That-trace in German

Lingua

Volumn 115, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1277-1302

  Featherston, Sam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Grammaticality; Island constraints; That trace; Universals

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944268856     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aissen, J., Bresnan, J., 2002. Categoricity and variation in syntax: The stochastic generalization. In: Talk and Handout at Conference on Gradedness, Potsdam, 23 October 2002
2. Andersson, S.-G., Kvam, S., 1984. Satzverschränkung im Heutigen Deutsch. Narr, Tübingen
3. Atkinson, M., 1992. Children's Syntax: An Introduction to Principles and Parameters Theory. Blackwell, Oxford
4. Bard E. Robertson D. Sorace A. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability Language 721 1996 32-68
5. Bayer J. Comp in Bavarian syntax The Linguistic Review 33 1984 209-274
6. Bayer J. Notes on the ECP in English and German Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanischen Linguistik 30 1990 1-55
7. Behaghel, O., 1928. Deutsche Syntax: Eine Geschichtliche Darstellung. Band3: Satzgebilde. Winter, Heidelberg
8. Boersma P. Hayes B. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm Linguistic Inquiry 32 2001 45-86
9. Bresnan, J., Shipra, D., Manning, C., 2001. Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In: Butt, M., King, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, Hong Kong, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 13-32
10. Bybee, J., Hopper, P., 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Benjamins, Amsterdam
11. Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague
12. Chomsky, N., 1964. Degrees of grammaticalness. In: Fodor J.A., Katz J. (Eds.), The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 384-389
13. Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Chomsky, N., 1977. On Wh-movement. In: Culicover P., Wasow T., Akmajian A. (Eds.), Formal Syntax. Academic Press, New York
15. Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
16. Chomsky, N., 1986a. Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Chomsky, N., 1986b. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger, New York
18. Chomsky N. Lasnik H. Filters and control Linguistic Inquiry 8 1977 425-508
19. Clark H.H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 1973 335-359
20. Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgements. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California
21. Cowart, W., 2002. Dialects in that-trace. In: Talk and handout at Conference on Gradedness, Potsdam, 23 October 2002 (written version in press at Chicago Linguistics Society 39, see http://www.usm.edu/~lin/CLSO3t3.pdf)
22. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., Plunkett, K., 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Fanselow, G., 1987. Konfiguationalität: Untersuchungen zur Universalgrammatik am Beispiel des Deutschen. Narr, Tübingen
24. Fanselow, G., Felix, S., 1987. Sprachtheorie : Eine Einführung in die Generative Grammatik. Francke, Tübingen
25. Featherston S. Coreferential objects in German: Experimental evidence on reflexivity Linguistische Berichte 192 2002 457-484
26. Featherston, S., 2004a. Bridge verbs and V2 verbs: The same thing in spades? In press at Zeitschrift fuer Sprachwissenschaft
27. Featherston, S., 2004b. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some wh-constraints in German. To appear in a volume of Lingua on linguistic data, editor Robert Borsley
28. Featherston, S., 2004c. Judgements in Syntax: Why they are good, how they can be better. In: Talk given at Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft annual conference in Mainz, 25.2.2004. Handout consisting of all slides available under http://www.sfb441.uni-tuebingen.de/~sam/papers/DGfS04.handout.pdf
29. Featherston, S., 2005. Universals and grammaticality: Wh-constraints in German and English. Linguistics, in press
30. Grewendorf, G., 1988. Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Narr, Tübingen
31. Grewendorf, G., 1995. German. A grammatical sketch. In: Jacobs J., von Stechow A., Sternefeld W., Vennemann T. (Eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 1288-1319. de Gruyter, Berlin
32. Haider H. Connectedness effects in German Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanischen Linguistik 23 1983 82-119
33. Haider, H., 1993. Deutsche Syntax - Generativ. Narr, Tübingen
34. Keller, F., 2000. Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh
35. Keller F. Asudeh A. Probabilistic learning algorithms and optimality theory Linguistic Inquiry 332 2002 225-244
36. Keller, F., Corley, M., Corley, S., Konieczny, L., Todirascu, A., 1998. WebExp: A Java Toolbox for Web-Based Psychological Experiments. Technical Report HCRC/TR-99, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh
37. Lasnik H. Saito M. On the nature of proper government Linguistic Inquiry 15 1984 235-289
38. Lenerz, J., 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Narr, Tübingen
39. Lodge, M., 1981. Magnitude Scaling: Quantitive Measurement of Opinions. Sage, Newbury Park, London
40. Lutz, U., 1996. Some notes on extraction theory. In: Lutz U., Pafel J. (Eds.), On Extraction and Extraposition in German. Linguistik Aktuell 11. Benjamins, Amsterdam
41. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., 1989. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. Paul, H., 1920. Deutsche Grammatik Band IV: Syntax. Niemeyer, Halle
43. Pesetsky, D., 1982. Paths and Categories. MIT Dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA
44. Pollard, C., Sag, I., 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
45. Pollard, C., 1996. On head non-movement. In: Bunt, H. (Ed.), Discontinuous Constituency (Natural Lanuage Processing 6). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 279-305
46. Poulton, E.C., 1989. Bias in Quantifying Judgements. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, London
47. Prince, A., Smolensky, P., 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report No. 2, Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University
48. Quirk, R., Svartvik, J., 1966. Investigating Linguistic Acceptability. Mouton, London
49. Reis M. Wer glaubst du hat recht? On so-called extractions from verb-second clauses and verb-first parenthetical constructions in German Sprache und Pragmatik 36 1995 27-82
50. Rumelhart, D., McClelland, J. and the PDP Research Group, 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing. Part I. Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
51. Schütze, C., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
52. Prince, A., Smolensky, P., 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, and University of Colorado, Boulder
53. Stechow, A. von Sternefeld, W., 1989. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Westdeutscher-Verlag, Opladen
54. Stevens, S., 1975. Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects. John Wiley, New York
55. Uszkoreit, H., 1987. Word order and constituent structure in German. In: CLSI Lecture Notes No. 8. CSLI, Stanford