Measuring the effectiveness of regional conservation assessments at representing biodiversity surrogates at a local scale: A case study in Réunion Island (Indian Ocean)

Austral Ecology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 121-133

  Payet, karine ^a,b   Rouget, Mathieu ^c   Lagabrielle, Erwann ^d,e   Esler, Karen J ^b  

^a SANBI   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^c SANBI   (South Africa)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LA RÉUNION   (France)

^e NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Coarse fine filters; Habitat transformation; Spatial scale; Surrogacy analysis; Systematic conservation planning; Thematic resolution

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; CORRELATION; FINANCIAL CRISIS; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HUMAN RESOURCE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SURROGATE METHOD; THEMATIC MAPPING;

MASCARENE ISLANDS; REUNION;

EID: 77954281011     PISSN: 14429985     EISSN: 14429993     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02014.x     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Archaux F, Gosselin F, Bergès L, Chevalier R. Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. J. Veg. Sci 2006, 17:299-306.
2. Bailey D, Billeter R, Aviron S, Schweiger O, Herzog F. The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 2007, 22:461-73.
3. Baldwin D J B, Weaver K, Schnekenburger F, Perera A H. Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for their use in natural disturbance emulation. Landscape Ecol 2004, 19:255-71.
4. Ball I R, Possingham H. MARXAN (V1.8.2): marine reserve design using spatially explicit annealing, a manual. 2000, http://www.ecology.uq.edu.au/marxan.htm, Cited 12 August 2006.] Available from URL:
5. Baret S, Rouget M, Richardson D M. Current distribution and potential extent of the most invasive alien plant species on La Réunion (Indian Ocean, Mascarene islands). Austral Ecol 2006, 31:750-61.
6. Index of vascular plants of Réunion Island: status, threats and protection levels. Version 2007.1. 2007, http://flore.cbnm.org, Conservatoire Botanique National de Mascarin (CBNM), Cited 24 November 2007.] Available from URL:
7. Brooks T M, Bakarr M I, Boucher T. Coverage provided by the global protected-area system: is it enough? BioScience 2004a, 54:1081-91.
8. Brooks T M, da Fonseca G A B, Rodrigues A S L. Protected areas and species. Conserv. Biol 2004b, 18:616-8.
9. Brooks T M, da Fonseca G A B, Rodrigues A S L. Species, data, and conservation planning. Conserv. Biol 2004c, 18:1682-8.
10. Cadet T. La végétation de l'île de La réunion, étude phytoécologique et phytosociologique. 1980, PhD Thesis). University of Aix Marseille, France
11. Castilla G, Larkin K, Linke J, Hay G J. The impact of thematic resolution on the patch-mosaic model of natural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 2009, 24:15-23.
12. Conroy M J, Noon B R. Mapping of species richness for conservation of biological diversity: conceptual and methodological issues. Ecol. Appl 1996, 6:763-73.
13. Cowling R M, Pressey R L. Rapid plant diversification: planning for an evolutionary future. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:5452-7.
14. Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Lombard A T, Heijnis C E, Richardson D M, Cole N. Framework for a conservation plan for the Cape Floristic Region. 1999, Report 9902). Institute of Plant Conservation, University of Cape Town
15. Cowling R M, Knight A T, Faith D P. Nature conservation requires more than a passion for species. Conserv. Biol 2004, 18:1674-6.
16. Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Rouget M, Lombard A T. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot-the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv 2003, 112:191-216.
17. Crane P. Measuring biodiversity for conservation: main report. 2003, http://royalsociety.org/document.asp?tip=0&id=1365, Policy Document 11/03. The Royal Society, London. [Cited 11 June 2009.] Available from URL:
18. Desmet P G, Cowling R M, Ellis A G, Pressey R L. Integrating biosystematic data into conservation planning: perspectives from southern Africa's succulent Karoo. Syst. Biol 2002, 51:317-30.
19. Driver A, Cowling R M, Maze K. Planning for living landscapes: perspectives and lessons from South Africa. 2003, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation International, Washington, DC, the Botanical Society of South Africa, Cape Town
20. ArcView GIS. 1992-2002, ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute), Inc., Version 3.2a). Redlands, CA
21. Erasmus B F N, Freitag S, Gaston K J, Erasmus B H, van Jaarsveld A S. Scale and conservation planning in the real world. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci 1999, 266:315-9.
22. Fairbanks D H K, Benn G A. Identifying regional landscapes for conservation planning: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Landscape Urban Plan. 2000, 50:237-57.
