A probabilistic characterization of the health benefits of reducing methyl mercury intake in the United States

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 5216-5224

  Rice, Glenn E ^a   Hammitt, James K ^b   Evans, John S ^a,c  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

^c CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; ECONOMIC BENEFITS; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES; EXPECTED MONETARY VALUES; EXPERT JUDGMENT; HEALTH BENEFITS; HEART ATTACK; METHYL MERCURY; MODEL PARAMETERS; POPULATION EXPOSURE; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY;

ECONOMICS; HEALTH; HEART; MERCURY (METAL); PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

HEALTH RISKS;

METHYLMERCURY;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CHILD HEALTH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH RISK; METHYLMERCURY; PROBABILITY;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; HEALTH; HEALTH HAZARD; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; POPULATION EXPOSURE; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; METHYLMERCURY COMPOUNDS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY; PUBLIC HEALTH;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954297272     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es903359u     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Carrington, C. D.; Bolger, M. P. An exposure assessment for methylmercury from seafood for consumers in the United States Risk Anal. 2002, 22, 689-699
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutritional Exam Survey (NHANES); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, 2008; http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/datalink.htm.
3. Kjellstrom, T.; Kennedy, P.; Wallis, S.; Stewart, A. Physical and Mental Development of Children With Prenatal Exposure to Mercury From Fish. Stage 2: Interviews and Psychological Tests at Age 6, Report 3642; National Swedish Environmental Protection Board: Sweden, 1989.
4. Grandjean, P.; Weihe, P.; White, R. F.; Debes, F.; Araki, S.; Yokoyama, K.; Murata, K.; Sorensen, N.; Dahl, R.; Jorgensen, P. J. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1997, 19, 417-428
5. Salonen, J. T.; Seppanen, K.; Nyyssonen, K.; Korpela, H.; Kauhanen, J.; Kantola, M.; Tuomilehto, J.; Esterbauer, H.; Tatzber, F.; Salonen, R. Intake of mercury from fish, lipid peroxidation, and the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary, cardiovascular, and any death in eastern Finnish men Circulation. 1995, 91, 645-655
6. Guallar, E.; Sanz-Gallardo, M. I.; van't, V. P.; Bode, P.; Aro, A.; Gomez-Aracena, J.; Kark, J. D.; Riemersma, R. A.; Martin-Moreno, J. M.; Kok, F. J. Mercury, fish oils, and the risk of myocardial infarction N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1747-1754
7. Gayer, T.; Hahn, R. W. Designing Environmental Policy: Lessons From the Regulation of Mercury Emissions. Regulatory Analysis 05-01; AEI Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies: Washington, DC, 2005; http://aei-brookings.org/ admin/authorpdfs/redirect-safely.php?fname=/pdffiles/phpz9.pdf.
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Air Mercury Rule; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation: Washington, DC, 2005; http://www.epa.gov/mercuryrule/rule.htm#oct05a.
9. Spadaro, J. V.; Rabl, A. Global health impacts and costs due to mercury emissions Risk Anal. 2008, 28, 603-613
10. Morgan, M. G.; Dowlatabadi, H.; Henrion, M.; Keith, D.; Lempert, R.; McBride, S.; Small, M.; Wilbanks, T. Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making. Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2; U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Washington, DC, 2008; http://www.climatescience.gov/ Library/sap/sap5-2/sap5-2-draft3.pdf.
11. Stern, A. H. A revised probabilistic estimate of the maternal methyl mercury intake dose corresponding to a measured cord blood mercury concentration Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 155-163
12. Shipp, A. M.; Gentry, P. R.; Lawrence, G.; Van, L. C.; Covington, T.; Clewell, H. J.; Gribben, K.; Crump, K. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations Toxicol. Ind. Health. 2000, 16, 335-438
13. Allen, B. C.; Hack, C. E.; Clewell, H. J. Use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis with a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of methylmercury to estimate exposures in US women of childbearing age Risk Anal. 2007, 27, 947-959
14. Myers, G. J.; Davidson, P. W.; Cox, C.; Shamlaye, C. F.; Palumbo, D.; Cernichiari, E.; Sloane-Reeves, J.; Wilding, G. E.; Kost, J.; Huang, L. S.; Clarkson, T. W. Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development study Lancet. 2003, 361, 1686-1692
15. Cohen, J. T.; Bellinger, D. C.; Shaywitz, B. A. A quantitative analysis of prenatal methyl mercury exposure and cognitive development Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 29, 353-365
16. Axelrad, D. A.; Bellinger, D. C.; Ryan, L. M.; Woodruff, T. J. Dose-response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: an integrative analysis of epidemiologic data Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 609-615
17. Budtz-Jorgensen, E.; Debes, F.; Weihe, P.; Grandjean, P. Adverse Mercury Effects in 7 Year Old Children Expressed As Loss in "IQ". Document ID EPA HQ OAR 2002 0056 6046, 2005 (accessed 1/4/08).
