Toothpaste allergy diagnosis and management

Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Otto, Sarah ^a   Zirwas, Matthew J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CINNAMYL ALCOHOL;

ACRODERMATITIS ENTEROPATHICA; AGED; ALLERGY TEST; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHEILITIS; DERMATITIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MALE; ORAL ERUPTION; RASH; SKIN ALLERGY; TOOTHPASTE ALLERGY; ZINC BLOOD LEVEL;

EID: 77954254318     PISSN: 19412789     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Academy of Periodontology. Consumer Survey. www.perio.org/consumer/cosmetic_data.htm. Accessed November 23, 2009.
2. Nielsen A. (2008) Delivering consumer clarity. Consumer Insight. http://en-usnielsen.com/main/ insight/consmer_insight. Accessed November 23, 2009.
3. Francalaci S, Sertoli A, Giorgini S, et al. Muticentre study of allergic contact cheilitis from toothpastes. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43:216-222.
4. Jardim J, Alves L, Martz M. The history and global market of oral home-care products. Brazilian Oral Research. 2009;23(1):17-22.
5. Scheman A, Jacob S, Zirwas M, et al. Contact allergy: alternatives for the 2007 North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) standard screening tray. Dis Mon. 2008;54(1-2):7-156.
6. Tremblay S, Avon S. Contact allergy to cinnamon: case report. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2008;74(5):445-448.
7. Magnusson B, Wilkinson DS. Cinnamic aldehyde in toothpaste. 1. Clinical aspects and patch tests. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1(2):70-76.
8. Mowad CM. Cocamidoproproply betaine allergy. Am J Contact Dermatol. 2001;1:223-224.
9. Mowad CM. Allergens of new and emerging significance. Dermatol Nurs. 2006;18(6):545-548.
10. Jacob SE, Amini, S. Cocamidopropyl betaine. Dermatitis. 2008;19(3)157-160.
11. Fowler JF, Zug KM, Taylor JS, et al. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine in North America. Dermatitis. 2004;15:5-6.
12. Zug KA, Rietschel RL, Warshaw EM, et al. The value of patch testing patients with a scattered generalized distribution of dermatitis: retrospective cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(3):426-431.
13. Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Geier J, et al. Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:247-259.
14. Funk JO, Maibach HI. Propylene glycol dermatitis: re-evaluation of an old problem. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;31:236-241.
15. Scheinman PL. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review. Am J Contact Dermat. 1996:7:65-76.
16. Trattne A, David, M, Lazrov A. Occupational contact dermatitis due to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58:282-284.
17. Rutherford T, Nixon R, Tam M, et al. Allergy to teat tree oil: retrospective review of 41 cases with positive patch tests over 4.5 years. Australas J Dermatol. 2007;48(2):83-87.
18. Coloe J, Zirwas M. Allergens in corticosteroid vehicles. Dermatitis. 2008;19(1):38-42.
19. Cashman A, Warshaw E. Parabens: a review of epidemiology, structure, allergenicity, and hormonal properties. Dermatitis. 2005;16(2):57-66.
20. Fisher AA. Paraben dermatitis due to a new medicated bandage: the "paraben paradox." Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5:273-274.
21. Basketter D, McFadden J, Evans P, et al. Identification and classification of skin sensitizers: identifying false positives and false negatives. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55;268-273.
22. Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 1998:36:347-363.
23. Langan SM, English JS. Occupational contact dermatitis from propolis in a dental technician. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56;43-57.
24. Walgrave SE, Warshaw EM, Glesne LA. Allergic contact dermatitis from propolis. Dermatitis. 2005;16(4);209-215.
25. Hsu CU, Chiang WC, Weng TI, et al. Laryngeal edema and anaphylactic shock after topical propolis use for acute pharyngitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22;432-433.