Forming valid scales for subjective video quality measurement based on a hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6808, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Virtanen, T ^a   Radun, J ^a   Lindroos, P ^a   Suomi, S ^a   Saamanen, T ^a   Vuori, T ^b   Vaahteranoksa, M ^b   Nyman, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio visual quality; Qualitative approach; Subjective quality estimation; Video camera comparison

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL CAMERAS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); EXTRACTION; FACE RECOGNITION; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SENSORS; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; VIDEO AMPLIFIERS; VIDEO CAMERAS;

ASSESSMENT SCALE; AUDIO-VISUAL QUALITY; DIGITAL STILL CAMERAS; DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERAS; END USERS; MEAN OPINION SCORES; MOBILE PHONE CAMERAS; QUALITATIVE APPROACH; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; QUALITY MEASURES; QUALITY VARIATIONS; SINGLE VALUES; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY ESTIMATION; SUBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITIES; UNDERLYING CAUSE; VIDEO CAPTURING; VIDEO MATERIALS; VIDEO QUALITIES; VIEWING CONDITIONS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 57649087123     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.765831     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. ITU-T recommendation in P.910 (09/99), http://www.itu.int
2. Gescheider G., Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1985)
3. Engeldrum P., Psychometric scaling: A toolkit for imaging system development, Imcotek Press, Winchester, Massachusetts, USA, 2000.
4. Meilaard M., Civille G. V. and T. Carr T., Sensory evaluation techniques, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, (1999)
5. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Daubin, M. D., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A. and Nicod, H. "Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with nai've subjects: an alternative to descriptive mappings." Food Quality and Preference 15, 781-791. (2004)
6. Picard D., Dacremont C., Valentin D. and Giboreau A. "Perceptual dimensions of tactile tectures." Acta Psychologica 114, 165-184 (2003).
7. th Audio Engineering Society convention, Preprint 6113, Berlin, May 2004
8. ITU-Rrecomendationin BT.500-11 (Question ITU-R 211/11), http://www.itu.int.
9. Video Quality Expert Group, Multimedia group Test Plan, Draft version 1.11, February 2006
10. Nyman, G., Radun, J., Leisti T. and Vuori T. (2005) "From image fidelity to subjective quality: a hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology for measuring subjetive image quality for diferent image contents." In: Proc. 12th International Display Workshops (IDW '05), 1825-1828, Takamatsu, Japan, Dec. 2005,
11. Nyman G., Radun J., Leisti T., Oja J., Ojanen H., Olives J-L., Vuori T. and Hakkinen J. "What do users really perceive: Probing the subjective image quality," In proc. of Electronic Imaging Science and Technology 6059, San Jose, USA. Jan 2006
12. Radun J., Virtanen T., Nyman G. and Olives J-L. "Explaining multivariate image quality - Interpretation-Based Quality Approach," In Proc. of ICIS '06, Rochester, NY, USA, 119-121 (2006).
13. Radun, J., Virtanen, T., Olives, J-L, Vaahteranoksa, M., Vuori, T. and Nyman, G. (2007). "Audiovisual Qaulity Estimation of Mobile Phone Video Cameras with Interpretation-Based Quality Approach." In: Proc. of Electronic Imaging Science and Technology 6494, San Jose, USA. Jan. 2007
14. Linna V., Täällä pohjantdhden alia 1, WSOY, Porvoo, Finland, 1962.
15. Avisynt, http://www.avisynth.org/
16. Apple Quictime Pro, http://www.apple.com/quicktime/wm.html
17. VirtualDub, http://www.virtualdub.org/
18. Tuomi O. and Zacharov N. "A real-time binaural loudness meter", Presented at the 139th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Atlanta, USA, June, (2000).
19. Strauss A., & Corbin J, Basics of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Inc., California, USA, 1998.
20. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R. and Black W, Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1998