University-based Economic Growth

The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 381-396

  Lendel, Iryna ^a   Allen, Phil ^b   Feldman, Maryann ^c  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University System of Georgia   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954498569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203882221-28     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Acs, Z. (2002). Innovation and the growth of cities. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
2. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1991). Real effects of academic research: comment. American Economic Review, 81, 363-367.
3. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1994a). RandD spillovers and innovative activity. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15, 131-138.
4. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1994b). RandD spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336-340.
5. Acs, Z., FitzRoy, F.R. and Smith, I. (1995). High technology employment, wages and university RandD spillovers: evidence from U.S. cities. In P. Reynolds et al., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
6. Adams, J.D. (2001). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. NBER Working Paper, 8292. Retrieved from NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) Working Papers database: http://www.nber.org.
7. Adams, J.D. (2002). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(3), 253-278.
8. Adams, J.D. (2004). Learning, internal research, and spillovers evidence from a sample of RandD laboratories. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0409.
9. Adams, J.D., Chiang, E.P. and Starkey, K. (2000). Industry-university cooperative research center. NBER Working Paper, 7943. Retrieved from NBER Working Papers database.
10. Adams, J.D. and Jaffe, A. (1996). Bounding the effects of RandD: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. NBER Working Paper, 5544. Retrieved from NBER Working Papers database.
11. Agrawal, A. and Cockburn, I. (2002). University research, industrial RandD, and the anchor tenant hypothesis. NBER Working Paper, 9212. Retrieved from NBER Working Papers database.
12. Almedia, P. and Kogut, B. (1994). Technology and geography: the localization of knowledge and the mobility of patent holders. Working Paper. Philadelphia, PA: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved September 7, 2003, from http://www.wharton.upenn.edu.
13. Almeida, P. and Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localisation of innovation. Small Business Economics, 9, 21-31.
14. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995). Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Arrow, K.J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economics Studies, 29, 155-173.
16. Audretsch, D. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 18-29.
17. Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1996). RandD spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630-640.
18. Audretsch, D. and Stephan, P. (1996). Company-scientist locational link: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, 86, 641-652.
19. Bania, N., Eberts, R. and Fogarty, M. (1993). Universities and the start-up of new companies: can we generalize from route 128 and Silicon Valley? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 761-766.
20. Beeson, P. and Montgomery, E. (1993). The effects of colleges and universities on local labor markets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(4), 753-761.
21. Berglund, D. and Clarke, M. (2000). Using research and development to grow state economies. Washington D.C.: National Governors’ Association.
22. Braczyk, H-J. and Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional governance structures in a globalized world. In Brabzyk, H-J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (eds) Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. London: UCL Press.
23. Campbell, T.I.D. (1997). Public policy for the 21st century: addressing potential conflict in university-industry collaboration. Review of Higher Education, 20(4), 357-379.
24. Caniels, M.C.J. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and economic growth: regional growth differentials across Europe. Cheltenham: Elgar.
25. Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475-496.
26. Chinitz, B. (1961). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. The American Economic Review, 51(2), 279-289.
27. Cohen, W., Florida, R. and Goe, W.R. (1994). University-industry research centers in the U.S. Pittsburgh, PA: Center for Economic Development, Carnegie Mellon University.
28. Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: origins of the concept. In Braczyk, H.J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (eds) Regional innovation systems. the role of governance in a globalized world. London: UCL Press.
29. Cortright, J. and Mayer, H. (2002). Signs of life: the growth of biotechnology centers in the U.S. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
30. David, P.A. (1999). Krugman’s economic geography of development. NEGs, POGs and naked models in space. International Regional Science Review, 22, 162-172.
31. de la Mothe, J. and Paquet, G. (1998). Local and regional systems of innovation as learning socio-economies. In de la Mothe, J. and Paquet, G. (eds) Local and regional systems of innovation (pp. 1-16). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
32. Desrochers, P. (2001). Local diversity, human creativity, and technological innovation. Growth and Change, 32(3), 369-394.
