Looking for trouble: The added value of sequence analysis in finding evidence for the role of physicians in patients disclosure of cues and concerns

Medical Care

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 583-588

  Bensing, Jozien M ^a,b   Verheul, William ^a   Jansen, Jesse ^c   Langewitz, Wolf A ^d  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

communication; concerns; cues; eye contact; patient participation; sequence analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CUES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; ODDS RATIO; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 77954087943     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d567a5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, et al. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000;320:1246-1250.
2. Beisecker AE. Patient power in doctor-patient communication: what do we know? Health Commun. 1990;2:105-122.
3. Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5:281-315.
4. Ishikawa H, Takayama T, Yamazaki Y, et al. The interaction between physician and patient communication behaviors in Japanese cancer consultations and the influence of personal and consultation characteristics. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:277-285.
5. Robinson JD. An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients' participation. Health Com-mun. 2003;15:27-57.
6. Bensing JM, Tromp F, van Dulmen S, et al. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped general practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:62.
7. Barry CA, Stevenson FA, Britten N, et al. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 53:487-505.
8. Campion PD, Butler NM, Cox AD. Principle agendas of doctors and patients in general practice consultations. Fam Pract. 1992;9:181-190.
9. Zimmermann C, Del Piccolo L, Finset A. Cues and concerns by patients in medical consultations: a literature review. Psychol Bull. 2007;133: 438-463.
10. Suchman AL, Markakis K, Beckman HB, et al. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA. 1997;277:678-682.
11. Butow PN, Brown RF, Cogar S, et al. Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues. Psychooncology. 2002;11:47-58.
12. Eide H, Quera V, Graugaard P, et al. Physician-patient dialogue surrounding patients' expression of concern: applying sequence analysis to RIAS. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:145-155.
13. Uitterhoeve R, de Leeuw J, Bensing J, et al. Cue-responding behaviours of oncology nurses in video-simulated interviews. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61: 71-80.
14. Ellner A, Hoey A, Frisch LE. Speak up! BMJ. 2003;327:303-304.
15. Phillips D. Medical professional dominance and client dissatisfaction. A study of doctor-patient interaction and reported dissatisfaction with medical care among female patients at four hospitals in Trinidad and Tobago. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:1419-1425.
16. Detmar SB, Aaronson NK, Wever LD, et al. How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3295-3301.
17. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, et al. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:903-918.
18. Britten N, Stevenson FA, Barry CA, et al. Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000;320: 484-488. (Pubitemid 30173122)
19. Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors Talking With Patients/Patients Talking With Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2006.
20. Langewitz W, Nubling M, Weber H. A theory-based approach to analysing conversation sequences. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2003;12: 103-108.
21. Sowa JF. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing; 2000.
22. van den Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen SM, de Haes HC, et al. Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time? Health Expect. 2006;9:333-342.
23. Del Piccolo L, Mazzi MA, Dunn G, et al. Sequence analysis in multilevel models. A study on different sources of patient cues in medical consultations. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:2357-2370.
24. Bensing JM, Dronkers J. Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care. 1992;30:283-298.
25. Roter D, Larson S. RIAS: Roter interaction analysis system [Website]. Available at: http://www.rias.org. Accessed May 1, 2008.
26. Ong LM, Visser MR, Kruyver IP, et al. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties. Psychooncology. 1998;7:387-401.
27. Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians' behaviors and analogue patients' satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care. 1987;25:437-451.
28. Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:243-251.
29. Bensing JM, Roter DL, Hulsman RL. Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:335-342.
30. van Dulmen S, Nubling M, Langewitz W. Doctor's responses to patients' concerns; an exploration of communication sequences in gynaecology. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2003;12:98-102.
31. Inui TS, Carter WB. Problems and prospects for health services research on provider-patient communication. Med Care. 1985;23:521-538.
32. Roter DL, Larson SM, Beach MC, et al. Interactive and evaluative correlates of dialogue sequence: a simulation study applying the RIAS to turn taking structures. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71:26-33.
33. Ford S, Hall A, Ratcliffe D, et al. The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analysing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:553-566.
34. De Valck C, Bruynooghe R, Bensing JM, et al. Cue-responding in a simulated bad news situation: exploring a stress hypothesis. J Health Psychol. 2001;6:585-596.
35. Rogers CD. Client-centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. London: Constable; 1951.
36. Bensing JM, Kerssens JJ, Pasch M. Patient-directed gaze as a tool for discovering and handling psychosocial problems in general practice. J Nonverbal Behav. 1995;19:223.
37. Maynard DW, Heritage J. Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication. Med Educ. 2005;39:428-435.
38. Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expect. 2001;4:58-70.