Application of the cropping system model (csm)-cropgro-soybean for determining optimum management strategies for soybean in tropical environments

Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 231-242

  Banterng, P ^a,b   Hoogenboom, G ^a   Patanothai, A ^b   Singh, P ^c   Wani, S P ^c   Pathak, P ^c   Tongpoonpol, S ^d   Atichart, S ^d   Srihaban, P ^e   Buranaviriyakul, S ^f   Jintrawet, A ^f   Nguyen, T C ^g  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

^b KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

^d Offices of Agricultural Research and PO   (Thailand)

^e Development Department (DLD) Regional Office 5   (Thailand)

^f CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^g Vietnam Agricultural Science Institute   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Crop simulation model; CSM CROPGRO Soybean; Decision Support System; Soil; Weather

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL MODELING; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; DATA SET; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; GROWTH RATE; HISTORICAL RECORD; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MODEL TEST; OPTIMIZATION; SOIL PROPERTY; SOYBEAN; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

KHON KAEN [NORTHEASTERN REGION]; NORTHEASTERN REGION; PHU PHA MAN; THAILAND;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 77954047797     PISSN: 09312250     EISSN: 1439037X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00408.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aggarwal P K, Kalra N. Analyzing the limitation set by climatic factors, genotype, and water and nitrogen availability on productivity of wheat: II. Climatically potential yields and management strategies. Field Crops Res. 1994, 36:161-166.
2. Anothai J, Patanothai A, Jogloy S, Pannangpetch K, Boote K J, Hoogenboom G. A sequential approach for determining the cultivar coefficients of peanut lines using end-of-season data of crop performance trials. Field Crops Res. 2008, 108:169-178.
3. Banterng P, Patanothai A, Pannangpetch K, Jogloy S, Hoogenboom G. Seasonal variation in the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut lines. J. Agric. Sci. 2003, 141:51-62.
4. Banterng P, Patanothai A, Pannangpetch K, Jogloy S, Hoogenboom G. Yield stability evaluation of peanut lines: a comparison of an experimental versus a simulation approach. Field Crops Res. 2006, 96:168-175.
5. Boote K J, Tollenaar M. Modeling genetic yield potential. Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield 1994, 533-565. Boote K J, Bennett J MSinclair T RPaulsen G M. In, eds, pp, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI
6. Boote K J, Jones J W, Hoogenboom G, Pickering N B. Simulation of crop growth: CROPGRO model. Understanding Options for Agricultural Production 1998, 99-128. Tsuji G Y, Hoogenboom G, Thornton P K, In, eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
7. Chapman C S, Hammer G L, Butler D G, Cooper M. Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III: temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2000, 51:223-233.
8. Egli D B, Bruening W. Planting date and soybean yield: evaluation of environmental effect with a crop simulation model: SOYGRO. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1992, 62:19-29.
9. Geng S, Hess C E, Auburn J. Sustainable agricultural systems: concepts and definitions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1990, 165:73-85.
10. Hoogenboom G, Jones J W, Boote K T. Modeling growth, development, and yield of grain legumes using SOYGRO, PNUTGRO, and BEANGRO: a review. Trans. ASAE 1992, 35:2043-2056.
11. DSSAT Version 3, Volume 4 1999, Hoogenboom GWilkens P WTsuji G Y. eds, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
12. Hoogenboom G, Jones J W, Wilkens P W, Porter C H, Batchelor W D, Hunt L A, Boote K J, Singh U, Uryasev O, Bowen W T, Gijsman A J, Du Toit A S, White J W, Tsuji G Y. Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Version 4.0. [CD-ROM] 2004, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
13. Hunt L A, Pararajasingham S, Wiersma J V. Effects of planting date on the development and yield of spring wheat: simulation of field data. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1996, 76:51-58.
14. Technical Report 1. Experimental Design and Data Collection Procedure for IBSNAT. The Minimum Data Sets for Systems Analysis and Crop Simulation 1988, 3rd edn, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
15. Jefing Y, Herridge D F, Peoples M B, Rerkasem B. Effects of N fertilization on N2 fixation and N balances of soybean grown after lowland rice. Plant Soil 1992, 147:235-242.
16. Jones J W, Hoogenboom G, Porter C H, Boote K J, Batchelor W D, Hunt L A, Wilkens P W, Singh U, Gijsman A J, Ritchie J T. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18:235-265.
17. Kucey R M N, Chaiwanakupt P, Boonkerd N, Sanitwongse P, Siripaibool C, Wadisirisuk P, Arayangkool T. Nitrogen fixation (N-15 dilution) with soybeans under Thai field conditions. IV. Effect of N addition and Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation in soils with indigenous B. japonicum populations. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1989, 67:137-144.
18. Meinke H, Hammer G L. A peanut simulation model: II. Assessing regional production potential. Agron. J. 1995, 87:1093-1099.
19. Meinke H, Hammer G L, Chapman S C. A sunflower simulation model: II. Simulating production risks in a variable subtropical environment. Agron. J. 1993, 85:735-742.
20. Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development 1993, Penning de Vries F W TTeng PMetselaar K. eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
21. Phakamas N, Patanothai A, Pannangpetch K, Jogloy S, Hoogenboom G. Dynamic patterns of components of genotype x environment interaction for pod yield of peanut over multiple years: a simulation approach. Field Crops Res. 2008a, 106:9-21.
22. Phakamas N, Patanothai A, Pannangpetch K, Jogloy S, Hoogenboom G. Seasonal responses and genotype-by-season interactions for the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut. J. Agric. Sci. 2008b, 146:311-323.
23. Ritchie J T. Soil water balance and plant water stress. Understanding Options for Agricultural Production 1998, 41-54. Tsuji G YHoogenboom GThornton P K. In, eds, pp, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
24. Soler C M T, Hoogenboom G, Sentelhas P C, Duarte A P. Growth analysis of maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment under rainfed and irrigated conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2007a, 193:247-261.
25. Soler C M T, Sentelhas P C, Hoogenboom G. Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment. Eur. J. Agron. 2007b, 27:165-177.
26. Tewari K, Suganuma T, Fujikake H, Ohtake N, Sueyoshi K, Takahashi Y, Ohyama T. Effect of deep placement of N fertilizers and different inoculation methods of Bradyrhizobia on growth, N2 fixation activity and N adsorption rate of field-grown soybean plants. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2004, 190:46-58.
27. DSSAT Version 3 1994, Tsuji G YUehara GBalas S. eds, Vols. 1-3, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
28. Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development 1998, Tsuji G YHoogenboom GThornton P K. eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
29. Van Jaarsveld C M, Smit M A, Krüger G H J. Interaction amongst soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] genotype, soil type and inoculants strain with regard to N2 fixation. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2002, 188:206-211.
30. Wallach D, Goffinet B. Mean squared error of prediction in models for studying ecological and agronomic systems. Biometrics 1987, 43:561-573.
31. White J W, Hoogenboom G, Jones J W, Boote K J. Evaluation of dry bean model Beangro V1.01 for crop production research in a tropical environment. Exp. Agric. 1995, 31:241-254.
32. Willmott C J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1982, 63:1309-1313.
33. Yinbo G, Peoples M B, Rerkasem B. The effect of N fertilizer strategy on N2 fixation, growth and yield of vegetable soybean. Field Crops Res. 1997, 51:221-229.