Seasonal responses and genotype-by-season interactions for the growth dynamic and development traits of peanut

Journal of Agricultural Science

Volumn 146, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 311-323

  Phakamas, N ^a   Patanothai, A ^a   Pannangpetch, K ^a   Jogloy, S ^a   Hoogenboom, G ^b  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DISEASE; BIOMASS; CROP YIELD; FIELDWORK; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RATE; LEAF AREA INDEX; NUT; PHENOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASONALITY; YIELD RESPONSE;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 43749085527     PISSN: 00218596     EISSN: 14695146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021859608007739     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ABELEDO, L. G., CALDERINI, D. F. & SLAFER, G. A. (2003). Genetic improvement of barley yield potential and its physiological determinants in Argentina (1944-1998). Euphytica 130, 325-334.
2. BANTERNG, P., PATANOTHAI, A., PANNANGPETCH, K., JOGLOY, S. & HOOGENBOOM, G. (2003). Seasonal variation in the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut lines. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 141, 51-62.
3. BASFORD, K. E. & COOPER, M. (1998). Genotype x environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 153-174.
4. BASFORD, K. E., WILLIAMS, E. R., CULLIS, B. R. & GILMOUR, A. (1996). Experimental design and analysis of variety trials. In Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement (Eds M. Cooper & G. L. Hammer), pp. 125-138. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
5. BELL, M. J., SHORTER, R. & MAYER, R. (1991). Cultivar and environmental effects on growth and development of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). I. Emergence and flowering. Field Crops Research 27, 17-33.
6. BELL, M. J., WRIGHT, G. C. & HARCH, G. R. (1993). Environmental and agronomic effects on the growth of four peanut cultivars in a subtropical environment. I. Dry matter accumulation and radiation use efficiency. Experimental Agriculture 29, 473-490.
7. BOOTE, K. J. (1982). Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science 9, 35-40.
8. BOOTE, K. J., KROPFF, M. J. & BINDRABAN, P. S. (2001). Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement. Agricultural Systems 70, 395-420.
9. CAMPBELL, I. S. (1980). Growth and development of florunner peanuts as affected by temperature. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
10. COOPER, M. & DELACY, I. H. (1994). Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88, 561-572.
11. COX, F. R. (1979). Effect of temperature treatment on peanut vegetative and fruit growth. Peanut Science 6, 14-17.
12. DUNCAN, W. G., MCCLOUD, D. E., MCGRAW, R. L. & BOOTE, K. J. (1978). Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Science 18, 1015-1020.
13. GOMEZ, K. A. & GOMEZ, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. JACKSON, P., ROBERTSON, M., COOPER, M. & HAMMER, G. (1996). The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding: from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Research 49, 11-37.
15. KANG, M. S. (1990). Understanding and utilization of genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding. In Genotype-by- environment Interaction and Plant Breeding (Ed. M. S. Kang), pp. 52-68. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
16. KANG, M. S. (1998). Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Advances in Agronomy 62, 199-252.
17. KANG, M. S. (2002). Genotype-environment interaction: progress and prospects. In Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding (Ed. M. S. Kang), pp. 221-243. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
18. KETRING, D. L. & WHELESS, T.G. (1989). Thermal time requirements for phenological development of peanut. Agronomy Journal 81, 910-917.
19. KRISHNAMURTHY, L., JOHANSON, C. & SETHI, S. C. (1999). Investigation of factors determining genotypic differences in seed yield of non-irrigated and irrigated chickpea using a physiological model of yield determination. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 183, 9-17.
20. MCDONALD, D., SUBRAMANYAM, P., GIBBONS, R. W. & SMITH, D. H. (1985). Early and Late Leafspots of Groundnut. ICRISAT Information Bulletin No. 21. Patancheru, A.P., India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
21. NTARE, B. R., WILLIAMS, J. H. & NDUNGURU, B. J. (1998). Effect of seasonal variation in temperature and cultivar on yield and yield determination of irrigated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) during the dry season in the Sahel of West Africa. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131, 439-448.
22. NUTTER, F. W. & LITTRELL, R. H. (1996). Relationships between defoliation, canopy reflectance and pod yield in the peanut-late leafspot pathosystem. Crop Protection 15, 135-142.
23. SUBRAHMANYAM, P., MOSS, J. P., MCD ONALD, D., RAO, P. V. S. & RAO, P. R. (1985). Resistance to leaf spot caused by Cercosporidium personatum in wild Arachis species. Plant Disease 69, 951-954.
24. VARA PRASAD, P. V., CRAUFURD, P. Q. & SUMMERFIELD, R. J. (2000). Effect of high air and soil temperature on dry matter production, pod yield and yield components of groundnut. Plant and Soil 222, 231-239.
25. WALLACE, D. H., BAUDOIN, J. P., BEAVER, J. S., COYNE, D. P., HALSETH, D. E., MASAYA, P. N., MUNGER, H. M., MYERS, J. R., SILBERNAGEL, M., YOURSTONE, K. S. & ZOBEL, R. W. (1993). Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 27-40.
26. WILLIAMS, J. H. & SAXENA, N. P. (1991). The use of non-destructive measurement and physiological models of yield determination to investigate factors determining differences in seed yield between genotypes of desi chickpeas (Cicer arietum). Annals of Applied Biology 119, 105-112.
27. WRIGHT, G. C., NAGESWARA RAO, R. C. & BASU, M. S. (1996). A physiological approach to the understanding of genotypes by environment interactions - a case study on improvement of drought adaptation in peanut. In Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement (Eds M. Cooper & G. L. Hammer), pp. 365-381. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.