Corrigendum to Seven posers in the constructivist classroom (London Review of Education, (2010) 8, 2, (177-187), 10.1080/14748460.2010.487340);Seven posers in the constructivist classroom

London Review of Education

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 177-187

  Kotzee, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constructivism; Epistemology; Higher education; Learning theory; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954202526     PISSN: 14748460     EISSN: 14748479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14748460.2012.762188     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. Boghossian, P. 2006. Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon.
2. Confrey, J. 1990. What constructivism implies for teaching. In Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics, ed. R.B. Davis, C.A. Maher, and N. Noddings, 107-22. Reston, VA: NCTM.
3. Davidson, D. 1984. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation, 183-199. Oxford: Clarendon.
4. Geelan, D.R. 2006. Undead theories: Constructivism, eclecticism and research in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
5. Hacking, I. 2000. The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Howe, K.R., and J. Berv. 2000. Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues, ed. D.C. Phillips, 19-40. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Jervis, L.M., and L. Jervis. 2005. What is the constructivism in constructive alignment? Bioscience Education 6. www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol6/Beej-6-5.aspx.
8. Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Larochelle, M., and N. Bednarz. 1998. Constructivism and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Loving, C.C., and W.A. Cobern. 2000. Invoking Thomas Kuhn: What citation analysis reveals for science education. Science and Education 9, no. 1/2: 187-206.
11. Matthews, M.R. 1998. Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Matthews, M.R. 2000. Appraising constructivism in science and mathematics education. In Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues, ed. D.C. Phillips, 161-192. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Nola, R., and G. Irzik. 2005. Philosophy, science, education and culture. Dordrecht: Springer.
14. Pendlebury, S. 2005. Feminism, epistemology and education. In The RoutledgeFalmer reader in philosophy of education, ed. W. Carr, 50-62. London: Routledge.
15. Phillips, D.C. 1995. The good, the bad and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher 24, no. 7: 5-12.
16. Quale, A. 2007. Radical constructivism and the sin of relativism. Science and Education 16, no. 3/5: 231-266.
17. Shay, S. 2008. Beyond social constructive perspectives on assessment: The centering of knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education 13, no. 5: 595-605.
18. Siegel, H. 1988. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education. London: Routledge.
19. Von Glasersfeld, E. 1996. Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations. In Theories of mathematical learning, ed. L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, and B. Greer, 307-314. London: Routledge.
20. Young, M.F.D. 2008. Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.