A comparative approach to understanding general intelligence: Predicting cognitive performance in an open-ended dynamic task

Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, AGI 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 103-107

  Lebiere, Christian ^a   Gonzalez, Cleotilde ^a   Warwick, Walter ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; COMPARATIVE APPROACH; COMPUTATIONAL COGNITIVE MODELING; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; GENERAL INTELLIGENCE; GOODNESS-OF-FIT MEASURE; HUMAN PERFORMANCE;

MEMORY ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 77954132275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2991/agi.2009.2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Anderson, J. R. & Lebiere, C. L. 2003. The Newell test for a theory of cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 26, 587-637.
2. Asada, M., Kitano, H., Noda, I., and Veloso, M. 1999. RoboCup: Today and tomorrow - What we have have learned. Artificial Intelligence, 110:193-214.
3. Brehmer, B., & Allard, R. 1991. Dynamic decisionmaking: The effects of task complexity and feedback delay. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer & J. Leplat (Eds.), Distributed decision making: Cognitive models of cooperative work (pp. 319-334). Chichester: Wiley.
4. Billings, D. 2000. The First International RoShamBo Programming Competition. ICGA Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 42-50.
5. Cohen, P. 2005. If Not Turing's Test, Then What? AI Magazine 26(4): 61-67. (Pubitemid 43051192)
6. Cronin, M., & Gonzalez, C. 2007. Understanding the building blocks of dynamic systems. System Dynamics Review. 23(1), 1-17. (Pubitemid 46824969)
7. Cronin, M., Gonzalez, C., & Sterman, J. D. 2008. Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators and citizens. In press. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
8. Diehl, E., & Sterman, J. D. 1995. Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 198-215.
9. th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, (pp. ). Athens, Greece: System Dynamics Society.
10. th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, (pp. 79). Boston, MA: System Dynamics Society.
11. Erev, I., Ert, E., Roth, A. E., Haruvy, E., Herzog, S., Hau, R., Hertwig, R., Stewart, T., West, R., & Lebiere, C. (submitted). A choice prediction competition, for choices from experience and from description. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
12. Foyle, D. & Hooey, B. 2008. Human Performance Modeling in Aviation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Gluck, K, & Pew, R. 2005. Modeling Human Behavior with Integrated Cognitive Architectures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Gonzalez, C., & Dutt, V. 2007. Learning to control a dynamic task: A system dynamics cognitive model of the slope effect. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Ann Arbor, MI.
15. Hsu, F-H. 2002. Behind Deep Blue: Building the Computer that Defeated the World Chess Champion. Princeton University Press.
16. Lebiere, C., & Bothell, D. 2004. Competitive Modeling Symposium: PokerBot World Series. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Pp. 32-32.
17. Lebiere, C., Gonzalez, C., & Warwick, W. (submitted). Emergent Complexity in a Dynamic Control Task: Model Comparison.
18. Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press.
19. Roberts, S. and Pashler, H. 2000. "How Persuasive Is a Good Fit? A Comment on Theory testing." Psychological Review 107(2): pp358-367.
20. Schunn, C. D. & Wallach, D. 2001. Evaluating goodness-of-fit in comparisons of models to data. Online manuscript, http://lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/ gof/index.html
21. Selman, B., Brooks, R., Dean, T., Horvitz, E., Mitchell, T., & Nilsson, N. 1996. Challenge problems for artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 13th Natl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), Portland, OR, pp. 193-224.
22. Thrun, S. et al. 2006. Stanley, the robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge. Journal of Field Robotics, 23(9), 661-692. (Pubitemid 44566835)
23. Turing, A. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind LIX (236): 433-460.
24. Warwick, W., Allender, L., Strater, L., & Yen, J. 2008. AMBR Redux: Another Take on Model Comparison. Symposium given at the Seventeenth Conference on Behavior Representation and Simulation. Providence, Rl.