Fractal topology of hand-crumpled paper

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Balankin, Alexander S ^a   Ochoa, Didier Samayoa ^a   Miguel, Israel Andrés ^a   Ortiz, Julián Patiño ^a   Cruz, Miguel Ángel Martínez ^a  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-PLANE; BALL DIAMETER; CRUMPLED PAPER; FLAT SHEETS; FRACTAL PROPERTIES; MOSAIC PATTERNS; SCALE INVARIANCE; SHEET SIZE;

INITIATORS (CHEMICAL); PARTIAL DISCHARGES; SPHERES; TOPOLOGY;

FRACTAL DIMENSION;

EID: 77953986990     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.061126     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. B. Honig, J. Mol. Biol. 293, 283 (1999) 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3006
2. A. V. Finkelstein and O. V. Galzitskaya, Phys. Life. Rev. 1, 23 (2004) 10.1016/j.plrev.2004.03.001
3. E. Tejera, A. Machado, I. Rebelo, and J. Nieto-Villar, Physica A 388, 4600 (2009). 10.1016/j.physa.2009.07.015
4. T. Hwa, E. Kokufuta, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. A 44, R2235 (1991) 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.R2235
5. M. S. Spector, E. Naranjo, S. Chiruvolu, and J. A. Zasadzinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2867 (1994) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2867
6. Y. Lin, H. Skaff, A. Böker, D. A. Dinsmore, T. Emrick, and T. P. Russell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 12690 (2003) 10.1021/ja036919a
7. Q. Kuang, S.-Y. Xie, Zh.-Y. Jiang, S. H. Zhang, Zh.-X. Xie, R. B. Huang, and L. S. Zheng, Carbon 42, 1737 (2004). 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.008
8. D. L. Blair and A. Kudrolli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 166107 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.166107
9. E. Sultan and A. Boudaoud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136103 (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.136103
10. J. Guven and M. M. Müller, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 055203 (2008). 10.1088/1751-8113/41/5/055203
11. A. S. Balankin, R. C. Montes de Oca, and D. Samayoa, Phys. Rev. E 76, 032101 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.032101
12. D. M. Hansen and J. Cartwright, J. Struct. Geol. 28, 1520 (2006) 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.04.004
13. Z. Ismat, J. Struct. Geol. 31, 972 (2009). 10.1016/j.jsg.2008.10.006
14. M. Kaku, Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10 t h Dimension (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
15. P. Di Francesco, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 37, 251 (2000) 10.1090/S0273-0979- 00-00870-3
16. E. D. Demaine, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2098, 113 (2001) 10.1007/3-540-47738-1-9
17. T. Biedl, A. Lubiw, and J. Sun, Comput. Geom. 31, 207 (2005). 10.1016/j.comgeo.2004.12.004
18. R. Lipowsky, Nature (London) 349, 475 (1991) 10.1038/349475a0
19. G. Gompper, Nature (London) 386, 439 (1997) 10.1038/386439a0
20. E. Cerda, S. Chaieb, F. Melo, and L. Mahadevan, Nature (London) 401, 46 (1999) 10.1038/43395
21. A. Boudaoud, P. Patrício, Y. Couder, and M. Ben Amar, Nature (London) 407, 718 (2000) 10.1038/35037535
22. R. Lakes, Nature (London) 414, 503 (2001) 10.1038/35107190
23. M. J. Bowick and A. Travesset, Phys. Rep. 344, 255 (2001) 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00128-9
24. B. Didonna, Nature Mater. 5, 167 (2006) 10.1038/nmat1599
25. M. Marder, R. D. Deegan, and E. Sharon, Phys. Today 60 (2), 33 (2007) 10.1063/1.2711634
26. Y. Klein, E. Efrati, and E. Sharon, Science 315, 1116 (2007). 10.1126/science.1135994
27. M. A. F. Gomes, T. I. Lih, and T. I. Ren, J. Phys. A 23, L1281 (1990) 10.1088/0305-4470/23/24/001
28. J. B. C. García, M. A. F. Gomes, T. I. Jyh, and T. I. Ren, J. Phys. A 25, L353 (1992) 10.1088/0305-4470/25/7/012
29. M. A. F. Gomes, T. I. Lih, and T. I. Ren, J. Phys. D 40, 3665 (2007) 10.1088/0022-3727/40/12/017
30. C. C. Donato and M. A. F. Gomes, Phys. Rev. E 75, 066113 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.066113
31. A. E. Lobkovsky, Sh. Gentges, H. Li, D. Morse, and T. A. Witten, Science 270, 1482 (1995) 10.1126/science.270.5241.1482
32. A. E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. E 53, 3750 (1996) 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.3750
33. E. M. Kramer and A. E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. E 53, 1465 (1996) 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.1465
34. P. A. Houle and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. E 54, 278 (1996) 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.278
35. E. M. Kramer and T. A. Witten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1303 (1997) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1303
36. E. Cerda and L. Mahadevan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2358 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2358
37. B. A. DiDonna and T. A. Witten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206105 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.206105
