Auditory motor integration in oral and manual effectors

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 233-239

  Loucks, Torrey M J ^a   Ofori, Edward ^a   Grindrod, Christopher M ^a   De Nil, Luc F ^b   Sosnoff, Jacob J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

auditory feedback; force control; sensorimotor integration; variability

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; INNERVATION; LIP; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSDUCER;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSDUCERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954230656     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2010.492723     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andreatta, R. D., Barlow, S.M., & Finan, D. S. (1994).Modulation of the mechanically evoked perioral reflex during active force dynamics in young adults. Brain Research, 646, 175-179.
2. Barlow, S. M., & Abbs, J. H. (1983). Force transducers for the evaluation of labial, lingual, and mandibular motor impairments. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 26, 616-621.
3. Barlow, S. M., & Burton, M. K. (1990). Ramp-and-hold force control in the upper and lower lips: Developing new neuromotor assessment applications in traumatically brain injured adults. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 33, 660-675.
4. Bauer, J. J., Mittal, J., Larson, C. R., & Hain, T. C. (2006). Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 119, 2363-2371.
5. Burnett, T. A., Freedland, M. B., Larson, C. R.,&Hain, T. C. (1998). Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 103, 3153-3161.
6. Callan, D. E., Kent, R. D., Guenther, F. H., & Vorperian, H. K. (2000). An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 721-736.
7. De Nil, L. F., & Lafaille, S. J. (2002). Jaw and finger movement accuracy under visual and nonvisual feedback conditions. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 95, 1129-1140.
8. Gentil, M., & Tournier, C. L. (1998). Differences in fine control of forces generated by the tongue, lips and fingers in humans. Archives of Oral Biology, 43, 517-523.
9. Guenther, F. H. (1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review, 102, 594-621.
10. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105, 611-633.
11. Hamill, T. A., & Price, L. L. (2008). The hearing sciences. Abingdon, England: Plural Publishing.
12. Jacobs, R., van Steenberghe, D., & Schotte, A. (1992). The importance of visual feedback on the accuracy of jaw and finger positioning in man. Archives of Oral Biology, 37, 677-683.
13. Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Guenther, F. H., Denny, M., Perkell, J. S., Stockmann, E., et al. (2007). Effects of short- and longterm changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 913-927.
14. Moore, B. C. J. (2004). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (5th ed.). London: Elsevier.
15. Prodoehl, J.,Yu,H.,Wasson, P.,Corcos, D. M.,&Vaillancourt, D. E. (2008). Effects of visual and auditory feedback on sensorimotor circuits in the basal ganglia. Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 3042-3051.
16. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinematics.
17. Sosnoff, J. J., & Newell, K. M. (2006). Are age-related increases in force variability due to decrements in strength? Experimental Brain Research, 174, 86-94.
18. Stal, P. (1994). Characterization of human oro-facial and masticatory muscles with respect to fibre types, myosins and capillaries. Morphological, enzyme-histochemical, immuno-histochemical and biochemical investigations. Swedish Dental Journal Supplement, 98, 1-55.
19. Stal, P., Ericksson, P. O., Ericksson, A., & Thornell, L. E. (1987). Enzyme-histochemical differences in fibre-type between the human major and minor zygomatic and the first dorsal interosseus muscles. Archives of Oral Biology, 32, 833-841.
20. Stal, P., Eriksson, P. O., Eriksson, A., & Thornell, L. E. (1990). Enzyme-histochemical and morphological characteristics of muscle fibre types in the human buccinator and orbicularis oris. Archives of Oral Biology, 35, 449-458.
21. Sussman, H. M. (1971). The laterality effect in lingual-auditory tracking. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 49, 1874-1880.
22. Sussman, H. M., MacNeilage, P. F., & Lumbley, J. (1974). Sensorimotor dominance and the right-ear advantage in mandibularauditory tracking. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 56, 214-216.
23. Sussman, H. M., MacNeilage, P. F., & Lumbley, J. L. (1975). Pursuit auditory tracking of dichotically presented tonal amplitudes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 18, 74-81.
24. Van Steenberghe, D., Bonte, B., Schols, H., Jacobs, R., & Schotte, A. (1991). The precision of motor control in human jaw and limb muscles during isometric contraction in the presence of visual feedback. Archives of Oral Biology, 36, 545-547.
25. Villacorta, V. M., Perkell, J. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2007). Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 122, 2306-2319.
26. Weismer, G. (2006). Philosophy of research in motor speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 315-349.
27. Ziegler,W. (2003). Speech motor control is task-specific: Evidence from dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 17, 3-36.