Insensitive blueberries: A total-evidence analysis of Disterigma s.l. (Ericaceae) exploring transformation costs

Cladistics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 388-407

  Pedraza Peñalosa, Paola ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; MOLECULAR ECOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; NEOTROPICAL REGION; PARAMETERIZATION; PHYLOGENY;

DISTERIGMA; DISTERIGMA RIMBACHII; DISTERIGMA TRIMERUM; ERICACEAE; VACCINIUM;

EID: 77954489437     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00293.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aagesen L, Medan D, Kellermann J, Hilger HH. Phylogeny of the tribe Colletieae (Rhamnaceae), a sensitivity analysis of the plastid region trnL-trnF combined with morphology. Plant. Syst. Evol. 2005a, 250:197-214.
2. Aagesen L, Petersen G, Seberg O. Sequence length variation, indel costs, and congruence in sensitivity analysis. Cladistics 2005b, 21(1):15-30.
3. Donoghue MJ, Sanderson MJ. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Molecular Systematics of Plants 1992, 340-368. Solits PS, Soltis DEDoyle JJ. In, Eds, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp
4. Dowton M, Austin AD. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy-The behavior of the Incongruence Length Difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51(1):19-31.
5. Farris JS. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Advances in Cladistics 2 1983, 1-36. Platnick NIFunk VA. In, Eds, Columbia University Press, New York, pp
6. Farris JS. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Syst. Zool. 1989, 38:406-407.
7. Giribet G. Exploring the behavior of POY, a program for direct optimization of molecular data. Cladistics 2001, 17(1):S60-S70.
8. Giribet G. Stability in phylogenetic formulations and its relationships to nodal support. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52(4):554-564.
9. Goloboff P, Farris JS, Nixon KC. T.N.T.: tree analysis using new technology ver. 1.0 (September 2005). 2000, http://www.cladistics.org/tnt.html, Available at:
10. Grant T, Kluge AG. Stability, sensitivity, science and heurism. Cladistics 2005, 21(6):597-604.
11. Kluge AG. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 1989, 38:7-25.
12. Kron KA, Judd WS, Stevens PF, Crayn DM, Anderberg AA, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Luteyn JL. Phylogenetic classification of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Bot. Rev. 2002a, 68(3):335-423.
13. Kron KA, Powell EA, Luteyn JL. Phylogenetic relationships within the blueberry tribe (Vaccinieae, Ericaceae) based on sequence data from matK and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions, with comments on the placement of Satyria. Am. J. Bot. 2002b, 89(2):327-336.
14. Manual of leaf architecture -morphological description and categorization of dicotyledonous and net-veined monocotyledonous angiosperms 1999, Leaf Architecture Working Group, Leaf Architecture Working Group, Washington, DC
15. Lewis PO. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 2001, 50:913-925.
16. Luteyn JL. A revision of the Mexican-Central American species of Cavendishia (Vacciniaceae). Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 1976, 28(3):1-138.
17. Luteyn JL. Ericaceae-Part I. Cavendishia. Fl. Neotrop. 1983, 35:1-290.
18. Luteyn JL. Ericaceae. Flora of Ecuador 1996, 54:1-404.
19. Luteyn JL. Diversity, adaptation, and endemism in neotropical Ericaceae: Biogeographical patterns in the Vaccinieae. Bot. Rev. 2002, 68(1):55-87.
20. Luteyn JL. Four new species of Ericaceae (Vaccinieae) from Ecuador. SIDA 2005, 21(3):1269-1282.
21. Luteyn JL, Pedraza-Peñalosa P. Neotropical Blueberries. 2006, http://www.nybg.org/bsci/res/lut2, Available at: [continuously updated]
22. Mast RB, Rodríguez-Maecha JV, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG. Tropical Andes. Hotspots: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions 1999, 68-85. Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Mittermeier CG. In, Eds, CEMEX, Mexico, pp
23. Mickevich MF, Farris JS. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 1981, 30:351-370.
24. Nixon KC. WinClada ver. 1.00.08 2002, Published by the author, Ithaca, NY
25. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 1996, 12:221-241.
26. Ogden TH, Whiting MF. The problem with "the Paleoptera problem": sense and sensitivity. Cladistics 2003, 19:432-442.
27. Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M, Eigenbrod F, Pickup N, Olson VA, Webster AJ, Ding T, Rasmussen PC, Ridgely RS, Stattersfield A, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Owens IPF. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 2005, 436:1016-1019.
28. Pedraza-Peñalosa P. Systematics and phylogeny of the Andean blueberry Disterigma (Ericaceae: Vaccinieae). 2008a, PhD Dissertation, New York, NY: The City University of New York
29. Pedraza-Peñalosa P. Three new species of Disterigma (Ericaceae: Vaccinieae) from western Colombia, with comments on morphological terminology. Brittonia 2008b, 60(1):1-10.
30. Pedraza-Peñalosa P. Systematics of the neotropical blueberry genus Disterigma (Ericaceae). Syst. Bot. 2009, 34(2):406-413.
31. Powell EA, Kron KA. Molecular systematics of the northern Andean blueberries (Vaccinieae, Vaccinioideae, Ericaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164(6):987-995.
32. Sleumer HO. Ericaceae americanae novae vel minus cognitae, II. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 1935, 12:277-294.
33. Sleumer HO. Vaccinioideen-Studien. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1941, 71:375-510.
34. Smith AC. The American Species of Thibaudieae. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 1932, 28:311-547.
35. Smith AC. The genera Sphyrospermum and Disterigma. Brittonia 1933, 1(4):203-232.
36. Smith AC. Vacciniaceae. Phytologia 1935, 1(3).
37. Smith AC. Studies of South American plants, V. Additional notes on Thibaudieae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1936, 63:307-316.
38. Stevens PF. Classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 1971, 64:1-53.
39. Terry MD, Whiting MF. Comparison of two alignment techniques within a single complex data set: POY versus Clustal. Cladistics 2005, 21:272-281.
40. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22(22):4673-4680.
41. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25(24):4876-4882.
42. Varón A, Vinh LS, Wheeler WC. POY version 4: phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies. Cladistics 2009, 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00282.x, doi
43. Wheeler WC. The triangle inequality and character analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10(3):707-712.
44. Wheeler WC. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 1995, 44(3):321-331.
45. Wheeler WC, Hayashi CY. The phylogeny of the extant chelicerate orders. Cladistics 1998, 14:173-192.
46. Wheeler WC, Aagesen L, Arango CP, Faivovich J, Grant T, D'Haese C, Janiers D, Smith L, Varón A, Giribet G. Dynamic Homology and Phylogenetic Systematics: a Unified Approach Using POY 2006, American Museum of Natural History, New York