Modelling the intake of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans: Impact of energy under-reporting and number of reporting days in dietary surveys

Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1170-1176

  Hirvonen, Tero ^a,b   Sinkko, Harri ^b   Hallikainen, Anja ^a   Kiviranta, Hannu ^b   Pietinen, Pirjo ^b   Valsta, Liisa ^b   Tuomisto, Jouni T ^b  

^a NATL VET AND FOOD RES INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Dioxins; Exposure; Fish and fish products; Probability modelling; Risk assessment; Survey

Indexed keywords

DIBENZOFURAN DERIVATIVE; POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZODIOXIN; BENZOFURAN DERIVATIVE; DIOXIN; POLLUTANT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; ENERGY; FEMALE; FOOD; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANIMAL; CALORIC INTAKE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FINLAND; FISH; FOOD CONTAMINATION; MIDDLE AGED; POLLUTANT; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEA FOOD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; ANIMALS; BENZOFURANS; DIET; DIET RECORDS; DIET SURVEYS; DIOXINS; ENERGY INTAKE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FEMALE; FINLAND; FISHES; FOOD CONTAMINATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEAFOOD; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77954208273     PISSN: 19440049     EISSN: 14645122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19440041003724863     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cook A, Pryer J, Shetty P. 2000. The problem of accuracy in dietary surveys: analysis of the over 65 UK national Diet and Nutrition Survey. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 54:611-6.
2. Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM. 2006. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Dietetic Assoc. 106:1640-50.
3. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Prentice AM. 1991. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 45:569-81.
4. Hirvonen T, Mannisto S, Roos E, Pietinen P. 1997. Underreporting does not distort dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr. 51:297-301.
5. Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Dufour A, Volatier JL, Telman J, Virtanen M, Becker W, De Henauw S. 2002. Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr. 56:S53-S62.
6. Iman RL, Conover WJ. 1982. A distribution-free approach to including rank correlation among input variables. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 11:311-334.
7. Isosaari P, Hallikainen A, Kiviranta H, Vuorinen PJ, Parmanne R, Koistinen J, Vartiainen T. 2006. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, biphe-nyls, naphthalenes and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the edible fish caught from the Baltic Sea and lakes in Finland. Environ Pollut. 141:213-225.
8. Krebs-Smith SM, Graubard BI, Kahle LL, Subar AF, Cleveland LE, Ballard-Barbash R. 2000. Low energy reporters vs others: a comparison of reported food intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 54:281-7.
9. Kroes R, Muller D, Lambe J, Lowik MRH, van Klaveren J, Kleiner J, Massey R, Mayer S, Urieta I, Verger P, Visconti A. 2002. Assessment of intake from diet. Food Chem Toxicol. 40:327-85.
10. Liem AKD, Furst P, Rappe C. 2000. Exposure of populations to dioxins and related compounds. Food Addit Contam. 17:241-259.
11. Maurer J, Taren DL, Teixeira PJ, Thompson CA, Lohman TG, Going SB, Houtkooper LB. 2006. The psychosocial and behavioral characteristics related to energy misreporting. Nutr Rev. 64:53-66.
12. Nusser SM, Carriquiry AL, Dodd KW, Fuller WA. 1996. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 91:1440-9.
13. Paturi M, Tapanainen H, Reinivuo H, Pietinen P. editors. 2008. National FINDIET 2007 Survey. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute.
14. SCF. 2001. Update of the ''Risk assessment of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in food'' based on new scientific information available since the adoption of the SCF opinion of 22nd November 2000; Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food, adopted on 30 May 2001. Brussels: European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General.
15. Shetty P. 2005. Energy requirements of adults. Publ Health Nutr. 8:994-1009.
16. Stallone DD, Brunner EJ, Bingham SA, Marmot MG. 1997. Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: the influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 51:815-25.
17. WHO Temporary Advisers. 2000. Consultation on assessment of the health risk of dioxins; re-evaluation of the tolerable daily intake (TDI): executive summary. Food Addit Contam. 17:223-240.
18. Wiborg ML, Knutsen HK, Andersson O, Buchert A, Cederberg T, Darnerud PO, Hallikainen A, Kiviranta H, Olafsdottir K, Petersen K, Rajakangas L, Sletta A. 2008. EU maximum levels for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs - Impact on exposure and food supply in the Nordic countries. TemaNord. 531.