23. Ferrier S. Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Syst. Biol 2002, 51:331-63.
24. Ferrier S, Pressey R L, Barrett T W. A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biol. Conserv 2000, 93:303-25.
25. Ferrier S, Powell G V N, Richardson K S. Mapping more of terrestrial biodiversity for global conservation assessment. BioScience 2004, 54:1101-9.
26. Higgins J V, Ricketts T H, Parrish J D. Beyond Noah: saving species is not enough. Conserv. Biol 2004, 18:1672-73.
27. Hortal J, Lobo J M. Towards a synecological framework for systematic conservation planning. Biodivers. Informatics 2006, 3:16-45.
28. Hunter M L, Jacobson G L, Thompson W. Paleoecology and the coarse-filter approach to maintaining biological diversity. Conserv. Biol 1988, 2:375-85.
29. The physical science basis of climate change: technical summary, a contribution of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007, http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html, IPCC, Cited 12 November 2007.] Available from URL:
30. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. TM - a global species assessment: executive summary. 2004, http://www.iucnredlist.org/static/references, Baillie J E MTaylor C HStuart S N. IUCN, eds, Cited 12 June 2009.] Available from URL:
31. 2007 IUCN red list of threatened species. 2007, http://www.iucnredlist.org, IUCN, Cited 24 November 2007.] Available from URL:
32. Jacquemyn H, Micheneau C, Roberts D L, Pailler T. Elevational gradients of species diversity, breeding system and floral traits of orchid species on Réunion Island. J. Biogeogr 2005, 32:1751-61.
33. Justus J, Sarkar S. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. J. Biosci. (Bangalore) 2002, 27:421-35.
34. Kiester A R. Conservation prioritization using GAP data. Conserv. Biol 1996, 10:1332-42.
35. Knight A T, Driver A, Cowling R M. Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: Best practice from South Africa. Conserv. Biol 2006, 20:739-50.
36. Lagabrielle E. Biodiversity conservation planning and territory modelling in Réunion island. 2007, PhD Thesis). University of Réunion Island, France
37. Larsen F W, Rahbek C. The influence of spatial grain size on the suitability of the higher-taxon approach in continental priority-setting. Anim. Conserv 2005, 8:389-96.
38. Le Corre M, Safford R J. La Réunion and Iles Eparses 2001, Pisces Publications and BirdLife International, Newbury and Cambridge
39. Le Corre M, Ollivier A, Ribes S, Jouventin P. Light-induced mortality of petrels: a 4-year study from Réunion Island (Indian Ocean). Biol. Conserv 2002, 105:93-102.
40. Lombard A T, Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Mustart P J. Reserve selection in a species-rich and fragmented landscape on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa. Conserv. Biol 1997, 11:1101-16.
41. Lombard A T, Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Rebelo A G. Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region. Biol. Conserv 2003, 112:45-62.
42. Margules C R, Pressey R L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 2000, 405:243-53.
43. Margules C R, Pressey R L, Williams P H. Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority area for conservation. J. Biosci. (Bangalore) 2002, 27:309-26.
44. Mittermeier R A, Myers N, Thomsen J B. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol 1998, 12:516-20.
45. Molnar J, Marvier M, Kareiva P. The sum is greater than the parts. Conserv. Biol 2004, 18:1670-1.
46. Moritz C. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst. Biol 2002, 51:238-54.
47. Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, da Fonseca G A B, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-8.
48. Noss R F. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol 1990, 4:355-64.
49. Noss R F. Ecosystems as conservation targets. Tree 1996, 11:351.
50. Noss R F. Beyond Kyoto: forest management in a time of rapid climate change. Conserv. Biol 2001, 15:578-90.
51. Noss R F. Information needs for large-scale conservation planning. Conservation Science. 2002, Inc. Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network
52. Noss R F. A checklist for wildlands network designs. Conserv. Biol 2003, 17:1270-5.
53. Oliver I, Holmes A, Dangerfield J M. Land systems as surrogates for biodiversity in conservation planning. Ecol. Appl 2004, 14:485-503.
54. Pence G Q K, Botha M A, Turpie J K. Evaluating combinations of on-and off-reserve conservation strategies for the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: a financial perspective. Biol. Conserv 2003, 112:253-73.
55. Poiani K A, Richter B D, Anderson M G, Richter H E. Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: Functional sites, landscapes, and networks. BioScience 2000, 50:133-46.