18. Budtz-Jorgensen, E.; Grandjean, P.; Weihe, P. Separation of risks and benefits of seafood intake Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 323-327
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Oral Reference Dose for Methyl Mercury; Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment: Washington, DC, 2001.
20. Hallgren, C. G.; Hallmans, G.; Jansson, J. H.; Marklund, S. L.; Huhtasaari, F.; Schutz, A.; Stromberg, U.; Vessby, B.; Skerfving, S. Markers of high fish intake are associated with decreased risk of a first myocardial infarction Br. J. Nutr. 2001, 86, 397-404
21. Yoshizawa, K.; Rimm, E. B.; Morris, J. S.; Spate, V. L.; Hsieh, C. C.; Spiegelman, D.; Stampfer, M. J.; Willett, W. C. Mercury and the risk of coronary heart disease in men N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1755-1760
22. Ahlqwist, M.; Bengtsson, C.; Lapidus, I. A.; Shutz, A. Serum mercury concentration in relation to survival, symptoms, and disease: Results from the prospective population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden Acta. Odontol. Scand. 1999, 57, 168-174
23. Greenland, S.; Robins, J. M. Epidemiology, justice, and the probability of causation Jurimetrics. 2000, 40, 321-340
24. Hill, A. B. The environment and disease: association or causation Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1965, 58, 295-300
25. Stern, A. H. A review of the studies of the cardiovascular health effects of methylmercury with consideration of their suitability for risk assessment Environ. Res. 2005, 98, 133-142
26. Salonen, J. T.; Seppanen, K.; Lakka, T. A.; Salonen, R.; Kaplan, G. A. Mercury accumulation and accelerated progression of carotid atherosclerosis: a population-based prospective 4-year follow-up study in men in eastern Finland Atherosclerosis. 2000, 148, 265-273
27. Lin, T. H.; Huang, Y. L.; Huang, S. F. Lipid peroxidation in liver of rats administrated with methyl mercuric chloride Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1996, 54, 33-41
28. Levy, J. I.; Carrothers, T. J.; Tuomisto, J. T.; Hammitt, J. K.; Evans, J. S. Assessing the public health benefits of reduced ozone concentrations Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 1215-1226
29. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2003 Update; American Heart Association: Dallas, TX, 2002.
30. Schwartz, J. Societal benefits of reducing lead exposure Environ. Res. 1994, 66, 105-124
31. Salkever, D. S. Updated estimates of earnings benefits from reduced exposure of children to environmental lead Environ. Res. 1995, 70, 1-6
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses, EPA/240/R-00/003; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation: Washington, DC, 2000.
33. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Circular A 4, Regulatory Analysis; U.S. Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2003; http://www. whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a004/a-4.pdf.
34. Heckman, J. J.; Stixrud, J.; Urzua, S. The effects of cognitive and non cognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior J. Labor Econ. 2006, 24, 411-482
35. Grosse, S. D. How much does IQ raise earnings? Implications for regulatory impact analyses Assoc. Environ. Res. Econ. Newlett. 2007, 27, 17-21
36. Hammitt, J. K. Valuing mortality risk: Theory and practice Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1396-1400
37. Robinson, L. A. How U.S. government agencies value mortality risk reductions Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy. 2007, 1, 283-299
38. Rosenberg, L.; Kaufman, D. W.; Helmrich, S. P.; Shapiro, S. The risk of myocardial infarction after quitting smoking in men under 55 years of age N. Engl. J. Med. 1985, 313, 1511-1514 (Pubitemid 16182480)
39. Willett, W. C.; Hennekens, C. H.; Bain, C.; Rosner, B.; Speizer, F. E. Cigarette smoking and non-fatal myocardial infarction in women Am. J. Epidemiol. 1981, 113, 575-582
40. Dobson, A. J.; Alexander, H. M.; Heller, R. F.; Lloyd, D. M. How soon after quitting smoking does risk of heart attack decline J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1991, 44, 1247-1253
41. Bakhru, A.; Erlinger, T. P. Smoking cessation and cardiovascular disease risk factors: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey PLoS. Med. 2005, 2, e160
42. von Stackelburg, K.; Hammitt, J. K. Use of contingent valuation to elicit willingness-to-pay for the benefits of developmental health risk reductions Environ. Res. Econ. 2009, 43, 45-61
43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Technical Appendix From Vital Statistics of the United States 2000. Natality; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Hyattsville, MD, 2002; http://205.207.175.93/VitalStats/ tableviewer/document.aspx?FileId=169 (accessed April 12, 2005).
44. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Data for the United States; U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC, 2004; http://www.census.gov/census2000/states/us.html.
45. Mrozek, J. R.; Taylor, L. O. What determines the value of life? A meta analysis J. Policy Anal. Manage. 2002, 21, 253-270
46. Viscusi, W. K.; Aldy, J. E. The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world J. Risk Uncertainty 2003, 27, 5-76
47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Report of the EPA Work Group on VSL Meta-Analyses, 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eermfile.nsf/vwAN/EE-0494- 01.pdf/$File/EE-0494-01.pdf.