A survey to establish performance standards for the production of transgenic mice

Transgenic Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 675-681

  Fielder, Thomas J ^a   Barrios, Laura ^b   Montoliu, Lluís ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

^c CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^d INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Embryo transfer; Embryo yield; Microinjection; Mouse strains; Oocytes; Superovulation; Transgenes

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; C57BL MOUSE; DBA MOUSE; EVALUATION; GENE TRANSFER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOUSE; PRODUCTIVITY; STANDARD; TIME; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; DATA COLLECTION; EFFICIENCY; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MICE, TRANSGENIC; TIME FACTORS;

MUS; MUS MUSCULUS;

EID: 77954537085     PISSN: 09628819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-009-9335-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Afifi AA, Clark V (1996) Computer-aided multivariate analysis, lifetime learning publications. Belmont, California.
2. Auerbach AB, Norinsky R, Ho W, Losos K, Guo Q, Chatterjee S, Joyner AL (2003) Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production. Transgenic Res 12: 59-69.
3. Brinster RL, Chen HY, Trumbauer ME, Yagle MK, Palmiter RD (1985) Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 4438-4442.
4. Canseco RS, Sparks AE, Page RL, Russell CG, Johnson JL, Velander WH, Pearson RE, Drohan WN, Gwazdauskas FC (1994) Gene transfer efficiency during gestation and the influence of co-transfer of non-manipulated embryos on production of transgenic mice. Transgenic Res 3: 20-25.
5. Crawley JN (2007) What's wrong with my mouse? behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken.
6. Doetschman T (2009) Influence of genetic background on genetically engineered mouse phenotypes. Methods Mol Biol 530: 423-433.
7. Giraldo P, Montoliu L (2001) Size matters: use of YACs, BACs and PACs in transgenic animals. Transgenic Res 10: 83-103.
8. Gordon JW, Ruddle FH (1981) Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Science 214: 1244-1246.
9. Leibo SP, DeMayo FJ, O'Malley B (1991) Production of transgenic mice from cryopreserved fertilized ova. Mol Reprod Dev 30: 313-319.
10. Moreira PN, Pozueta J, Pérez-Crespo M, Valdivieso F, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Montoliu L (2007) Improving the generation of genomic-type transgenic mice by ICSI. Transgenic Res 16: 163-168.
11. Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Boehringer R (2003) Manipulating the mouse embryo. A laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
12. Nottle MB, Haskard KA, Verma PJ, du ZT, Grupen CG, McIlfatrick SM, Ashman RJ, Harrison SJ, Barlow H, Wigley PL, Lyons IG, Cowan PJ, Crawford RJ, Tolstoshev PL, Pearse MJ, Robins AJ, d'Apice AJ (2001) Effect of DNA concentration on transgenesis rates in mice and pigs. Transgenic Res 10: 523-531.
13. Palmiter RD, Brinster RL (1986) Germ-line transformation of mice. Annu Rev Genet 20: 465-499.
14. Ritchie WA, Neil C, King T, Whitelaw CB (2007) Transgenic embryos and mice produced from low titre lentiviral vectors. Transgenic Res 16: 661-664.
15. Shinohara ET, Kaminski JM, Segal DJ, Pelczar P, Kolhe R, Ryan T, Coates CJ, Fraser MJ, Handler AM, Yanagimachi R, Moisyadi S (2007) Active integration: new strategies for transgenesis. Transgenic Res 16: 333-339.
16. Tada N, Sato M, Kasai K, Ogawa S (1995) Production of transgenic mice by microinjection of DNA into vitrified pronucleate stage eggs. Transgenic Res 4: 208-213.
17. Taketo M, Schroeder AC, Mobraaten LE, Gunning KB, Hanten G, Fox RR, Roderick TH, Stewart CL, Lilly F, Hansen CT et al (1991) FVB/N: an inbred mouse strain preferable for transgenic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 2065-2069.
18. van Keuren ML, Gavrilina GB, Filipiak WE, Zeidler MG, Saunders TL (2009) Generating transgenic mice from bacterial artificial chromosomes: transgenesis efficiency, integration and expression outcomes. Transgenic Res 18(5): 769-785.