33. DeVol, R.C. (1999). America’s high-tech economy: growth, development, and risk for metropolitan areas. Santa Monica, CA: Miliken Institute.
34. Döring, T. and Schnellenbach, J. (2006). What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: a survey of the literature. Regional Studies, 40, 375-395.
35. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovations approaches-their emergence and characteristics. In Edquist, C. (ed.) Systems of innovations: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Cassell.
36. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
37. Feldman, M.P. (1994). The university and economic development: the case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly, 8(1), 67-76.
38. Feldman, M.P. and Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210-229.
39. Feller, I. (1990). Universities as engines of RandD-based economic growth: they think they can. Research Policy, 19(4), 335-348.
40. Florida, R. (1995). Towards the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527-536.
41. Freeman, C. (1991). The nature of innovation and evolution of the product system. In Technology and productivity: the challenge for economic policy. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
42. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. Goldstein, H.A., Maier, G. and Luger, M. (1995). The university as an instrument for economic and business development: U.S. and European comparisons. In Dill, D. and Sporn, B. (eds) Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: through a glass darkly. Issues in higher education. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science Inc.
44. Goldstein, H.A. and Renault, C. (2004). Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasiexperimental approach. Regional Studies, 38(7), 733-746.
45. Gottlieb, P. (2001). The problem of brain drain in Ohio and northeastern Ohio: what is it? how severe is it? what should we do about it? Center for Regional Economic Issues, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
46. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
47. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of RandD to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
48. Gulbrandsen, M. (1997). Universities and industrial competitive advantage. In Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (eds) Universities in the global economy: a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (121-131). London: Cassell.
49. Harrison, B., Kelley, M. and Gant, J.P. (1996). Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the interaction of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change. Economic Geography, 72(3), 233-258.
50. Hassink, R. (2001) Towards regionally embedded innovation support system in South Korea: Case-studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi. Urban Studies, 38, 1373-1395.
51. Hill, E. and Lendel, I. (2007). The impact of the reputation of bio-life science and engineering doctoral programs on regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 21(3), 223-243.
52. Hudson, R. (1999). “The learning economy, the learning firm and the learning region”: a sympathetic critique of the limits to learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 59-72.
53. Huggins, R. (1999). Embedding inward investment through workforce development: experience in Wales. Papers in Planning Research. Cardiff: Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales.
54. Iammarino, S. and McCann, P. (2006). The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35(7), 1018-1036.
55. Innis, H.A. (1950). Empire and communications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Innis, H.A. (1951). The bias of communications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
57. Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity, spillovers of RandD: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
58. Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 957-970.
59. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577-598.
60. Keane, J. and Allison, J. (1999). The intersection of the learning region and local and regional economic development: analyzing the role of higher education. Regional Studies, 33(9), 896-902.
61. Kelly, M. and Hageman, A. (1999). Marshallian externalities in innovation. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 39-54.
62. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
63. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.
64. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Krugman, P. (1995). Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Krugman, P. (1998). What’s new about economic geography. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 7-17.
67. Krugman, P. (1999). The role of geography in development. International Regional Science Review, 22, 142-161.
68. Lester, R. (2005). Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies: summary report from the local innovation project. MIT: Industrial Performance Center. (MIT-IPC-05-010)
69. Leydesdorff, L. and Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203.
70. Link, A.L. and Rees, J. (1990). Firm size, university based research, and the return to RandD. Small Business Economics, 2, 25-31.
71. Lowen, R. (1997). Creating the Cold War university: the transformation of Stanford. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
72. Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
73. Lundvall, B. (1992). Introduction. In Lundvall, B. (ed.) National systems of innovations: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
74. Lundvall, B. and Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23-42.
75. Malecki, E.J. (1997). Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional and national competitiveness. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
76. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
77. Martin, R. (1999). Critical Survey. The new “geographical turn” in economics: some critical reflection. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 65-91.
78. Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (1996). Paul Krugman’s “Geographical Economics” and its implications for regional development theory: a critical assessment. Economic Geography, 72(3), 259-292.
79. Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalsson, I., Malmberg, A. and Vatne, E. (1998). Competitiveness, localised learning and regional development: specialisation and prosperity in small open economies. London: Routledge.
80. Maurseth, P.B. and Verspagen, B. (1999). Knowledge spillovers in Europe. A patent citation analysis. Paper presented at the CRENOS Conference on Technological Externalities and Spatial Location, University of Cagliari, 24-25 September.
81. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 36(5), 491-503.
82. Morgan, B. (2002). Higher education and regional economic department in Wales: An opportunity for demonstrating the efficacy of devolution in economic development. Regional Studies, 36(1), 65-73.
83. Nelson, R. (1986). Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 186-189.
84. North, D.C. (1955). Location theory and regional economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 63(3), 243-258.
85. Oinas, P. and Malecki, E. (1999). Making connections: technological learning and regional economic change. Aldershot: Ashgate.
86. Oinas, P. and Malecki, E. (2002). The evolution of technologies in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems. International Regional Science Review, 25(1), 102-131.
87. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
88. Paytas, J., Gradeck, R. and Andrews, L. (2004). Universities and the development of industry clusters. Pittsburgh, PA: Center for Economic Development, Carnegie Mellon University.
89. Phelps, N. (1997). Multinationals and European integration: trade, investment and regional development. London: Jessica Kingsley.
90. Pires, A.R. and Castro, E.A. (1997). Can a strategic project for a university be strategic to regional development? Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 15-20.
91. Polanyi, M. (1962). Tacit knowledge: Its bearing on some problems of philosophy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 34, 601-616.
92. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
93. Porter, M. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
94. Porter, M. (2002). Leveraging colleges and universities for urban economic revitalization: an action agenda, initiative for a competitive inner city and CEOs for cities. Retrieved September 4, 2005 from http://www.cherrycommission.org/docs/Resources/Economic_Benefits/EDA_University_based_partnerships2004.pdf
95. Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R.Y. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
96. Rogers, E.M., Yin, J. and Hoffmann, J. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, XII, 47-80.
97. Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
98. Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 72-102.
99. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The fundamental phenomenon of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
101. Smith, Adam. (1776). Wealth of Nations, C.J. Bullock (ed.). Vol. X. The Harvard Classics. New York: P.F. Collier and Son, 1909-14; Bartleby.com, 2001. www.bartleby.com/10/.
102. Solow, R.S. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320.
103. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
104. Tornatzky, L.G., Waugaman, P.G. and Bauman, J.S. (1997). Benchmarking university-industry technology transfer in the South: 1995-1996 data. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
105. Tornatzky, L.G., Waugaman, P.G. and Casson, L. (1995). Benchmarking university-industry technology transfer in the South: 1993-1994 data. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
106. Tornatzky, L.G., Waugaman, P.G. and Gray, D. (1999). Industry-university technology transfer: models of alternative practice, policy, and program. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
107. Tornatzky, L.G., Waugaman, P.G. and Gray, D. (2002). Innovation U.: new university roles in a knowledge economy. Raleigh, Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
108. Varga, A. (1997). Regional economic effects of university research: a survey. Research Paper, 9729. Retrieved March 5, 2002, from West Virginia University, Regional Research Institute.
109. Verspagen, B. and Schoenmakers, W. (2000). The spatial dimension of knowledge spillovers in Europe: evidence from patenting data. Paper presented at the AEA Conference on Intellectual Property Econometrics, Alicante, 19-20 April.
110. Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the location of industries. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
111. Young, A.A. (1999). Money and growth: selected papers of Allyn Abbott Young. London: Routledge.