Interpolation of steady-state concentration data by inverse modeling

Ground Water

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 569-579

  Schwede, Ronnie L ^a   Cirpka, Olaf A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVECTION-DISPERSION EQUATION; BETA DISTRIBUTIONS; CONCENTRATION VALUES; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ANALYSIS; FLOW AND TRANSPORT; GEOSTATISTICAL; HIGHLY NONLINEAR; HYDROLOGICAL DATA; INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES; INVERSE MODELING; KRIGING; LINEAR INTERPOLATION; MONTE CARLO APPROACH; NON-LINEARITY; NONGAUSSIANITY; OBSERVATION POINT; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STEADY-STATE CONCENTRATIONS; TEST CASE; TRANSPORT SIMULATION; UNCERTAIN MATERIAL PROPERTIES; UNCERTAINTY BOUNDS;

GROUNDWATER; INTERPOLATION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS);

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA INTERPRETATION; FLOW MODELING; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; INTERPOLATION; INVERSE ANALYSIS; KRIGING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

FRESH WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; WATER FLOW;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 77954158713     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00668.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bellin A, Tonina D. Probability density function of non-reactive solute concentration in heterogeneous porous formations. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2007, 94:109-125. no.
2. Caroni E, Fiorotto V. Analysis of concentration as sampled in natural aquifers. Transport in Porous Media 2005, 59(1):19-45. no.
3. Cirpka OA, Kitanidis PK. Sensitivity of temporal moments calculated by the adjoint-state method and joint inversing of head and tracer data. Advances in Water Resources 2000, 24(1):89-103. no.
4. Cirpka OA, Nowak W. First-order variance of travel time in nonstationary formations. Water Resources Research 2004, 3:W03507. no.
5. Dagan G. Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1984, 145:151-177.
6. Dettinger M, Wilson JM. First-order analysis of uncertainty in numerical-models of groundwater-flow. 1. Mathematical development. Water Resources Research 1981, 17(1):149-161. no.
7. Dietrich CR, Newsam GN. A fast and exact method for multidimensional Gaussian stochastic simulations. Water Resources Research 1993, 29(8):2861-2869. no.
8. Dietrich CR, Newsam GN. Fast and exact simulation of stationary Gaussian processes through circulant embedding of the covariance matrix. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1997, 18(4):1088-1107. no.
9. Drost W, Klotz D, Koch A, Moser H, Neumaier F, Rauert W. Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes. Water Resources Research 1968, 4(1):125-146. no.
10. Fiorotto V, Caroni E. Solute concentration statistics in heterogeneous aquifers for finite Peclet values. Transport in Porous Media 2002, 48(3):331-351. no., [Erratum:, 50, no. 3: 373].
11. Gelhar LW, Axness CL. Three-dimensional stochastic-analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resources Research 1983, 19(1):161-180. no.
12. Gómez-Hernández J, Sahuquillo A, Capilla J. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and storativity. 1. Theory. Journal of Hydrology 1997, 203:162-174.
13. Grisak GE, Merritt WF, Williams DW. Fluoride borehole dilution apparatus for groundwater velocity-measurements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1977, 14(4):554-561. no.
14. Gutjahr A, Bulard B, Hatch S, Hughson L. Joint conditional simulations and the spectral approach for flow modeling. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 1994, 8(1):79-108. no.
15. Harvey C, Gorelick S. Temporal moment-generating equations-modeling transport and mass-transfer in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resources Research 1995, 31(8):1895-1911. no.
16. Jones N, Davis R, Sabbah W. A comparison of three-dimensional interpolation techniques for plume characterization. Ground Water 2003, 41(4):411-419. no.
17. Kitanidis PK. Parameter uncertainty in estimation of spatial functions-Bayesian-analysis. Water Resources Research 1986, 22(4):499-507. no.
18. Kitanidis PK. Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing. Water Resources Research 1995, 31(10):2411-2419. no.
19. Kitanidis PK. Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology 1997, New York, Cambridge University Press
20. Kitanidis PK, Shen KF. Geostatistical interpolation of chemical concentration. Advances in Water Resources 1996, 19(6):369-378. no.
21. Kitanidis PK, Vomvoris EG. A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulations. Water Resources Research 1983, 19(3):677-690. no.
22. Kunstmann H, Kinzelbach W, Siegfried T. Conditional first-order second-moment method and its application to the quantification of uncertainty in groundwater modeling. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(4):1035. no.
23. Li W, Englert A, Cirpka OA, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H. Two-dimensional characterization of hydraulic heterogeneity by multiple pumping tests. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(4). no., W04433.
24. Li W, Englert A, Cirpka OA, Vereecken H. Three-dimensional geostatistical inversion of flowmeter and pumping test data. Ground Water 2008, 46(2):193-201. no.
25. Neuman SP, Winter CL, Newman CM. Stochastic-theory of field-scale Fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous-media. Water Resources Research 1987, 23(3):453-466. no.
26. Novakowski K, Bickerton G, Lapcevic P, Voralek J, Ross N. Measurements of groundwater velocity in discrete rock fractures. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2006, 82(1-2):44-60. no.
27. Nowak W. Best unbiased ensemble linearization and the quasi-linear Kalman ensemble generator. Water Resources Research 2009, 45(4):W04431. no.
28. Nowak W, Cirpka OA. A modified Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for quasi-linear geostatistical inversing. Advances in Water Resources 2004, 27(7):737-750. no.
29. Nowak W, Tenkleve S, Cirpka OA. Efficient computation of linearized cross-covariance and auto-covariance matrices of interdependent quantities. Mathematical Geology 2003, 35(1):53-66. no.
30. Palmer CD. Borehole dilution tests in the vicinity of an extraction well. Journal of Hydrology 1993, 146(1-4):245-266. no.
31. Pannone M, Kitanidis PK. Large-time spatial covariance of concentration of conservative solute and application to the Cape Cod tracer test. Transport in Porous Media 2001, 42(1-2):109-132. no.
32. Pitrak M, Mares S, Kobr M. A simple borehole dilution technique in measuring horizontal ground water flow. Ground Water 2007, 45(1):89-92. no.
33. RamaRao BS, LaVenue AM, de Marsily G, Marietta MG. Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields. 1. Theory and computational experiments. Water Resources Research 1995, 31(3):475-493. no.
34. Reed P, Ellsworth T, Minsker B. Spatial interpolation methods for nonstationary plume data. Ground Water 2004, 42(2):190-202. no.
35. Scheidegger AE. General theory of dispersion in porous media. Journal of Geophysical Research 1961, 66(10):3273-3278. no.
36. Schwede RL, Cirpka OA. Use of steady-state concentration measurements in geostatistical inversion. Advances in Water Resources 2009, 32(4):607-619. no.
37. Schwede RL, Cirpka OA, Nowak W, Neuweiler I. Impact of sampling volume on the probability density function of steady-state concentration. Water Resources Research 2008, 12:W12433. no.
38. Sun N, Yeh W. Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling. 1. Sensitivity analysis and parameter-identification. Water Resources Research 1990, 26(10):2507-2525. no.