The performance of a hydrogel nucleus pulposus prosthesis in an ex vivo canine model

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 26, 2010, Pages 6782-6788

  Bergknut, Niklas ^a,b   Smolders, Lucas A ^a   Koole, Leo H ^c   Voorhout, George ^d   Hagman, Ragnvi E ^b   Lagerstedt, Anne Sofie ^b   Saralidze, Ketie ^c   Hazewinkel, Herman A W ^a   van der Veen, Albert J ^e   Meij, Björn P ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hydrogel; Intervertebral disc; Radiopacity; Spinal surgery

Indexed keywords

BEFORE AND AFTER; CANINE MODELS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ETHYL METHACRYLATES; EX-VIVO; IN-SITU; INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS; LOW BACK; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; PYRROLIDINONE; RADIOPACITY; SPINAL SEGMENTS; SPINAL SURGERY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HYDROGELS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTHETICS; RADIOGRAPHY; RESONANCE; RESTORATION; SURGERY;

RADIOLOGY;

1 VINYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; 2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; BIOMATERIAL; HYDROGEL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSECTION; DOG; ENDOPROSTHESIS; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HYDROGEL; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; DRUG EFFECTS; PATHOLOGY; PHARMACOLOGY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY;

ANIMALS; DOGS; HYDROGEL; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC;

EID: 77954387566     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.032     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Frymoyer J.W., Cats-Baril W.L. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 1991, 22(2):263-271.
2. Maniadakis N., Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000, 84(1):95-103.
3. Freburger J.K., Holmes G.M., Agans R.P., Jackman A.M., Darter J.D., Wallace A.S., et al. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169(3):251-258.
4. Cheung K.M., Karppinen J., Chan D., Ho D.W., Song Y.Q., Sham P., et al. Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals. Spine 2009, 34(9):934-940.
5. Adams M.A. Biomechanics of back pain. Acupunct Med 2004, 22(4):178-188.
6. Min J.H., Jang J.S., Jung B.J., Lee H.Y., Choi W.C., Shim C.S., et al. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008, 21(5):305-309.
7. Yang J.Y., Lee J.K., Song H.S. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 2008, 33(5):503-507.
8. van Ooij A., Schurink G.W., Oner F.C., Verbout A.J. [Findings in 67 patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms after implantation of a disc prosthesis for low back pain]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2007, 151(28):1577-1584.
9. Resnick D.K., Watters W.C. Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review. Clin Neurosurg 2007, 54:83-87.
10. Hiyama A., Mochida J., Iwashina T., Omi H., Watanabe T., Serigano K., et al. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in a canine disc degeneration model. J Orthop Res 2008, 26(5):589-600.
11. Ganey T., Libera J., Moos V., Alasevic O., Fritsch K.G., Meisel H.J., et al. Disc chondrocyte transplantation in a canine model: a treatment for degenerated or damaged intervertebral disc. Spine 2003, 28(23):2609-2620.
12. Masuda K., Imai Y., Okuma M., Muehleman C., Nakagawa K., Akeda K., et al. Osteogenic protein-1 injection into a degenerated disc induces the restoration of disc height and structural changes in the rabbit anular puncture model. Spine 2006, 31(7):742-754.
13. Raj P.P. Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Pract 2008, 8(1):18-44.
14. Felder-Puig R., Gyimesi M., Mittermayr T., Geiger-Gritsch S. [Chemonucleolysis and intradiscal electrothermal therapy: what is the current evidence?]. Rofo 2009, 181(10):936-944.
15. Putzier M., Schneider S.V., Funk J.F., Tohtz S.W., Perka C. The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine 2005, 30(5):E109-E114.
16. Coric D., Mummaneni P.V. Nucleus replacement technologies. J Neurosurg Spine 2008, 8(2):115-120.
17. Shim C.S., Lee S.H., Park C.W., Choi W.C., Choi G., Choi W.G., et al. Partial disc replacement with the PDN prosthetic disc nucleus device: early clinical results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16(4):324-330.
18. Boelen E.J.H., van Hooy-Corstjens C.S.J., Gijbels M.J.J., Bulstra S.K., van Ooij A., van Rhijn L.W., et al. Preliminary evaluation of new intrinsically radiopaque hydrogels for replacing the nucleus pulposus. J Mater Chem 2006, 16(9):824-828.
19. Guyer R.D., Ohnmeiss D.D. Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine 2003, 28(15 Suppl.):S15-S23.
20. Meakin J.R. Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk: prediction of suitable properties of a replacement material using finite element analysis. J Mater Sci 2001, 12(3):207-213.
21. Meakin J.R., Reid J.E., Hukins D.W. Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc. Clin Biomech 2001, 16(7):560-565.
22. Di Martino A., Vaccaro A.R., Lee J.Y., Denaro V., Lim M.R. Nucleus pulposus replacement: basic science and indications for clinical use. Spine 2005, 30(16 Suppl.):S16-S22.
23. Berlemann U., Schwarzenbach O. An injectable nucleus replacement as an adjunct to microdiscectomy: 2 year follow-up in a pilot clinical study. Eur Spine J 2009, 18(11):1706-1712.
24. Jin D., Qu D., Zhao L., Chen J., Jiang J. Prosthetic disc nucleus (PDN) replacement for lumbar disc herniation: preliminary report with six months' follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16(4):331-337.
25. Boelen E.J., Koole L.H., van Rhijn L.W., van Hooy-Corstjens C.S. Towards a functional radiopaque hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 2007, 83(2):440-450.
26. Yang C.W., Liu L., Wang J., Dong A.S., Lu J.P., He S.S., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts. Chin Med J 2009, 122(8):911-916.
27. Rupp R., Ebraheim N.A., Savolaine E.R., Jackson W.T. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. General safety and superior imaging with titanium. Spine 1993, 18(3):379-385.
28. Smolders L.A., Bergknut N., Veen AJvd, Kingma I., Koole L.H., Gustås P., et al. Biomechanical testing of a lumbosacral nucleus pulposus prosthesis: a canine cadaver study. European veterinary conference; 2009 2009, 24. Amsterdam, NL. A.-M. Verbruggen, A. Werners (Eds.).