Switching to digital television: Business and public policy issues

Standards and Public Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 345-371

  Maier, Norbert ^a   Ottaviani, Marco ^a  

^a LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954274401     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493249.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Adda, J., and M. Ottaviani 2005. “The transition to digital television,” Economic Policy 41: 160-209.
2. Anderson, S., and S. Coate 2005. “Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis,” Review of Economic Studies 72: 947-72.
3. Armstrong, M. 1999. “Competition in the pay-TV market,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 13: 257-80.
4. Armstrong, M. 2004. “Competition in two-sided markets,’ mimeo, London: University College London.
5. Cave, M., and R. Crandall 2001. “Sports rights and the broadcast industry,” Economic Journal 111: F4-26.
6. Coase, R. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission,” Journal of Law & Economics 2: 1-40.
7. Commission of the European Communities 2002. “eEurope 2005: An information society for all,” COM (2002) 263 final, Brussels.
8. Commission of the European Communities 2003. “Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting (from digital ‘switchover’ to analogue ‘switch-off’),” COM (2003) 541 final, Brussels.
9. Congressional Budget Office of the United States 1999. “Completing the transition to digital television,” Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
10. Cramton, P., E. Kwerel, and J. Williams 1998. “Efficient relocation of spectrum incumbents,” Journal of Law & Economics 41: 647-75.
11. Farrell, J., and C. Shapiro 1992. “Standard setting in high-definition television,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1-77.
12. Galperin, H. 2004. New television, old politics: The transition to digital TV in the United States and Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Grimme, K. 2002. Digital television: Standardization and strategies. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
14. Harbord, D., and M. Ottaviani 2001. “Contracts and competition in the UK pay-TV market,” Discussion Paper 01-5, London Business School.
15. Hart, J. 2004. Technology, television and competition: The politics of digital TV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hazlett, T. 2001. “The US digital TV transition: Time to toss the Negroponte Switch,” Working Paper 01-15, Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Centre for Regulatory Studies.
17. Katz, M. 2003. “Television over the Internet: Industry structure and competition absent distribution bottlenecks,” in Internet television, E. Noam.
18. J. Groebel, and D. Gerbarg (eds.), Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 31-59.
19. Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole 2000. Competition in telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Levy, J., M. Ford-Levy, and A. Levine 2002. “Broadcast television: Survivor in a sea of competition,” OPP Working Paper Series 37, Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.
21. Owen, B., and S. Wildman 1992. Video economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Riordan, M. 2002. “Universal residential telephone service,” in Handbook of telecommunications economics, M. Cave (ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 423-73.
23. Rochet, J. C., and J. Tirole 2003. “Platform competition in two-sided markets,” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 990-1029.
24. Rosston, G. L., and T. W. Hazlett 2001. “Comments of 37 concerned economists [on] promoting efficient use of spectrum through elimination of barriers to the development of secondary markets,” WT Docket No. 00-230, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.