Sam. 2005c. Universals and grammaticality : Wh-constraints in German and English. Linguistics 43, 667-711.
23. Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 269-318.
24. Ferreira, Fernanda & John M. Henderson. 1991. Recovery from misanalysis of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 725-745.
25. Frazier, Lyn & Giovanni B. Flores d'Arcais. 1989. Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap-filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 331-344.
26. Green, David M. & John A. Swets. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
27. Häussler, Jana & Markus Bader. 2006. Does the subject-object preference follow from early assignment of thematic roles? Presented at the 12th Annual Conference on Architecture and Mechanisms for Language Processing, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
28. Hoberg, Ursula. 1981. Die Wortstellung in der geschriebenen deutschen Gegenwartssprache. München: Hueber.
29. Hopp, Holger. 2007. Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing. Groningen: Grodil Press.
30. Keller, Frank. 2000a. Evaluating competition-based models of word order. In Lila R. Gleitman & Aravandi K. Joshi (eds.), 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 747-752. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Keller, Frank. 2000b. Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
32. Keller, Frank & Theodora Alexopoulou. 2001. Phonology competes with syntax: Experimental evidence for the interaction of word order and accent placement in the realization of information structure. Cognition 79, 301-372.
33. Keller, Frank & Mirella Lapata. 2003. Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics 29, 459-484.
34. Keller, Frank & Antonella Sorace. 2003. Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German: An experimental investigation. Journal of Linguistics 39, 57-108.
35. Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch. 2004. A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment. In Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 173-181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch. 2005. The relationship between grammaticality ratings and corpus frequencies : A case study into word-order variability in the midfield of German clauses. In Marga Reis & Stephan Kepser (eds.), Linguistic evidence, 329-349. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
37. Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch. 2008. Comparing linguistic judgments and corpus frequencies as windows on grammatical competence: A study of argument linearization in German clauses. In Anita Steube (ed.), The discourse potential of underspecified structures, 179-192. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
38. Kirk, Roger E. 1995. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
39. Labov, William. 1977. Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In Robert Austerlitz (ed.), The First Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America - The scope of American linguistics, 77-133. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
40. Leirbukt, Oddleif. 1997. Untersuchungen zum "bekommen" -Passiv im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
41. MacMillan, Neil A. & C. Douglas Greelman. 1991. Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Maindonald, John & John Braun. 2006. Data analysis and graphics using R: An example-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Manning, Christopher D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. In Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics, 289-341. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. McDaniel, Dana & Wayne Cowart. 1999. Experimental evidence of a minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition 70, B15-B24.
45. Meng, Michael & Markus Bader. 2000. Ungrammaticality detection and garden-path strength: Evidence for serial parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 15, 615-666.
46. Meng, Michael, Markus Bader & Josef Bayer. 1999. Die Verarbeitung von Subjekt-Objekt-Ambiguitäten im Kontext. In Ipke Wachsmuth & Bernhard Jung (eds.), KogWiss99. Proceedings der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft, 244-249. St. Augustin: Infix Verlag.
47. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79, 682-707.
48. Ratcliff, Roger. 1978. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85, 59-108.
49. Sapp, Christopher D. 2006. Verb order in subordinate clauses from Early New High German to Modern German. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
50. Schmid, Tanja & Ralf Vogel. 2004. Dialectal variation in German 3-verb clusters. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7, 235-274.
51. Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Siewierska, Anna. 1993. On the interplay of factors in the determination of word order. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 826-846. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
53. Sorace, Antonella. 1992. Lexical conditions on syntactic knowledge: Auxiliary selection in native and non-native grammars of Italian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
54. Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76, 859-890.
55. Sorace, Antonella & Frank Keller. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115, 1497-1524.
56. Sprouse, Jon. 2007. Continuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1, 123-134.
57. Stevens, Stanley S. 1975. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: John Wiley.
58. Warner, John & Arnold L. Glass. 1987. Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 714-738.
59. Weskott, Thomas & Gisbert Fanselow. 2009. Scaling issues in the measurement of linguistic acceptability. In Sam Featherston & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics, vol.1 : Process, 229-245. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2004. Syntactic vs. post-syntactic movement. In Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (eds.), 2003 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association (CLA), 284-295. Montreal : Universitédu Québec à Montréal, Département de linguistique et de didactique des langues.
61. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2006. Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol.5, 229-343. Oxford: Blackwell.