Improving (meta)cognitive tutoring by detecting and responding to uncertainty

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-09-02, Issue , 2009, Pages 64-69

  Litman, Diane ^a   Forbes Riley, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; METACOGNITIVES; SELF-MONITORING; STUDENT LEARNING;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77954230203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Aist, G.; Kort, B.; Reilly, R.; Mostow, J.; and Picard, R. 2002. Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: Adding human-provided emotional scaffolding to an automated reading tutor that listens. In Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Workshop on Empirical Methods for Tutorial Dialogue Systems.
2. Aleven, V., and Roll, I., eds. 2007. AIED Workshop on Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
3. Brennan, S. E., and Williams, M. 1995. The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language.
4. Craig, S.; Graesser, A.; Sullins, J.; and Gholson, B. 2004. Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media 29(3).
5. Dijkstra, C.; Krahmer, E.; and Swerts, M. 2006. Manipulating uncertainty: The contribution of different audiovisual prosodic cues to the perception of confidence. In Proc. Speech Prosody.
6. Forbes-Riley, K., and Litman, D. J. 2008. Analyzing dependencies between student certainness states and tutor responses in a spoken dialogue corpus. In Dybkjaer, L., and Minker, W., eds., Recent Trends in Discourse and Dialogue. Springer.
7. Forbes-Riley, K., and Litman, D. 2009a. Adapting to student uncertainty improves tutoring dialogues. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
8. Forbes-Riley, K., and Litman, D. 2009b. A user modeling-based performance analysis of a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive dialogue system corpus. In Proceedings of Interspeech.
9. Forbes-Riley, K.; Litman, D.; and Rotaru, M. 2008. Responding to student uncertainty during computer tutoring: A preliminary evaluation. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
10. Forbes-Riley, K.; Rotaru, M.; and Litman, D. 2008. The relative impact of student affect on performance models in a spoken dialogue tutoring system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
11. Kelemen, W. L.; Frost, P. J.; and Weaver, C. A. 2000. Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory and Cognition 28:92-107.
12. Liscombe, J.; Venditti, J.; and Hirschberg, J. 2005. Detecting certainness in spoken tutorial dialogues. In Proc. Interspeech.
13. Litman, D.; Moore, J.; Dzikovska, M.; and Farrow, E. 2009. Using natural language processing to analyze tutorial dialogue corpora across domains and modalities. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
14. Nicholas, G.; Rotaru, M.; and Litman, D. J. 2006. Exploiting word-level features for emotion prediction. In Proc. IEEE/ACL Workshop on Spoken Language Technology.
15. Nietfeld, J. L.; Enders, C. K.; and Schraw, G. 2006. A monte carlo comparison of measures of relative and absolute monitoring accuracy. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
16. Pon-Barry, H.; Schultz, K.; Bratt, E. O.; Clark, B.; and Peters, S. 2006. Responding to student uncertainty in spoken tutorial dialogue systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16.
17. Pon-Barry, H. 2008. Prosodic manifestations of confidence and uncertainty in spoken language. In Proc. Interspeech.
18. Roll, I., and Aleven, V., eds. 2008. ITS Workshop on Meta-Cognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies.
19. Saadawi, G. M. E.; Azevedo, R.; Castine, M.; Payne, V.; Medvedeva, O.; Tseytlin, E.; Legowski, E.; azen Jukic, D.; and Crowley, R. S. 2009. Factors affecting feeling-of-knowing in a medical intelligent tutoring system: the role of immediate feedback as a metacognitive scaffold. Adv in Helth Sci Educ.
20. Smith, V. L., and Clark, H. H. 1993. On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language.
21. Tsukahara, W., and Ward, N. 2001. Responding to subtle, fleeting changes in the user's internal state. In Proc. SIG-CHI on Human factors in computing systems.
22. VanLehn, K.; Jordan, P. W.; Rosé, C.; Bhembe, D.; Böttner, M.; Gaydos, A.; Makatchev, M.; Pappuswamy, U.; Ringenberg, M.; Roque, A.; Siler, S.; Srivastava, R.; and Wilson, R. 2002. The architecture of Why2-Atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
23. VanLehn, K.; Siler, S.; and Murray, C. 2003. Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction 21(3).