A user modeling-based performance analysis of a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive dialogue system corpus

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 2467-2470

  Forbes Riley, Kate ^a   Litman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect attitude adaptation; Spoken dialogue; Subjective and objective metrics; Tutoring system; User modeling

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; DATA SETS; OBJECTIVE METRICS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; TUTORING SYSTEM; USER CLASS; USER MODELING; USER SATISFACTION;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION; SPEECH PROCESSING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 70450185433     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19909772     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. C.M. Lee and S. Narayanan, "Towards detecting emotions in spoken dialogs," IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 13, no. 2, March 2005.
2. K. Liu and R. W. Picard, "Embedded empathy in continuous, interactive health assessment," in CHIWorkshop on HCI Challenges in Health Assessment, 2005.
3. K. Forbes-Riley and D. Litman, "Adapting to student uncertainty improves tutoring dialogues," in Proceedings 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Brighton, UK, July 2009.
4. I. Zukerman and D. Litman, "Natural language processing and user modeling: Synergies and limitations," User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 129-158, 2001.
5. D. Litman and S. Pan, "Designing and evaluating an adaptive spoken dialogue system," User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 12, no. 2/3, pp. 111-137, 2002.
6. J. Chu-Carroll and J. S. Nickerson, "Evaluating automatic dialogue strategy adaptation for a spoken dialogue system," in Proc. NAACL, 2000, pp. 202-209.
7. K. Georgila, M.Wolters, and J.Moore, "Simulating the behaviour of older versus younger users when interaction with spoken dialogue systems," in Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT Short Papers (Companion Volume), Columbus, Ohio, June 2008, pp. 49-52.
8. S. Janarthanam and O. Lemon, "User simulations for online adaptation and knowledge-alignment in troubleshooting dialogue systems," in Workshops on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogues (SEMdial), London, June 2008.
9. E. Reiter, S. Sripada, and S. Williams, "Acquiring and using limited user models in nlg," in Proceedings of 2003 European Natural Language Generation Workshop, 2003, pp. 87-94.
10. S. Moller, P. Smeele, H. Boland, and J. Krebber, "Evaluating spoken dialogue systems according to de-facto standards: A case study," Computer Speech and Language, vol. 21, pp. 26-53, 2007.
11. K. VanLehn, P. W. Jordan, C. P. Rosé, D. Bhembe, M. Böttner, A. Gaydos, M. Makatchev, U. Pappuswamy, M. Ringenberg, A. Roque, S. Siler, R. Srivastava, and R.Wilson, "The architecture of Why2-Atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing," in Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2002.
12. K. VanLehn, S. Siler, and C. Murray, "Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring?" Cognition and Instruction, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 209-249, 2003.
13. W. Tsukahara and N. Ward, "Responding to subtle, fleeting changes in the user's internal state," in Proc. SIG-CHI on Human factors in computing systems. Seattle, WA: ACM, 2001.
14. C. P. Rose, J. D. Moore, K. Vanlehn, and D. Allbritton, "A comparative evaluation of socratic versus didactic tutoring," in Proc. Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2001, pp. 869-874.
15. K. Bhatt, M. Evens, and S. Argamon, "Hedged responses and expressions of affect in human/human and human/computer tutorial interactions," in Proceedings of Cognitive Science (CogSci), Chicago, USA, 2004, pp. 114-119.
16. K. E. Boyer, M. A. Vouk, and J. C. Lester, "The influence of learner characteristics on task-oriented tutorial dialogue," in Proceedings of AIED, Los Angeles, CA, 2007.
17. A. L. Baylor, J. Ryu, and E. Shen, "The effect of pedagogical agent voice and animation on learning, motivation, and perceived persona," in Proc. ED-MEDIA, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 2003.
18. M.Walker, A. Rudnicky, R. Prasad, J. Aberdeen, E. Bratt, J. Garofolo, H. Hastie, A. Le, B. Pellom, A. Potamianos, R. Passonneau, S. Roukos, G. Sanders, S. Seneff, and D. Stallard, "DARPA Communicator: Cross-system results for the 2001 evaluation," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Denver, Colorado, USA, 2002, pp. 269-272.
19. K. Moreno, B. Klettke, K. Nibbaragandla, and A. Graesser, "Perceived characteristics and pedagogical efficacy of animated conversational agents," in Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (ITS), Biarritz, France, 2002.