Ileal amino acids digestibility of sorghum in weaned piglets and growing pigs

Animal

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1341-1348

  Mariscal Landin G ^a,b   Reis De Souza, T C ^c   Avalos, M A ^b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^c Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico   (Mexico)

Author keywords

amino acids; ileal digestibility; piglets; protein; sorghum

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77954532655     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110000273     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AOAC 2000. Official methods of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
2. Bansal S, Mishra A, Tomar A, Sharma S, Khanna VK and Garg GK 2008. Isolation and temporal endospermal expresion of α-kafirin gene of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. moench) var. M 35-1 for introgression analysis of transgene. Journal of Cereal Science 48, 808-815.
3. Bell JM and Keith MO 1989. Factors affecting the digestibility by pigs of energy and protein in wheat, barley and sorghum diets supplemented with canola meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 24, 253-265.
4. Bennic A 1982. Salivary proline rich proteins. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 45, 83-89.
5. Brand TS, Badenhorst HA and Siebrits FK 1990. The use of pigs both intact and with ileo-rectal anastomosis to estimate the apparent and true digestibility of amino acids in untreated, heat-treated and thermal-ammoniated high-tannin grain sorghum. South African Journal of Animal Science 20, 223-228.
6. Charlton AJ, Baxter NJ, Khan ML, Moir A J G, Haslam E, Davies AP and Williamson MP 2002. Polyphenol/peptide binding and precipitation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 1593-1601.
7. Corfield AP and Shukla AK 2003. Mucins: vital components of the mucosal defensive barrier. Genomic Proteomic Technology 3, 20-23.
8. Deplancke B and Gaskins HR 2001. Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73, 1131S-1141S.
9. Diario Oficial de la Federación 2001. Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Diario Oficial De La Federación, Miércoles 2 de Agosto. Segunda Sección.
10. Fan MZ and Sauer WC 1995. Determination of ileal apparent amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for pigs with the direct, difference, and regression methods. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2364-2374.
11. Fenton TW and Fenton M 1979. An improved procedure for determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59, 631-634.
12. Hagerman AE and Butler LG 1981. The specificity of proanthocyanidin- protein interactions. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 256, 4494-4497.
13. Haslam E 1998. Practical polyphenolics: from structure to molecular recognition and physiological action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Henderson JH, Ricker RD, Bidlingmeyer BA and Woodward C 2000. Rapid, accurate and reproducible HPLC analysis of amino acids. Amino acid analysis using Zorbax Eclipse AAA columns and the Agilent 1100 HPLC. Agilent Technologies Part No. 5980-1193E, 10pp.
15. INRA 1984. L'alimentation des animaux monogastriques: porc, lapin, volailles. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.
16. Jansman A J M 1993. Tannins in feedstuffs for simple-stomached animals. Nutrition Research Reviews 6, 209-236.
17. Jondreville C, van den Broecke J, Gatel F, Grosjean F, van Cauwenberghe S and Sève B 2001. Ileal digestibility of amino acids and estimates of endogenous amino acid losses in pigs fed wheat, triticale, rye, barley, maize and sorghum. Animal Research 50, 119-134.
18. Kim H, House WA and Miller DD 2004. Habitual tea consumption protects againts the inhibitory effects of tea on iron adsorption rats. Nutrition Research 24, 383-393.
19. Kondos AC and Foale MA 1983. Comparison of the nutritional value of low and medium tannin sorghum grains for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8, 85-90.
20. Lin FD, Knabe DA and Tanksley TD 1987. Apparent digestibility of amino acids, gross energy and starch in corn, sorghum, wheat, barley, oats groats and wheat middlings for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 64, 1655-1663.
21. Makkink CA, Berntsen P J M, op den Kamp B M L, Kemp B and Verstegen WA 1994. Gastric protein breakdown and pancreatic enzyme activities in response to two different dietary protein sources in newly weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2843-2850.
22. Mariscal-Landí G 1992. Facteurs de variation de l'utilisation digestive des acides aminés chez le porc. PhD. Thesis Rennes 1 University, 134pp.
23. Mariscal-Landín G, Avellaneda JH, Reis de Souza TC, Aguilera A, Borbolla GA and Mar. B 2004. Effect of tannins in sorghum on amino acid ileal digestibility and on trypsin (E. C.2.4.21.4) and chymotrypsin (E. C.2.4.21.1) activity of growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 117, 245-264.
24. Mariscal-Landín G, Reis de Souza TC, Parra S J E, Aguilera BA and Mar. BB 2008. Ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids from canola meal in weaned piglets and growing pigs. Livestock Science 116, 53-62.
25. Mehansho H, Clements S, Sheares BT, Smith S and Carlson DM 1985. Induction of proline-rich glycoprotein synthesis in mouse salivary glands by isoproterenol and by tannins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 260, 4418-4423. (Pubitemid 15092923)
26. Mitaru BN, Reichert RD and Blair R 1984. The binding of dietary protein by sorghum tannins in the digestive tract of pigs. The Journal of Nutrition 114, 1787-1796.
27. Montagne L, Piel C and Lallès JP 2004. Effect of diet on mucin kinetics and composition: nutrition and health implications. Nutrition Reviews 62, 105-114.
28. Mosenthin R, Sauer WC, Blank R, Huisman J and Fan MZ 2000. The concept of digestible amino acids in diet formulation for pigs. Livestock Production Science 64, 265-280.
29. Mossé J, Huet JC and Baudet J 1988. The amino acid composition of whole sorghum grain in relation to its nitrogen content. Cereal Chemistry 65, 271-277.
30. NRC 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
31. Oria PM, Hamaker BR and Smith S 1995. Resistance of sorghum α, β and γ kafirins to pepsin digestion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43, 2148-2153.
32. Price ML, Steve VS and Butler LC 1978. A critical evaluation of the vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 26, 1214-1218.
33. Ramírez RE, Anaya E A M and Mariscal LG 2005. Predicción de la composició n química del grano de sorgo mediante espectroscopia de reflectancia en el infrarrojo cercano (NIRS). Técnica Pecuaria en México 43, 1-11.
34. Reis de Souza TC, Mar. BB and Mariscal LG 2000. Canulación de cerdos posdestete para pruebas de digestibilidad ileal: desarrollo de una metodología. Técnica Pecuaria en México 38, 143-150.
35. SAS. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. User's guide, version 9.1. 2002. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
36. Sell DR, Reed WM, Chrisman CL and Rogler JC 1985. Mucin excretion and morphology of the intestinal tract as influenced by sorghum tannins. Nutrition Reports International 31, 1369-1374.
37. Shon KS, Maxwell CV, Southern LL and Buchanam DS 1994. Improved soybean protein sources for early-weaned pigs: II. Effects on ileal amino acid digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 72, 631-637.
38. Steel R G D and Torrie JH 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hil, New York.