Research on a modified framework of implicit personality theories

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 318-326

  Ziegler, Albert ^a   Stoeger, Heidrun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gifted; Implicit personality theories; Intelligence

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954315149     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baumeister R.F. Identity: Cultural change and the struggle for self 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Breitkopf L. Zur Validität und Nützlichkeit der Hilflosigkeitsskala HiS in klinischpsychologischen und medizinpsychologischen Untersuchungen [The validity and usefulness of the Helplessness Scale in clinical and medical investigations in the field of Psychology]. Diagnostica 1985, 31:324-332.
3. Brettingham M. I knew I was clever, but even I was astounded by how clever I was. The Times Educational Supplement 2007, February 29, 22.
4. Brown J.D. Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. Psychological perspectives on the self 1993, Vol. 4:27-58. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Chen S., Chen K.Y., Shaw L. Self-verification motives at the collective level of self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:77-94.
6. Colangelo N., Assouline S. Self-concept of gifted students: Patterns by self-concept domain, grade level, and gender. Nurturing talent; individual needs and social ability 1995, Van Gorcum, Assen, NL. M.W. Katzko, F.J. Mönks (Eds.).
7. Cole P.G., Cilia J. Effects of gifted labels and competency factors on regular class students' estimates of the academic and social competence of a male student. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 1990, 37(3):235-244.
8. Cross T., Coleman L., Stewart R. The social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review 1993, 16(1):37-40.
9. Dweck C.S. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development 1999, Psychology Press, Philadelphia.
10. Dweck C.S. Mindset: The new psychology of success 2006, Random House, New York.
11. Dweck C.S., Chiu C., Hong Y. Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry 1995, 6:322-333.
12. Dweck, C. S., & Henderson, V. L. (1988). Theories of intelligence: Background and measures. Champaign-Urbana: Unpublished manuscript.
13. Dweck C.S., Leggett E.L. A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 1988, 95:256-273.
14. Erikson E. Identity and the life cycle. Psychological issues 1959, 1-171. International Universities Press, New York. G.S. Klein (Ed.).
15. Freeman, J. (1991). Gifted Children Growing Up. London: Cassell; Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann Educational.
16. Freeman J. Emotional problems of the gifted child. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2006, 24(3):481-485.
17. Freeman J. Giftedness in the long term. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2006, 29:384-403.
18. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. The presentation of self in everyday life 1959, 17-25. The Overlook Press, New York. E. Goffman (Ed.).
19. Harter S. Causes and consequences of low self-esteem. Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard 1993, 87-116. Plenum Press, New York. R.F. Baumeister (Ed.).
20. Heller K.A. Hochbegabung im Kindes- und Jugendalter [Giftedness in childhood and adolescence] 2000, Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen, Germany.
21. Heller K.A. Identification of gifted and talented students. Psychology Science 2004, 46(3):302-323.
22. Heller K.A., Finsterwald M., Ziegler A. Implicit theories of German mathematics and physics teachers on gender specific giftedness and motivation. Psychologische Beiträge 2001, 43:172-189.
23. Heller K.A., Perleth C. KFT 4-12+R Kognitiver Faehigkeits-Test fuer 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision. [Cognitive Ability Test for grades 4 to 12, Revised]. Cognitive Ability Test for grades 4 to 12, Revised] 2000, Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen, Germany.
24. Heller K.A., Reimann R., Senfter A. Hochbegabung im Grundschulalter: Erkennen und Fördern [High ability in the elementary school years: Identification and encouragement] 2005, LIT, Münster.
25. Hershey M., Oliver E. The effects of the label 'gifted' on students identified for special programs. Roeper Review 1988, 11(1):33-34.
