Introducing telemonitoring for diabetic patients: Development of a telemonitoring 'Health Effect and Readiness' Questionnaire

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 79, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 576-584

  Buysse, Heidi E C ^a   Coorevits, Pascal ^a   Van Maele, Georges ^a   Hutse, Annemie ^b   Kaufman, Jean ^b   Ruige, Johannes ^b   De Moor, Georges J E ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attitude; Diabetes mellitus; Questionnaires; Telemedicine; Utilisation; Validation

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED TRIAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; HEALTH EFFECTS; IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; TELE-MONITORING; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; TYPE-2 DIABETES;

NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; TELEMEDICINE;

HEALTH;

INSULIN; ORAL ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIABETIC PATIENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; TELEMONITORING; TELEMONITORING HEALTH EFFECT AND READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; ADOLESCENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; TELEMEDICINE; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954313438     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beaglehole R., Ebrahim S., Reddy S., Voute J., Leeder S. Prevention of chronic diseases: a call to action. Lancet 2007, 2152-2157.
2. World health organization, Ten statistical highlights in global public health. (last accessed 2006). http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat2006_10highlights.pdf.
3. Meijer W.J., Ragetlie P.L. Empowering the patient with ICT-tools: the unfulfilled promise. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2007, 199-218.
4. Meystre S. The current state of telemonitoring: a comment on the literature. Telemed. J. E Health 2005, 63-69.
5. Roig F., Saigi F. Difficulties of incorporating telemedicine in health organizations: analytical perspectives. Gac. Sanit. 2009, 147.
6. European Commission Health Care EU. (last accessed 16.10.09). http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp%3FcatId=754%26langId=en.
7. Chang J.Y., Chen L.K., Chang C.C. Perspectives and expectations for telemedicine opportunities from families of nursing home residents and caregivers in nursing homes. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 494-502.
8. Courtney K.L., Demiris G., Rantz M., Skubic M. Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Inform. Prim. Care 2008, 195-201.
9. Trief P.M., Sandberg J., Izquierdo R., Morin P.C., Shea S., Brittain R., Feldhousen E.B., Weinstock R.S. Diabetes management assisted by telemedicine: patient perspectives. Telemed. J. E Health 2008, 647-655.
10. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. (last accessed 12.12.08). http://www.eatlas.idf.org/.
11. Polisena J., Tran K., Cimon K., Hutton B., McGill S., Palmer K. Home telehealth for diabetes management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2009, 913-930.
12. Bradley C. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice 1994, Routledge, p. 424.
13. Mortelmans D., Dehertogh B. Factoranalyse 2008, Acco, Leuven, Belgium, p. 191.
14. Streiner D.L., Norman G.R. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use 2003, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
15. Shiu A.T.Y., Wong R.Y.M., Thompson D.R. Development of a reliable and valid Chinese version of the diabetes empowerment scale. Diabetes Care 2003, 2817-2821.
16. Bakken S., Grullon-Figueroa L., Izquierdo R., Lee N.J., Morin P., Palmas W., Teresi J., Weinstock R.S., Shea S., Starren J. Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006, 660-667.
17. Yip M.P., Chang A.M., Chan J., MacKenzie A.E. Development of the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: a preliminary study. J. Telemed. Telecare 2003, 46-50.
18. Demiris G., Speedie S., Finkelstein S. A questionnaire for the assessment of patients' impressions of the risks and benefits of home telecare. J. Telemed. Telecare 2000, 278-284.
19. American Telemedicine Association Home Telehealth Satisfaction Item Bank. (last accessed 15.04.08). http://media.americantelemed.org/ICOT/hometelehealthbank.htm.
20. Mazzi C.P., Kidd M. A framework for the evaluation of Internet-based diabetes management. J. Med. Internet Res. 2002, e1.
21. Hoffman-Goetz L., Donelle L., Thomson M.D. Clinical guidelines about diabetes and the accuracy of peer information in an unmoderated online health forum for retired persons. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2009, 91-99.
22. Seidman J., Steinwachs D., Rubin H. Design and testing of a tool for evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information web sites. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005, 1-17.
23. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistics notes: validating scales and indexes. BMJ 2002, 606-607.
24. Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 420-428.
25. William Collins Sons & Co.Ltd. Collins English Dictionary - Complete and Unabridged 6th ed. 2003 2003, HarperCollins Publishers, (1st ed. 1979).
26. van Dam H.A., van der Horst F.G., Knoops L., Ryckman R.M., Crebolder H.F.J.M., van den Borne B.H.W. Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Educ. Couns. 2005, 1-12.
27. De Rouck S., Jacobs A., Leys M. A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: a case in the homecare field. Int J. Med. Inform. 2008, 589-601.