The impact of the reputation of bio-life science and engineering doctoral programs on regional economic development

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 223-243

  Hill, Edward W ^a   Lendel, Iryna ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic development; Evaluation; Impact of universities; Regional economics; Science and technology policy

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS CYCLE; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMPLOYMENT; GROWTH RATE; INCOME; METROPOLITAN AREA; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38749147728     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: 15523543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891242407301862     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams, J.D. (2001). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers (NBER Working Paper Series 8292). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2. Adams, J.D. (2002). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 2 (3), 253-278.
3. Adams, J.D. (2004). Learning, internal research, and spillovers: Evidence from a sample of R&D laboratories (Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0409). Retrieved February 24, 2007, from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rpirpiwpe/0409.htm
4. Agrawal, A., & Cockburn, I. (2002). University research, industrial R&D and the anchor tenant hypothesis (NBER Working Paper 9212). Retrieved February 24, 2007, from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9212
5. Bartik, T. (1990). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: The W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
6. Berglund, D., & Clarke, M. (2000). Using research and development to grow state economies. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
7. Berglund, D., & Clarke, M. (2006). A resource guide for technology-based economic development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.eda.gov/ImageCache/EDAPublic/documents/pdfdocs2006/ resourceguide06_2epdf/v1/resourceguide06.pdf
8. Birch, D., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. In L. C. Solomon & A. R. Levenson (Eds.), Labor markets, employment policy, and job creation (pp. 158-168). Boulder, CO: Westview.
9. Case, J. (2001, May 15). The Gazelle theory. Inc. Magazine. Retrieved February 24, 2007, from http://www.inc.com/magazine/20010515/22613.html
10. Cortright, J. (2001). New growth theory, technology and learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.eda.gov/ ImageCache/EDAPublic/documents/pdfdocs/1g3lr_5f7_5fcortright_2epdf/v1/ 1g3lr_5f7_5fcortright.pdf
11. Feldman, M.P. (1994). The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly, 8 (1), 67-76.
12. Frey, W.H., Wilson, J.H., Berube, A., & Singer, A. (2004, November). Tracking metropolitan America into the 21st century. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program, Living Cities Census Series. Retrieved February 24, 2007, from http://www.brookings.edu/metro/ pubs/20041115_metrodefinitions.htm
13. Gittell, R., & Sedgley, N. (2000). High technology and state higher education policy: Myths and realities. American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (7), 1092-1120.
14. Glaeser, E.L. (1998). Are cities dying? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (2), 139-160.
15. Hill, E.W., & Lendel, I. (2005). Did 9/11 change Manhattan and the New York region as places to conduct business ? In H. Chernick (Ed.), Resilient city: The economic impact of 9/11. New York: Russell Sage.
16. Jones, C.I. (2002). Introduction to economic growth (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
17. Magner, D.K. (1995, September 22). Long-awaited survey ranks 3,634 doctoral programs nationwide. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A21-22. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/che-data/ articles.dir/art-42.dir/issue-04.dir/04a02001.htm
18. National Research Council. (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (1), 15-34.
20. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 72-102.
21. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Tallman, E., & Wang, P. (1992, September/October). Human capital investments and economic growth: New routes in theory address old questions. Economic Review, pp. 1-11.
23. Varga, A. (1998). University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. New York: Springer.
24. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
25. Warsh, D. (2006). Knowledge and the wealth of nations. New York: Norton.