Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 963-969

  Suzuki, M ^a   Kurimoto, S ^a   Shinohara, T ^a   Tatebe, M ^a   Imaeda, T ^a,b   Hirata, H ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KINJO GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM SHOULDER AND HAND QUESTIONNAIRE JAPANESE VERSION; FEMALE; HAND 20 QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954248755     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B7.23410     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dawson J, Carr A. Outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:313-15.
2. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160-4.
3. King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, et al. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function: Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:351-4.
4. Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability: The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998;26:764-72.
5. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993;75-A:1585-92.
6. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand [corrected]: The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602-8.
7. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts?: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14:128-46.
8. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:330-40. (Pubitemid 30165598)
9. Imaeda T, Toh S, Nakao Y, et al. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:353-9.
10. Imaeda T, Hirata H, Toh S, et al. Comparative responsiveness of Japanese versions of the DASH and SF-36 questionnaires and physical measurement to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release. Hand Surg 2006;11:27-33.
11. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:613-18.
12. Offenbäacher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 2003;62:168-77.
13. Rosales RS, Delgado EB, Díez de la Lastra-Bosch I. Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27:334-43.
14. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg Br 2003;28:179-86.
15. Lee EW, Lau JS, Chung MM, Li AP, Lo SK. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study. J Hand Ther 2004;17:417-23.
16. Lee EW, Chung MM, Li AP, Lo SK. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). J Hand Surg Br 2005;30:29-34.
17. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
18. No authors listed. The DASH outcome measure: frequently asked questions. http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/faq.htm (date last accessed 9 March 2010).
19. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing 1995;24:120-5.
20. No authors listed. International Standard Classification of Occupations. International Labour Organization: ISCO-88. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/ bureau/stat/ isco/isco88/index.htm (date last accessed 9 March 2010).
21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988:147-51.
22. Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose? Int Orthop 2008;32:1-6.
23. Boulos MNK. Readability assessment of british internet information resources on diabetes mellitus targeting lay persons. University of Bath, 2004. http://healthcybermap. semanticweb.org/publications/readability.ppt (date last accessed 9 March 2010).
24. Walmsley SA, Scott K, Lehrer R. Effects of document simplification on the reading comprehension of the elderly. Journal of Reading Behavior 1981;13:237-48.
25. Patel VL, Branch T, Arocha JF. Errors in interpreting quantities as procedures: the case of pharmaceutical labels. Int J Med Inform 2002;65:193-211.
26. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Losclazo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006;61:173-90.
27. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ 1986;134:889-95. (Pubitemid 16013788)
28. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparison of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28:632-42.
29. Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:208-15. (Pubitemid 37127481)
30. Jester A, Harth A, German G. Meauring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30:1074.
31. Alotaibi NM. The cross-cultural adaptation of the disability of arm, soulder and hand (DASH): a systematic review. Occup Ther Int 2008;15:178-90.
32. Orfale AG, Araújo PM, Ferrax MB, Natour J. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005;38:293-302. (Pubitemid 40372606)
33. Themistocleous GD, Goudelis G, Kyrou I, et al. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther 2006;19:350-7.
34. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-32.