Evaluation of demineralized bone and bone transplants in vitro and in vivo with cone beam computed tomography imaging

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 264-269

  Draenert, F G ^a   Gebhart, F ^b   Berthold, M ^a   Gosau, M ^c   Wagner, W ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone augmentation; Cone beam computed tomography; Implantology

Indexed keywords

CHELATING AGENT; EDETIC ACID;

AGED; ANATOMY; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE; BONE REMODELING; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; JAW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWINE;

AGED; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE DEMINERALIZATION TECHNIQUE; BONE REMODELING; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CHELATING AGENTS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRYOPRESERVATION; EDETIC ACID; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SWINE;

EID: 77954318331     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/147454468     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the conebeam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558-1564.
2. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Grondahl K, Haris D, Jacobs R, et al. E. A. O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:566-570.
3. Draenert FG, Gebhart F, Neugebauer C, Coppenrath E, Mueller-Lisse U. Imaging of bone transplants in the maxillofacial area by NewTom 9000 cone-beam computed tomography: a quality assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106: e31-e35.
4. Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess C, Bartling SH, Schmidt B, Stierstorfer K, et al. Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1191-1205.
5. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007;17:2767-2779.
6. Mahnken AH, Grasruck M, Schmidt B, Gunther RW, Wildberger JE. Flat panel computed tomography for noninvasive flow measurement: initial results in in-vitro studies. Eur Radiol 2008;18:747-752.
7. Heiland M, Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Habermann CR, Oesterhelweg L, Begemann PC, et al. Cervical soft tissue imaging using a mobile CBCT scanner with a flat panel detector in comparison with corresponding CT and MRI data sets. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:814-820.
8. Draenert GF, Gebhart F, Al Nawas B, Wagner W. Demineralized bone and bone transplants in vivo/vitro in CBCTs (#1980). IADR/AADR/CADR 87th General Session and Exhibition (1-4 April 2009). Miami, USA; 2009..
9. Miami, USA; 2009.
10. Belanger LF, Copp DH, Morton MA. Demineralization with EDTA by constant replacement. Anat Rec 1965;153:41-47.
11. Jalbert F, Paoli JR. Osirix: free and open-source software for medical imagery. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2008;109:53-55.
12. Prokop M. New challenges in MDCT. Eur Radiol 2005;15: E35-E45.
13. Mori S, Endo M, Obata T, Tsunoo T, Susumu K, Tanada S. Properties of the prototype 256-row (cone beam) CT scanner. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2100-2108.
14. Kyriakou Y, Kalender WA. X-ray scatter data for flat-panel detector CT. Phys Med 2007;23:3-15.
15. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:446-454.
16. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, et al. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:512-518.
17. Schulze D, Heiland M, Blake F, Rother U, Schmelzle R. Evaluation of quality of reformatted images from two conebeam computed tomographic systems. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005;33:19-23.
18. Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:225-234.
19. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:290-297.
20. Stoppie N, Pattijn V, Van Cleynenbreugel T, Wevers M, Vander Sloten J, Ignace N. Structural and radiological parameters for the characterization of jawbone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:124-133.