26. Hong Y.Y., Chiu C.Y., Yeung G., Tong Y.Y. Social comparison during the political transition: Interaction of entity versus incremental beliefs and social identities. Journal of Intercultural Relations 1999, 23:257-279.
27. Kaplan L., Geoffrey K. Copout or burnout? Counseling strategies to reduce stress in gifted students. School Counselor 1993, 40:247-252.
28. Kolesaric V., Koren I. The effect of identification and differential treatment of gifted elementary school pupils. European Journal for High Ability 1992, 3:155-163.
29. Leary M.R. The social and psychological importance of self-esteem. The social psychology of emotional and behavioural problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology 1998, 197-221. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. R.M. Kowalski, M.R. Leary (Eds.).
30. Marcia J.E. Identity in adolescence. Handbook of adolescent psychology 1980, 159-187. John Wiley, Toronto. J. Adelson (Ed.).
31. Models of counseling gifted children, adolescents, and young adults 2007, 253-283. Prufrock, Austin, TX. S. Mendaglio, J.S. Peterson (Eds.).
32. Mueller C.M., Dweck C.S. Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:33-52.
33. Robinson A. Does that describe me? Adolescents' acceptance of the gifted label. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 1990, 13(3):245-255.
34. Roeper A. Reflections from Annemarie. Roeper Review 1996, 18(3):224-225.
35. Rogers C.R. On personal power. Inner strength and its revolutionary impact 1977, Delacorte, New York.
36. Rogers C.R. A way of being 1980, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
37. Rost D. Highly gifted and achieving adolescents. New findings from the Marburg Gifted Project 2000, Hogrefe, Münster, Germany.
38. Schlenker B.R. Self-presentation. Handbook of self and identity 2003, 492-518. The Guilford Press, New York. M. Leary, J. Tangney (Eds.).
39. Shahal, N. (1995). Nurturing gifted children. Paper presented at the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children meeting in Hong Kong.
40. Shore B., Cornell D., Robinson A., Ward V. Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis 1991, Teacher College Press, New York.
41. Sternberg R.J. The sounds of silence: A Nation responds to its gifted. Roeper Review 1996, 18(3):168-172.
42. Swann W.B., Chang-Schneider C., McClarty K. Yes, cavalier attitudes can have pernicious consequences: A reply to Krueger, Vohs, & Baumeister. American Psychologist 2008, 63:65-66.
43. Swann W.B., Rentfrow P.J., Guinn J.S. Self-verification: The search for coherence. Handbook of self and identity 2003, 367-383. Guilford Press, New York. M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney (Eds.).
44. Thorndike R.L., Hagen E.P. Cognitive Abilities Test 1971, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
45. Wicklund R.A., Gollwitzer P.M. Symbolic self-completion 1982, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
46. Wingert, H. (1997). The label gifted: Parent beliefs, transmission of beliefs and impact on the child. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/bitstream/1892/8496/1/b18457939.pdf.
47. Wright P., Leroux J. The self-concept of gifted adolescents in a congregated program. Gifted Child Quarterly 1997, 41(3):83-94.
48. Implicit theories as antecedents of motivation and behavior 2001, Pabst, Lengerich, Germany. A. Ziegler (Ed.).
49. Ziegler A. Hochbegabung [Giftedness] 2008, UTB, München.
50. Ziegler A., Dresel M., Schober B., Stoeger H. (UMTB): Documentation of items and scales [Ulm Educational Psychological Research Report, No. 15] 2005, Ulm University, Department of Educational Psychology, Ulm, Germany.
51. Ziegler A., Dresel M., Stoeger H. Addressees of performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100:643-654.
52. Ziegler A., Stoeger H. Motivationale Ziele im Mathematikunterricht von MittelstufenschülerInnen am Gymnasium. [Motivational orientation of high school students in mathematics]. Empirische Pädagogik 2002, 16:57-78.
53. Ziegler A., Stoeger H. Effect of role models from films on short-term ratings of intent, interest, and self-assessment of ability by high school youth: A study of gender-stereotyped academic subjects. Psychological Reports 2008, 102:509-531.