Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 913-927

  Lane, Harlan ^a,b,e   Matthies, Melanie L ^c   Guenther, Frank H ^c   Denny, Margaret ^b   Perkell, Joseph S ^c   Stockmann, Ellen ^b   Tiede, Mark ^b   Vick, Jennell ^b,d   Zandipour, Majid ^c  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e University of Washington ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Cochlear implants; Phoneme contrasts

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MALE; PHONATION; SIBILANT; SPEECH; VOWEL; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AGE; AGED; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH DISORDER;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTICULATION DISORDERS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HEARING; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH;

EID: 34548572538     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/065)     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agelfors, E. (1996). A comparison between patients using cochlear implants and hearing aids. I: Results on speech tests. TMH-QPSR, 37, 63-76 (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Speech, Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report).
2. Bailly, G., Laboissière, R., & Schwartz, J. L. (1991). Formant trajectories as audible gestures: An alternative for speech synthesis. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 9-23.
3. Baum, S. R., & McFarland, D. H. (1997). The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2353-2359.
4. Blamey, P. J., Dowell, R. C., Brown, A. M., Clark, G. M., & Seligman, P. M. (1987). Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 48-57.
5. Burnett, T. A., Freedland, M. B., Larson, C. R., & Hain, T. C. (1998). Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 3153-3161.
6. Callan, D. E., Kent, R. D., Guenther, F. H., & Vorperian, H. K. (2000). An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 721-736.
7. Cowie, R., & Cowie, E. D. (1992). Postlingually acquired deafness: Speech deterioration and the wider consequences. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Cowie, R., & Douglas-Cowie, E. (1983). Speech production in profound postlingual deafness. In M. Lutman & M. P. Haggard ( Eds.), Hearing science and hearing disorders ( pp. 183-230). London: Academic Press.
9. Economou, A., Tartter, V., Chute, P., & Hellman, S. (1992). Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1310-1323.
10. Fairbanks, G. (1954). Systematic research in experimental phonetics: I. A theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 19, 133-139.
11. Flege, J. E., Fletcher, S. G., & Homiedan, A. (1988). Compensating for a bite block in /s/ and /t/ production: Palatographic, acoustic, and perceptual data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 212-228.
12. Forrest, K., Weismer, G., Milenkovic, P., & Dougall, R. N. (1988). Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 115-123.
13. Goehl, H., & Kaufman, D. (1984). Do the effects of adventitious deafness include disordered speech? Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 53-58.
14. Guenther, F. H. (1994). A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 43-53.
15. Guenther, F. H. (1995). Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review, 102, 594-621.
16. Guenther, F. H. (2006). Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 350-365.
17. Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96, 280-301.
18. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105, 611-633.
19. Guenther, F. H., Husain, F. T., Cohen, M. A., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (1999). Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2900-2912.
20. Hain, T. C., Burnett, T. A., Larson, C. R., & Kiran, S. (2001). Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2146-2152.
21. Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (1998, February 20). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science, 279, 1213-1216.
22. Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Sensorimotor adaptation of speech. I: Compensation and adaptation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 295-310.
23. Jones, J. A., & Munhall, K. G. (2003). Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: The role of auditory feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 532-543.
24. Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252-1263.
25. Kawahara, H., & Williams, J. C. (1996). Effects of auditory feedback on voice pitch trajectories: Characteristic responses to pitch perturbations. In P. J. Davis & N. H. Fletcher (Eds.), Vocal fold physiology (pp. 263-278). San Diego, CA: Singular.
26. Kawato, M., & Gomi, H. (1992). The cerebellum and VOR/OKR learning models. Trends in Neurosciences, 5, 445-453.
27. Kessler, D. K. (1999). The CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 177(Suppl.), 8-16.
28. Kishon-Rabin, L., Taitelbaum, R., Tobin, Y., & Hildesheimer, M. (1999). The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2843-2857.
29. Lane, H., Denny, M., Guenther, F., Matthies, M., Menard, L., Perkell, J., et al. (2005). Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1636-1646.
30. Lane, H., Matthies, M., Perkell, J., Vick, J., & Zandipour, M. (2001). The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 552-563.
31. Lane, H., & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 677-709.
32. Lane, H., & Webster, J. (1991). Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 859-866.