56. Pressey R L. Conservation planning and biodiversity: assembling the best data for the job. Conserv. Biol 2004, 18:1677-81.
57. Pressey R L, Nicholls A O. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol. Conserv 1989, 50:199-218.
58. Pressey R L, Logan V S. Size of selection units for future reserves and its influence on actual vs. targeted representation of features: a case study in western New South Wales. Biol. Conserv 1998, 85:305-19.
59. Pressey R L, Taffs K H. Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss. Biol. Conserv 2001, 100:355-76.
60. Pressey R L, Humphries C J, Margules C R, Vane-Wright R I, Williams P H. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol 1993, 8:124-8.
61. Pressey R L, Johnson I R, Wilson P D. Shades of irreplaceability - towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodivers. Conserv 1994, 3:242-62.
62. Pressey R L, Possingham H P, Day J R. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol. Conserv 1997, 80:207-19.
63. Pressey R L, Cowling R M, Rouget M. Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv 2003, 112:99-127.
64. Probst J M, Le Corre M, Thebaud C. Breeding habitat and conservation priorities in Pterodroma baraui, an endangered gadfly petrel of the Mascarene archipelago. Biol. Conserv 2000, 93:135-8.
65. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2007, http://www.R-project.org, R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. [Cited 17 October 2006.] Available from URL:
66. Reyers B, van Jaarsveld A S. Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates. S. Afr. J. Sci 2000, 96:406-08.
67. Reyers B, van Jaarsveld A S, Kruger M. Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci 2000, 267:505-13.
68. Reyers B, Fairbanks D H K, van Jaarsveld A S, Thompson M. Priority areas for the conservation of South African vegetation: a coarse-filter approach. Divers. Distrib 2001, 7:79-95.
69. Reyers B, Wessels K J, van Jaarsveld A S. An assessment of biodiversity surrogacy options in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Afr. Zool 2002, 37:185-95.
70. Ricketts T H, Dinerstein D, Boucher T. Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:18497-501.
71. Rodrigues A S L, Gaston K J. How large do reserve networks need to be? Ecol. Lett 2001, 4:602-09.
72. Rodrigues A S L, Gregory R D, Gaston K J. Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnover. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci 2000, 267:49-55.
73. Rouget M. Measuring conservation value at fine and broad scales: implications for a diverse and fragmented region, the Agulhas Plain. Biol. Conserv 2003, 112:217-32.
74. Rouget M, Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Richardson D M. Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Divers. Distrib 2003, 9:191-210.
75. Sarkar S. Defining 'Biodiversity'; assessing biodiversity. The Monist 2002, 85:131-55.
76. Sarkar S, Margules C. Operationalizing biodiversity for conservation planning. J. Biosci. (Bangalore) 2002, 27(2):299-308. Suppl
77. Sarkar S, Aggarwal A, Garson J, Margules C R, Zeidler J. Place prioritization for biodiversity content. J. Biosci. (Bangalore) 2002, 27(2):339-46. Suppl
78. Sarkar S, Justus J, Fuller T. Effectiveness of environmental surrogates for the selection of conservation area networks. Conserv. Biol 2005, 19:815-25.
79. Sarkar S, Pressey R L, Faith D P. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 2006, 31:123-59.
80. Smith R J. Conservation Land-Use Zoning (CLUZ) software. 2004, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, UK
81. Stoms D M, Comer P J, Crist P J, Grossman D H. Choosing surrogates for biodiversity conservation in complex planning environments. J. Conserv. Plan 2005, 1:44-63.
82. Strasberg D, Rouget M, Richardson D M. An assessment of habitat diversity and transformation on La Réunion Island (Mascarene Islands, Indian Ocean) as a basis for identifying broad-scale conservation priorities. Biodivers. Conserv 2005, 14:3015-32.
83. Warman L D, Forsyth D M, Sinclair A R E. Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada. Ecol. Lett 2004a, 7:374-9.
84. Warman L D, Sinclair A R E, Scudder G G E, Klinkenberg B, Pressey R L. Sensitivity of systematic reserve selection to decisions about scale, biological data, and targets: case study from Southern British Columbia. Conserv. Biol 2004b, 18:655-66.
85. Warren B H, Bermingham E, Prys-Jones R P, Thebaud C. Immigration, species radiation and extinction in a highly diverse songbird lineage: white-eyes on Indian Ocean islands. Mol. Ecol 2006, 15:3769-86.
86. Wessels K J, Freitag S, van Jaarsveld A S. The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scale. Biol. Conserv 1999, 89:21-38.
87. Wilcove D S, Rothstein D, Dubow D, Phillips A, Losos E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 1998, 48:607-15.
88. Wilson K A, McBride M F, Bode M, Possingham H P. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 2006, 440:337-40.