Cocamidopropyl betaine

Dermatitis

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 157-160

  Jacob, Sharon E ^a   Atnini, Sadegh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMIDOAMINE; AMINE; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; COSMETIC; DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYLAMINE; SHAMPOO; TOOTHPASTE;

CONTACT SENSITIZATION; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; HUMAN; HYGIENE PRODUCT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN IRRITATION; T LYMPHOCYTE;

BETAINE; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DETERGENTS; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 49249103878     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2008.06043     Document Type: Short Survey

References (42)

1. The Soap and Detergent Association. Soaps and detergents history. Available at: http://www.cleaning101.com/cleaning/history/ (accessed March 26, 2006).
2. Proctor & Gamble. History of washing. 2000, 2001. Available at: http://www.scienceinthebox.com (accessed March 26, 2006).
3. Kostka KL, McKay DD. Chemists clean up: a history and exploration of the craft of soapmaking. How soap came to be common in America. J Chem Educ 2002;79:1172-5.
4. Carol Ochs, Simply Soap. History of soapmaking. 1994. Available at: http://www.simplysoap.com/History%20of%20Soapmaking.htm (accessed April 3, 2006).
5. Royal Society of Chemistry. Surfactants: the ubiquitous amphophiles. 2004. Available at: http://www.chemsoc.org/chembytes/ezine/2003/ hargreaves_jul03.htm (accessed March 26, 2006).
6. Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia. Detergent. 2000-2005. Available at: http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0815306.html (accessed Oct 8, 2005).
7. Huntington SJ. The mystery and history of soap. 2005. Available at: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0513/p18s02-hfks.html (accessed Sep 23, 2005).
8. Campbell LA, Campbell HA. Development of the detergent industry. 1998-2005. Available at: http://www.chemistry.co.nz/deterghistory.htm (accessed Apr 2, 2006).
9. Proctor & Gamble. Natural and synthetic surfactants. 2000, 2001. Available at: www.scienceinthebox.com (accessed Mar 26, 2006).
10. Soap and Detergent Association. Soaps and detergents chemistry. Available at: (http://www.cleaning101.com/cleaning/chemistry/ (accessed Apr 3, 2006).
11. Barany E, Lindberg M, Loden M. Biophysical characterization of skin damage and recovery after exposure to different surfactants. Contact Dermatitis 1999;40:98-103.
12. Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Moore DJ, Subramanyan K, et al. Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatol Ther 2004; 17 Suppl 1:16-25.
13. Vilaplana J, Mascaro JM, Trullas C, et al. Human irritant response to different qualities and concentrations of cocoamidopropylbetaines: a possible model of paradoxical irritant response. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26:289-94.
14. Somasundaran P, Zhang L, Anjing L. Surfactants and interfacial phenomena in cosmetics and detergency. Cosmetics Toiletries 2001;116:53-60.
15. Expert Panel of the American College of Toxicology. Final report on the safety assessment of cocamidopropyl betaine. J Am Coll Toxicol 1991;10:33-52.
16. Peter C, Hoting E. Contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB). Contact Dermatitis 1992;26:282-3.
17. Begoun P. Baby shampoo. In: Asmus S, Hopper J, Forbes Provo J, Parsons S, editors. Don't go shopping for hair-care products without me. 3rd ed. Seattle, Washington: Beginning Press; 2004. p. 80.
18. Mowad CM. Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy. Am J Contact Dermat 2001;12:223-4.
19. de Groot AC, van der Walle HB, Weyland JW. Contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:419-22.
20. Korting HC, Parsch EM, Enders F, Przybilla B. Allergic contact dermatitis to cocamidopropyl betaine in shampoo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;27(6 Pt 1):1013-5.
21. Environmental Working Group. Skin deep. A safety assessment of ingredients in personal care products. Available at: www.ewg.org (accessed Mar 26, 2006).
22. Meyers B, Personal letter. Compliance and Regulations Team, HFS-125. Office of Cosmetics and Colors. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Food and Drug Administration. 2005.
23. Saripalli YV, Achen F, Belsito DV. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:65-9.
24. Fowler JF, Fowler LM, Hunter IE. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study. Contact Dermatitis 1997;37:276-81.
25. Fowkr JF. Contact allergen of the year. Cocamidopropyl betaine. Dermatitis 2004;15:3-4.
26. Van Haute N, Dooms-Goossens A. Shampoo dermatitis due to cocobetaine and sodium lauryl ether sulphate. Contact Dermatitis 1983;9:169.
27. Taniguchi S, Katoh J, Hisa T, et al. Shampoo dermatitis due to cocamidopropyl betaine. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26:139.
28. de Groot AC, de Wit FS, Bos JD, Weyland JW. Contact allergy to cocamide DEA and lauramide DEA in shampoos. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16:117-8.
29. Sertoli A, Lombardi P, Palleschi GM, et al. Tegobetaine in contact lens solutions. Contact Dermatitis 1897;16:111-2.
30. Herlofson BB, Barkvoll P. The effect of two toothpaste detergents on the frequency of recurrent aphthous ulcers. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:150-3.
31. Fowler JF. Cocamidopropyl betaine: the significance of positive patch test results in twelve patients. Cutis 1993;52:281-4.
32. Marriott M, Holmes J, Peters L, et al. The complex problem of sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:93-9.
33. Armstrong DK, Smith HR, Ross JS, White IR. Sensitization to cocamidopropylbetaine: an 8-year review. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40:335-6.
34. Angelini G, Rigano L, Foti C, et al. Pure cocamidopropylbetaine is not the allergen in patients with positive reactions to commercial cocamidopropylbetaine. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:252-3.
35. Angelini G, Rigano L. The allergen cocamidopropyl betaine. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:210-1.
36. Fowler JF, Zug KM, Taylor JS, et al. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine in North America. Dermatitis 2004;15:5-6.
37. Brey NL, Fowler JF. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine. Dermatitis 2004;15:7-9.
38. Foti C, Bonamonte D, Mascolo G, et al. The role of 3- dimemylaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:194-8.
39. Hervella M, Yanguas JI, Iglesias ME, et al. Contact allergy to 3-dimethylaminopropylamine and cocamidopropyl betaine. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2006;97:189-95.
40. Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association (CTFA). Cosmetic ingredient review (CIR). December 2005. Available at: http://www.ch-safety.org/ staff_files/safewithqualifications.pdf (accessed Apr 20, 2006).
41. Cocamidopropyl betaine. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory. 2003 Sep 4. Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS).
42. Mekos Laboratories. Mekos T.R.U.E Test. Available at: http://www.orion-health.co.nz/TT%20Panel%203.htm (accessed Apr 20, 2006).