33. Lane, H., Wozniak, J., Matthies, M., Svirsky, M., & Perkell, J. (1995). Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: An exploration of voice-onset time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 3096-3106.
34. Lane, H., Wozniak, J., & Perkell, J. (1994). Changes in voice-onset time in speakers with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 56-64.
35. Langereis, M. C. (1997). Effects of cochlear implantation on speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht: Utrecht, the Netherlands.
36. Langereis, M. C., Bosman, A. J., van Olphen, A. F., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1997). Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users. Audiology, 36, 279-297.
37. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H & H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal ( Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling ( pp. 403-439). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
38. Matthies, M. L., Svirsky, M. A., Lane, H. L., & Perkell, J. S. (1994). A preliminary study of the effects of cochlear implants on the production of sibilants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 1367-1373.
39. Matthies, M., Svirsky, M., Perkell, J., & Lane, H. (1996). Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 936-946.
40. McFarland, D. H., & Baum, S. R. (1995). Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1865-1873.
41. McFarland, D. H., Baum, S. R., & Chabot, C. (1996). Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1093-1104.
42. McKay, C. M., & McDermott, H. J. (1993). Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP). Ear and Hearing, 14, 350-367.
43. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
44. Natke, U., & Kalveram, K. T. (2001). Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 577-584.
45. Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Perrier, P., Vick, J., et al. (2000). A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 233-372.
46. Perkell, J., Lane, H., Svirsky, M., & Webster, J. (1992). Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2961-2978.
47. Perkell, J. S., Zandipour, M., Matthies, M. L., & Lane, H. (2002). Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I: A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1627-1641.
48. Perrier, P., Ostry, D. J., & Laboissiere, R. (1996). The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 365-378.
49. Plant, G. (1984). The effects of an acquired profound hearing loss on speech production. British Journal of Audiology, 18, 39-48.
50. Richardson, L. M., Busby, P. A., Blamey, P. J., Dowell, R. C., & Clark, G. M. (1993). The effects of auditory feedback from the Nucleus cochlear implant on the vowel formant frequencies produced by children and adults. Ear and Hearing, 14, 339-349.
51. Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1, 333-382.
52. Schenk, B. S., Baumgartner, W. D., & Hamzavi, J. S. (2003). Changes in vowel quality after cochlear implantation. ORL Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Related Specialties, 65, 184-188.
53. Siegel, G. M., Schork, E. J., Pick, H. L., & Garber, S. R. (1982). Parameters of auditory feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 473-475.
54. Smyth, V., Murdoch, B., McCormack, P., & Marshall, I. (1991). Objective and subjective evaluation of subjects fitted with the cochlear multichannel prostheses: 3 studies. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 19, 31-52.
55. Svirsky, M., Lane, H., Perkell, J., & Wozniak, J. (1992). Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1284-1300.
56. Svirsky, M. A., Silveira, A., Neuburger, H., Teoh, S. W., & Suarez, H. (2004). Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map. Acta Otolaryngololgica, 124, 381-386.
57. Svirsky, M., & Tobey, E. (1991). Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2895-2904.
58. Tourville, J. A., Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., Reilly, K. J., & Bohland, J. W. (2005, June). Effects of acoustic and articulatory perturbation on cortical activity during speech production. Paper presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Toronto, Canada.
59. Tyler, R. S., Parkinson, A. J., Woodworth, G. G., Lowder, M. W., & Gantz, B. J. (1997). Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or nucleus cochlear implant. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 508-522.
60. Tyler, R. S., Preece, J. P., & Lowder, M. W. (1983). The Iowa Cochlear Implant Test Battery. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
61. Vick, J., Lane, H., Perkell, J., Gould, J., & Zandipour, M. (2001). Covariation of cochlear implant users' perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1257-1267.
62. Villacorta, V., Perkell, J. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2005). Relations between speech sensorimotor adaptation and perceptual acuity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2618-2619.
63. Waldstein, R. (1990). Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2099-2114.
64. Wang, M. D., & Bilger, R. C. (1973). Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1248-1266.
65. Wilson, B., Lawson, D., Zerbi, M., Finley, C., & Wolford, R. (1995). New processing strategies in cochlear implantation. American Journal of Otology, 16, 669-681.
66. Zimmermann, G. N., & Collins, M. J. (1985). The speech of the adventitiously deaf and auditory information: A reply to Goehl and Kaufman (1984). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 220-221.