Evaluating the multivariate visual quality performance of image-processing components

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Radun, Jenni ^a   Leisti, Tuomas ^a   Virtanen, Toni ^a   Häkkinen, Jukka ^a   Vuori, Tero ^b   Nyman, Göte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERA IMAGES; END-USERS; HIGH QUALITY IMAGES; HIGH-QUALITY IMAGING; IMAGING DEVICE; LOW QUALITIES; NATURAL IMAGES; QUALITY PERFORMANCE; VISUAL QUALITIES;

ESTIMATION; PIPELINE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PIPELINES; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 77954002833     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1773965.1773967     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ECKERT, M. P. AND BRADLEY, A. P. 1998. Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression. Signal Process. 70, 177-200.
2. ENGELDRUM, P. G. 2004. A short image quality model taxonomy. J. Imag. Sci. Technol. 48, 160-165.
3. ENGELDRUM, P. G. 2000. Psychometric Scaling: A Toolkit for Imaging Systems Development. Imcotek Press, Winchester, MA.
4. FAYE, P., BRÉMAUD, D., DAUBIN, M. D., COURCOUX, P., GIBOREAU, A., AND NICOD, H. 2004. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naïve subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Qual. Preference 15, 781-791.
5. GREENACRE, M. 2007. Correspondence Analysis in Practice 2nd Ed. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
6. HAIR, J., ANDERSON, R., TATHAM, R., AND BLACK, W. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. HALONEN, R., LEISTI, T., AND OITTINEN, P. 2008. The influence of image content and paper grade on quality attributes computed from printed natural images. In Proceedings of the IS&T's International Conference on Digital Printing Technologies (NIP24). Society for Imaging Sciences and Technology, Springfield, VA.
8. HäKKINEN, J., KAWAI, T., TAKATALO, J., LEISTI, T., RADUN, J., HIRSAHO, A., AND NYMAN, G. 2008. Measuring stereoscopic image quality experience with interpretation based quality methodology. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology. SPIE, Philadelphia.
9. JANSSEN, T. J. W. M. AND BLOMMAERT, F. J. J. 2000. A computational approach to image quality. Displays 21, 129.142.
10. KEELAN, B. W. 2002. Handbook of Image Quality: Characterization and Prediction. Marcel Decker Inc., New York.
11. MARTENS, J-B. 2002. Multidimensional modeling of image quality. Proc. IEEE 90, 1, 133-153.
12. NYMAN, G., RADUN, J., LEISTI, T., AND VUORI, T. 2005. From image fidelity to subjective quality: a hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology for measuring subjective image quality for different image contents. In cProceedings of the 12th International Display Workshops (IDW'05). 1825-1828.
13. PICARD, D., DACREMONT, C., VALENTIN, D., AND GIBOREAU, A. 2003. Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychologica 114, 165.184.
14. RADUN, J., LEISTI, T. HäKKINEN, J., OJANEN, H., OLIVES, J-L, VUORI, T., AND NYMAN, G. 2008. Content and quality: Interpretationbased estimation of image quality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percpt. 4, 4.
15. RADUN, J., VIRTANEN, T., OLIVES, J. L., VAAHTERANOKSA, M., VUORI, T., AND NYMAN, G. 2007. Audiovisual quality estimation of mobile phone video cameras with interpretation-based quality approach. In Proceedings of the Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology. SPIE, Philadelphia.
16. RADUN, J., VIRTANEN, T., NYMAN, G., AND OLIVES, J-L. Explaining multivariate image quality: interpretation-based quality approach. In Proceedings of the 30th International Congress of Imaging Science Conference (ICIS'06). International Congress of Imaging Science, 119-121.
17. DE RIDDER, H. 1996. Naturalness and image quality: saturation and lightness variation in color images of natural scenes. J. Imag. Sci. Technol. 40, 487.493.
18. SHIBATA, T., KURIHARA, S., KAWAI, T., TAKAHASHI, T., SHIMIZU, T., KAWADA, R., ITO, A., HäKKINEN, J., TAKATALO, J., AND NYMAN, G. 2009. Evaluation of stereoscopic image quality for mobile devices using interpretation based quality methodology. In Proceedings of Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology. SPIE, Philadelphia.
19. TO, M., LOVELL, P. G., TROSCIANCO, T., AND TOLHURST, D. J. 2008. Summation of perceptual cues in natural visual scenes. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 275, 2299.2308.
20. YENDRIKHOVSKIJ, S. N., BLOMMAERT, F. J. J., AND DE RIDDER, H. 1999a. Color reproduction and the naturalness constraint. Color Res. Appl. 24, 1, 52-67.
21. YENDRIKHOVSKIJ, S., MACDONALD, L., BECH, S., AND JENSEN, K. 1999b. Enhancing colour image quality in television displays. Imag. Sci. J. 47, 197.211.
22. VIRTANEN, T., RADUN, J., LINDROOS, P., SUOMI, S., SääMä NEN, T., VUORI, T., VAAHTERANOKSA, M., AND NYMAN, G. 2008. Forming valid scales for subjective video quality measurement based on a hybrid qualitative/ quantitative methodology. In Proceedings of Electronic: Imaging Science and Technology. SPIE, Philadelphia.