38. K. Matan, R. B. Williams, T. A. Witten, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076101 (2002) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.076101
39. A. Gopinathan, T. A. Witten, and S. C. Venkataramani, Phys. Rev. E 65, 036613 (2002) 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.036613
40. B. A. DiDonna, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016601 (2002) 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016601
41. J. A. Aström, J. Timonen, and M. Karttunen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 244301 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.244301
42. T. Liang and T. A. Witten, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016612 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016612
43. A. S. Balankin,, Phys. Rev. E 73, 065105 (R) (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevE.73. 065105
44. N. Stoop, F. K. Wittel, and H. J. Herrmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 094101 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.094101
45. T. Tallinen, J. A. Aström, and J. Timonen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 106101 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.106101
46. A. S. Balankin and O. Susarrey Huerta, Phys. Rev. E 77, 051124 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051124
47. O. Susarrey Huerta, M. Mendoza Nuñez, P. A. Tamayo Meza, and A. S. Balankin, Adv. Mater. Res. 65, 33 (2009) 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.65.33
48. S. Deboeuf, M. Adda-Bedia, and A. Boudaoud, EPL 85, 24002 (2009) 10.1209/0295-5075/85/24002
49. T. A. Witten, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3738 (2009). 10.1021/jp807548s
50. T. A. Witten, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 643 (2007). 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.643
51. M. A. F. Gomes, Am. J. Phys. 55, 649 (1987) 10.1119/1.15094
52. M. A. F. Gomes, J. Phys. A 20, L283 (1987) 10.1088/0305-4470/20/5/005
53. R. Cassia-Moura and M. A. F. Gomes, J. Theor. Biol. 238, 331 (2006). 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.015
54. G. A. Vliegenthart and G. Gompper, Nature Mater. 5, 216 (2006). 10.1038/nmat1581
55. T. Tallinen, J. A. Aström, and J. Timonen, Nature Mater. 8, 25 (2009). 10.1038/nmat2343
56. A. S. Balankin, D. Morales, E. Pineda León, A. Horta Rangel, M. A. Martínez Cruz, and D. Samayoa, Physica A 388, 1780 (2009). 10.1016/j.physa.2009.01.021
57. It should be pointed out that that D = 2.3 was calculated in using the scaling relationship between D and the scaling exponents governing the force-compression relation, while in the fractal dimension D = 2.5 was obtained from direct numerical simulations.
58. A. S. Balankin, O. Susarrey, R. C. Montes de Oca, D. Samayoa, J. Martinez Trinidad, and M. Mendoza, Phys. Rev. E 74, 061602 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74. 061602
59. R. F. Albuquerque and M. A. F. Gomes, Physica A 310, 377 (2002) 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00747-1
60. A. S. Balankin, I. Campos Silva, O. A. Martinez, and O. Susarrey, Phys. Rev. E 75, 051117 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.051117
61. Y. C. Lin, Y. L. Wang, Y. Liu, and T. M. Hong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 125504 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.125504
62. Y. C. Lin, J. M. Sun, H. W. Yang, C. L. Wang, Y. Hwu, and T. M. Hong, Phys. Rev. E 80, 066114 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.066114
63. Y. C. Lin, J. M. Sun, J. H. Hsiao, Y. Hwu, C. L. Wang, and T. M. Hong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 263902 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.263902
64. S. C. Venkataramani, T. A. Witten, E. M. Kramer, and R. P. Geroch, J. Math. Phys. 41, 5107 (2000). 10.1063/1.533394
65. Ch. A. Andresen and A. Hansen, Phys. Rev. E 76, 026108 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026108
66. A. S. Balankin and O. Susarrey, in Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Scaling in Solid Mechanics, edited by, F. Borodich, (Springer, Cardiff, 2009).
67. Y. Kantor, M. Kardar, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3056 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevA.35.3056
68. The strain relaxation after the folding force is withdrawn is essential for the universality of local fractal dimension D l, since under increasing folding force D l will increase up to D l = 3, when the folded ball becomes compact without porosity. Notice that the porosity of all paper balls used in this work was larger than 80%.
69. BENOIT 1.3, http://www.trusoft-international.com
70. W. Seffens, Science 285, 1228 (1999). 10.1126/science.285.5431.1228a
71. The goodness-of-fit tests with the Chi-squared, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Anderson statistics were performed with the help of @RISK software (http://www.palisade.com).