Competition in the Pay-TV Market

Journal of the Japanese and International Economies

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 257-280

  Armstrong, Mark ^a  

^a NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347033152     PISSN: 08891583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jjie.1999.0434     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Armstrong M. Network interconnection in telecommunications. Econ. J. 108:1998;545-564.
2. Horsman M. Sky High. 1998;Orion, London.
3. Jehiel P., Moldovanu B., Stacchetti E. How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. Amer. Econ. Rev. 86:1996;814-829.
4. Kamien M., Tauman Y. Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quart. J. Econ. 101:1986;471-491.
5. Katz M., Shapiro C. How to license intangible property. Quart. J. Econ. 101:1986;567-589.
6. Laffont J.-J., Rey P., Tirole J. Network competition I: Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing. Rand J. Econ. 29:1998;1-37.
7. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1995). Telephone number portability, The Stationary Office, London.
8. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1999). British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Manchester United plc, The Stationary Office, London.
9. NERA, 1998, An analysis of the ITC report into channel bundling, NERA, London.
10. Office of Fair Trading, 1997, The Director General's review of BSkyB's position in the wholesale pay TV market, Office of Fair Trading, London.
11. Oftel, 1997a, Oftel submission to the ITC on competition issues arising from the award of digital terrestrial television multiplex licences, Oftel, London.
12. Oftel, 1997b, Bundling in the pay television market, Oftel, London.